OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite vs vivo iQOO Z7: The Ultimate Budget Showdown

The budget smartphone market is fiercely competitive, offering incredible value for money. Two contenders vying for your attention are the OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite and the vivo iQOO Z7. Both promise impressive features without breaking the bank, but which one truly delivers?
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

The iQOO Z7 edges out the Nord CE 3 Lite thanks to its superior Dimensity 920 chipset, offering noticeably better performance. While the Nord CE 3 Lite boasts faster charging, the iQOO Z7's overall speed and efficiency make it the more compelling choice for most users.

PHONES
Phone Names OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite vivo iQOO Z7
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - InternationalHSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41
5G bands1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International1, 3, 8, 28, 77, 78 SA/NSA
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5GHSPA, LTE, 5G
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5GGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G
 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - India-
Launch
Announced2023, April 042023, March 17
StatusAvailable. Released 2023, April 11Available. Released 2023, March 21
Body
BuildGlass front, plastic frame, plastic back-
Dimensions165.5 x 76 x 8.3 mm (6.52 x 2.99 x 0.33 in)158.9 x 73.5 x 7.8 mm (6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight195 g (6.88 oz)173 g (6.10 oz)
 -IP54, dust and water resistant
Display
ProtectionCorning Gorilla GlassSchott Xensation glass
Resolution1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~391 ppi density)1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~413 ppi density)
Size6.72 inches, 109.6 cm2 (~87.1% screen-to-body ratio)6.38 inches, 98.3 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeIPS LCD, 120Hz, 550 nits (typ), 680 nits (peak)AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver)Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
ChipsetQualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm)Mediatek Dimensity 920 (6 nm)
GPUAdreno 619Mali-G68 MC4
OSAndroid 13, OxygenOS 13.1Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, Funtouch 14
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)
Internal128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM
 UFS 2.2UFS 2.2
Main Camera
Dual-64 MP, (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS Auxiliary lens
FeaturesLED flash, HDR, panoramaLED flash, HDR, panorama
Triple108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens-
Video1080p@30fps4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps
Selfie camera
FeaturesHDR, panorama-
Single16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1.0µm16 MP, f/2.0, (wide)
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Sound
3.5mm jack YesYes
35mm jackYesYes
Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakersYes
Comms
Bluetooth5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD5.2, A2DP, LE
NFCYes (market/region dependent)No
PositioningGPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSSGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
RadioNoUnspecified
USBUSB Type-C 2.0, OTGUSB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-bandWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Battery
Charging67W wired, 80% in 30 min44W wired, 50% in 25 min
TypeLi-Po 5000 mAh4500 mAh
Misc
ColorsPastel Lime, Chromatic GrayNorway Blue, Pacific Night
ModelsCPH2467, CPH2465I2207
Price£ 169.98 / € 209.99About 200 EUR
SAR1.17 W/kg (head)     0.70 W/kg (body)1.15 W/kg (head)     0.84 W/kg (body)
Tests
Performance AnTuTu: 412006 (v9) GeekBench: 2052 (v5) GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)-

OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite

  • Faster Charging (67W)
  • Familiar OnePlus Software
  • Potentially better detail in well-lit photos (108MP camera)

  • Less Powerful Chipset
  • Likely LCD Display
  • Potentially less efficient performance

vivo iQOO Z7

  • More Powerful Chipset (Dimensity 920)
  • Likely AMOLED Display
  • Better Gaming Performance

  • Slower Charging (44W)
  • vivo's Funtouch OS (subjective)
  • Potentially less detail in well-lit photos (64MP camera)

Display Comparison

Both phones feature a 6.67-inch FHD+ display, likely with a 120Hz refresh rate. However, panel technology (AMOLED vs LCD) is crucial. The iQOO Z7 is expected to have an AMOLED display, offering better contrast and vibrant colors compared to the Nord CE 3 Lite's likely LCD panel. Viewing angles and outdoor visibility will also differ.

Camera Comparison

The Nord CE 3 Lite is expected to have a 108MP main camera, potentially offering more detail in well-lit conditions. The iQOO Z7 likely features a 64MP main camera. Image processing and software optimization will be key differentiators. Low-light performance and video recording capabilities should be evaluated closely.

Performance

The iQOO Z7's Mediatek Dimensity 920 chipset is significantly more powerful than the Nord CE 3 Lite's Snapdragon 695 5G. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the iQOO Z7. The Dimensity 920's architecture and manufacturing process give it a clear advantage.

Battery Life

The Nord CE 3 Lite's 67W charging is a significant advantage, allowing for quicker top-ups. The iQOO Z7's 44W charging is still respectable, but slower. Both phones likely have a similar battery capacity (around 5000mAh), so battery life should be comparable under moderate usage.

Buying Guide

The OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite is ideal for users prioritizing fast charging and a familiar OnePlus experience. The vivo iQOO Z7 is a better fit for those seeking a smoother, faster experience for gaming and everyday tasks, even if it means slightly slower charging.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The vivo iQOO Z7 is significantly better for gaming due to its more powerful Dimensity 920 chipset.
❓ Does the Nord CE 3 Lite have a better camera?
On paper, the Nord CE 3 Lite has a higher megapixel count (108MP), but image quality depends on software and sensor size. Real-world testing is needed to determine the true winner.