OnePlus Nord 5 vs Motorola Edge 40 Neo: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and faster charging, the OnePlus Nord 5 is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 chipset and 80W charging significantly outperform the Edge 40 Neo. However, the Edge 40 Neo offers a respectable experience at a potentially lower price point.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | OnePlus Nord 5 | Motorola Edge 40 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, July 08 | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, July 08 | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 7i), glass back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.4 x 77 x 8.1 mm (6.43 x 3.03 x 0.32 in) | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 211 g (7.44 oz) | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i, Mohs level 6 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1272 x 2800 pixels (~450 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.83 inches, 113.3 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Swift AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, 3840Hz PWM, HDR10+, 800 nits (typ), 1400 nits (HBM), 1800 nits (peak) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 735 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 4 major Android upgrades, OxygenOS 15 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 116˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm, AF | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | LED flash, Ultra HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, 21mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 33W PPS, 18W PD, 100% in just 54 min 5W reverse wired Bypass charging | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | Market-dependent versions:· 5200 mAh (Europe)· 6800 mAh (Global) | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Phantom Grey, Dry Ice, Marble Sands | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | CPH2709 | XT2307-1 |
| Price | £ 339.00 / € 294.97 / ₹ 31,998 | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
| SAR | 1.18 W/kg (head) 0.90 W/kg (body) | - |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 49:12h endurance, 1200 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class C (90 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
OnePlus Nord 5
- Significantly faster processor (Snapdragon 8s Gen 3)
- Much faster charging (80W)
- Brighter display (1330 nits)
- Potentially higher price
- May run hotter under sustained load (though 4nm helps)
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- Potentially more affordable
- Sleek design and build quality
- Balanced performance for everyday tasks
- Slower processor (Dimensity 7030)
- Slower charging (68W)
- Dimmer display (1073 nits)
Display Comparison
The OnePlus Nord 5 boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured peak brightness of 1330 nits, compared to the Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s 1073 nits. This translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While both likely utilize OLED panels, the Nord 5’s higher brightness and potential for a higher refresh rate (not specified, but likely 120Hz given the chipset) provide a more vibrant and responsive visual experience. The lack of LTPO specification for either phone means both will likely rely on adaptive refresh rate switching rather than variable refresh rate for power saving.
Camera Comparison
The provided data lacks detailed camera specifications, making a direct comparison challenging. However, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo is marketed with a focus on photo and video capabilities, suggesting a potentially more refined camera system. Without sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to assess image quality. It's reasonable to assume the Nord 5 will leverage the ISP capabilities of the Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 for improved image processing, but the Edge 40 Neo may offer more specialized camera features. We can safely assume both phones will include a standard wide, ultrawide, and potentially a macro lens, but the quality will vary significantly.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The OnePlus Nord 5’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4nm) is a significant step up from the Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6nm). The Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 features a more advanced CPU architecture – a Cortex-X4 prime core alongside Cortex-A720 performance cores – offering superior single-core and multi-core performance. The 4nm process node also contributes to better thermal efficiency, potentially mitigating throttling during sustained workloads. The Dimensity 7030, while capable, relies on older Cortex-A78 cores and a less efficient 6nm process, resulting in lower peak performance and potentially more heat generation. This difference will be most noticeable in demanding games and resource-intensive applications.
Battery Life
The OnePlus Nord 5 claims an impressive 49:12h endurance rating and a 13:47h active use score, suggesting excellent battery life. Crucially, it supports 80W wired charging, capable of fully charging the device in just 54 minutes, alongside 33W PPS and 18W PD. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo, with an 80h endurance rating (likely a marketing figure, given the 10:28h active use score), lags behind in battery performance. Its 68W charging is faster than many competitors, reaching 50% in 15 minutes, but it’s still slower than the Nord 5’s 80W solution. The Nord 5 also offers 5W reverse wired charging and bypass charging, features absent in the Edge 40 Neo.
Buying Guide
Buy the OnePlus Nord 5 if you need uncompromising performance for gaming and demanding applications, and value the convenience of incredibly fast charging. You're willing to pay a premium for these features. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you prioritize a sleek design, a smooth user experience for everyday tasks, and are looking for a more budget-friendly option without sacrificing essential features.