OnePlus Nord CE5 vs Oppo Reno6 5G: A Detailed Comparison of Mid-Range Powerhouses
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the OnePlus Nord CE5 emerges as the stronger contender. Its significantly more powerful Mediatek Dimensity 8350 chipset, coupled with 80W charging and a brighter display, offers a superior overall experience. While the Reno6 5G remains a capable device, it's outpaced in core performance and charging speed.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | OnePlus Nord CE5 | Oppo Reno6 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 3, 5, 8, 20, 28, 7, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, July 08 | 2021, May 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, July 08 | Available. Released 2021, June 11 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.6 x 76 x 8.2 mm (6.44 x 2.99 x 0.32 in) | 156.8 x 72.1 x 7.6 mm (6.17 x 2.84 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 182 g (6.42 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2392 pixels (~387 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.77 inches, 111.5 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~88.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Fluid AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 800 nits (typ), 1300 nits (HBM), 1430 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM), 750 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Apex (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali G615-MC6 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, ColorOS 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | - |
| Features | LED flash, Ultra HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps (HDR), 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | Panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 23mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired Bypass charging | 65W wired |
| Type | Market-dependent versions:· 5200 mAh (Global)· Si/C Li-Ion 7100 mAh (India) | Li-Po 4300 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Marble Mist, Black Infinity, Nexus Blue | Stellar Black, Aurora, Blue, Purple |
| Models | CPH2719 | PEQM00, CPH2251 |
| Price | € 279.99 / £ 229.00 / ₹ 24,998 | € 146.99 / ₹ 25,999 |
| SAR | 1.20 W/kg (head) 0.91 W/kg (body) | 1.14 W/kg (head) 0.08 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.96 W/kg (head) 1.18 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 109h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -30.0 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 362450 (v8), 430765 (v9) GeekBench: 2131 (v5.1) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 61:48h endurance, 1200 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class A (300 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
OnePlus Nord CE5
- Significantly faster processor (Dimensity 8350)
- Much brighter display for outdoor visibility
- 80W SuperVOOC charging for rapid refills
- Longer battery endurance (61:48h)
- Camera specifications are currently unknown
- Brand recognition may be lower than Oppo
Oppo Reno6 5G
- Established brand reputation (Oppo)
- Potentially refined camera image processing
- 65W fast charging is still respectable
- Slightly more compact design (assumed based on market positioning)
- Older and less powerful chipset (Dimensity 900)
- Dimmer display limits outdoor usability
- Shorter battery endurance (109h)
- Less efficient 6nm process
Display Comparison
The OnePlus Nord CE5 boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1231 nits, compared to the Oppo Reno6 5G’s 632 nits. This translates to vastly improved visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While the Reno6 5G claims an 'Infinite' contrast ratio, this is a nominal value and doesn't necessarily equate to a superior viewing experience. The Nord CE5’s higher peak brightness is a tangible benefit for everyday use, especially for content consumption. Both displays lack information regarding refresh rate or panel technology (LTPO, AMOLED), but the brightness difference is a clear win for the Nord CE5.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details regarding sensor size, aperture, or optical image stabilization (OIS). Given Oppo’s historical strength in camera technology, the Reno6 5G likely offers a more refined image processing pipeline. However, without concrete sensor specifications, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on the Reno6 5G is unlikely to significantly impact image quality, and should be considered a marketing feature rather than a substantial benefit. The Nord CE5’s camera performance remains largely unknown without further details.
Performance
The performance gap between these two devices is substantial. The OnePlus Nord CE5’s Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Apex (4nm) is a generation ahead of the Oppo Reno6 5G’s Dimensity 900 (6nm). The 8350 features newer Cortex-A715 cores, offering a significant uplift in both single-core and multi-core performance. The CPU configuration – 1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715, 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715, and 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510 – is more efficient and powerful than the Reno6 5G’s 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55. The 4nm process node of the Dimensity 8350 also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of performance throttling during extended gaming sessions. The Reno6 5G, while capable for everyday tasks, will struggle with graphically intensive games and multitasking compared to the Nord CE5.
Battery Life
The OnePlus Nord CE5 offers a compelling battery and charging combination. While the battery capacity isn't specified, its 61:48h endurance rating significantly surpasses the Oppo Reno6 5G’s 109h rating. This suggests a more efficient chipset and power management. Furthermore, the Nord CE5’s 80W wired charging is considerably faster than the Reno6 5G’s 65W charging, allowing for quicker top-ups. The Nord CE5 also features bypass charging, which minimizes battery degradation during prolonged charging, a feature absent in the Reno6 5G. The Nord CE5’s active use score of 14:42h further reinforces its superior battery performance.
Buying Guide
Buy the OnePlus Nord CE5 if you prioritize raw performance for gaming and demanding applications, and value incredibly fast charging. You'll benefit from a smoother user experience and longer software support. Buy the Oppo Reno6 5G if you prefer a more established brand with a focus on camera features and a slightly more refined software experience, and aren't as concerned with having the absolute latest chipset.