OnePlus Nord 2T vs Motorola Edge 40: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Motorola Edge 40 edges out the Nord 2T thanks to its significantly brighter display, faster charging, and more modern chipset. While the Nord 2T boasts impressive battery life, the Edge 40's overall package makes it the slightly better choice for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | OnePlus Nord 2T | Motorola Edge 40 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 19 | 2023, May 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, May 21 | Available. Released 2023, May 04 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame | Glass front, aluminum frame, plastic back or eco leather back |
| Dimensions | 159.1 x 73.2 x 8.2 mm (6.26 x 2.88 x 0.32 in) | 158.4 x 72 x 7.6 mm (6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 167 g or 171 g (5.89 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ | P-OLED, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1300 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8020 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, OxygenOS 14 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.4, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | - |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, HDR10, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Auto HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| - | Moto Ready For support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, PD | 68W wired 15W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4400 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Gray Shadow, Jade Fog | Nebula Green, Lunar Blue, Eclipse Black, Viva Magenta |
| Models | CPH2399, CPH2401 | XT2303-2 |
| Price | € 144.39 / $ 169.99 / ₹ 31,490 | € 202.03 / $ 419.99 / £ 199.00 / ₹ 29,999 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 100h | Endurance rating 98h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -25.6 LUFS (Very good) | -24.2 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 490545 (v8) | 604467 (v9) GeekBench: 2790 (v5.1) GFXBench: 40fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 688347 (v9) GeekBench: 3320 (v5.1), 3603 (v6) GFXBench: 33fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
OnePlus Nord 2T
- Exceptional battery life
- Fast 80W charging
- Reliable performance
- Good value for money
- Older chipset
- Lower display brightness
- No wireless charging
Motorola Edge 40
- Brighter, more vibrant display
- Faster charging (wired & wireless)
- More modern chipset
- Sleek design
- Slightly shorter battery life
- Potentially higher price
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 40 absolutely dominates in the display department. Its 1043 nits peak brightness is a massive leap over the Nord 2T's 636 nits, making it far more usable outdoors and offering a more immersive viewing experience. Both have excellent contrast ratios (infinite, nominally), but the Edge 40's brightness is the key differentiator. Both likely use OLED panels, offering vibrant colors and deep blacks.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is likely comparable, though the Edge 40 might have a slight edge in image processing due to its newer chipset. Both phones likely feature a main sensor around 50MP, an ultrawide lens, and a macro lens. Video recording capabilities are likely similar, supporting 4K at 30fps. Low-light performance will be a key area to evaluate in a more in-depth camera test.
Performance
The Motorola Edge 40's Dimensity 8020 chipset is a newer and generally more efficient chip than the Nord 2T's Dimensity 1300. While both are capable of handling everyday tasks and gaming, the Edge 40 should offer smoother performance and better future-proofing. The CPU configurations are similar, but the Dimensity 8020's architecture provides an advantage. Both phones will likely have 8GB or 12GB of RAM.
Battery Life
The OnePlus Nord 2T holds a slight advantage in battery endurance, boasting a rated 100 hours compared to the Edge 40's 98 hours. However, the Edge 40's 68W wired charging is significantly faster than the Nord 2T's 80W, potentially offsetting the slight difference in battery life. The Edge 40 also includes 15W wireless charging, a feature absent on the Nord 2T.
Buying Guide
The OnePlus Nord 2T is ideal for users prioritizing exceptional battery life and a proven, reliable performance. The Motorola Edge 40 is perfect for those who value a vibrant display, faster charging speeds, and a more contemporary design and chipset.