OnePlus Nord CE5 vs Motorola Edge 20 Fusion: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the OnePlus Nord CE5 emerges as the superior choice. Its Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Apex chipset provides a substantial performance uplift over the Edge 20 Fusion’s Dimensity 800U, and the 80W charging is a game-changer for convenience. While the Edge 20 Fusion remains a capable device, the Nord CE5 offers a more future-proof and responsive experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | OnePlus Nord CE5 | Motorola Edge 20 Fusion |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 66 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, July 08 | 2021, August 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, July 08 | Available. Released 2021, August 27 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front |
| Dimensions | 163.6 x 76 x 8.2 mm (6.44 x 2.99 x 0.32 in) | 166 x 76 x 8.3 mm (6.54 x 2.99 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 185 g (6.53 oz) |
| - | Water-repellent design | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2392 pixels (~387 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.77 inches, 111.5 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Fluid AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 800 nits (typ), 1300 nits (HBM), 1430 nits (peak) | OLED, 1B colors, 90Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Apex (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 800U (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali G615-MC6 | Mali-G57 MC3 |
| OS | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 11 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | - |
| Features | LED flash, Ultra HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps (HDR), 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 23mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.3, (wide), 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired Bypass charging | 30W wired |
| Type | Market-dependent versions:· 5200 mAh (Global)· Si/C Li-Ion 7100 mAh (India) | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Marble Mist, Black Infinity, Nexus Blue | Electric Graphite, Cyber Teal |
| Models | CPH2719 | - |
| Price | € 279.99 / £ 229.00 / ₹ 24,998 | About 250 EUR |
| SAR | 1.20 W/kg (head) 0.91 W/kg (body) | - |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 61:48h endurance, 1200 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class A (300 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
OnePlus Nord CE5
- Significantly faster processor for smoother performance
- 80W SuperVOOC charging for rapid top-ups
- Higher peak display brightness for better outdoor visibility
- May be slightly more expensive than the Edge 20 Fusion
- OxygenOS, while improved, isn't universally loved
Motorola Edge 20 Fusion
- Potentially more affordable price point
- Clean and near-stock Android experience
- Sleek and lightweight design
- Older and less powerful Dimensity 800U chipset
- Slower 30W charging
- Likely inferior gaming performance
Display Comparison
The OnePlus Nord CE5 boasts a display capable of reaching a measured 1231 nits of peak brightness, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the Edge 20 Fusion’s display specifications aren’t provided, Motorola typically focuses on color accuracy in this segment. The Nord CE5’s higher brightness is a clear advantage for outdoor use and HDR content consumption. The absence of LTPO technology in either device suggests both will rely on adaptive refresh rate switching to conserve battery, but the Nord CE5’s brighter panel will likely be more enjoyable in most scenarios.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for either device, a direct comparison is challenging. However, given the market positioning, it’s reasonable to assume the Nord CE5 benefits from a more advanced image signal processor (ISP) integrated within the Dimensity 8350 Apex. Motorola often prioritizes software optimization for natural-looking images, while OnePlus tends towards more vibrant, saturated colors. The absence of information regarding sensor size and optical image stabilization (OIS) makes it difficult to assess low-light performance, but the newer chipset in the Nord CE5 likely provides superior image processing capabilities.
Performance
The performance gap between these two devices is significant. The OnePlus Nord CE5’s Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Apex, built on a 4nm process, features a more modern CPU architecture – a combination of Cortex-A715 cores – and a higher clock speed (up to 3.35 GHz) compared to the Motorola Edge 20 Fusion’s Dimensity 800U (7nm) with its Cortex-A76 cores peaking at 2.4 GHz. This translates to noticeably faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and improved gaming performance on the Nord CE5. The 4nm process also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling during sustained workloads. The Edge 20 Fusion, while adequate for everyday tasks, will struggle with more demanding applications.
Battery Life
The OnePlus Nord CE5 offers a compelling battery and charging combination. While the exact battery capacity isn’t specified, its 61:48h endurance score indicates strong battery life. Crucially, the 80W wired charging is a standout feature, allowing for incredibly fast top-ups. Bypass charging further enhances convenience by allowing you to use the phone while charging without generating excessive heat. The Motorola Edge 20 Fusion’s 30W charging is considerably slower, requiring significantly more time to reach a full charge. The Nord CE5’s faster charging effectively mitigates any potential battery capacity differences.
Buying Guide
Buy the OnePlus Nord CE5 if you prioritize performance for demanding apps and games, and value incredibly fast charging. This phone is ideal for power users and those who frequently find themselves needing to top up their battery quickly. Buy the Motorola Edge 20 Fusion if you are on a tighter budget and prioritize a clean software experience with a focus on simplicity, accepting a performance trade-off.