OnePlus Ace vs Xiaomi 13T Pro: Which Dimensity Powerhouse Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi 13T Pro emerges as the stronger overall package. Its Dimensity 9200+ chipset delivers a noticeable performance uplift, coupled with excellent battery life (11:50h active use). While the OnePlus Ace’s 150W charging is incredibly fast, the 13T Pro’s more efficient processor and larger battery provide a more balanced experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | OnePlus Ace | Xiaomi 13T Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, April 21 | 2023, September 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 26 | Available. Released 2023, September 26 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back or silicone polymer back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.3 x 75.5 x 8.2 mm (6.43 x 2.97 x 0.32 in) | 162.2 x 75.7 x 8.5 mm (6.39 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 200 g or 206 g (7.05 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~87.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 144Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1200 nits (HBM), 2600 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-X3 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8100 Max (5 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9200+ (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Immortalis-G715 MC11 |
| OS | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Leica lens, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | - |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/1.9, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.88", 0.61µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 15mm (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@24fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 4K/1080p@30fps HDR10+, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; 10-bit LOG, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, HDR10+ |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | - |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), GALILEO (E1+E5a), NavIC (L5), BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual/tri-band (market/region dependent), Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 150W wired, 50% in 5 min | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 19 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue | Alpine Blue, Meadow Green, Black |
| Models | PGKM10 | 23078PND5G |
| Price | About 360 EUR | $ 370.00 / £ 482.55 / € 301.99 |
| SAR EU | - | 1.00 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
OnePlus Ace
- Incredibly fast 150W charging
- Potentially lower price point
- Solid performance for everyday tasks
- Older Dimensity 8100 Max chipset
- Unknown battery capacity and endurance
- Limited camera information
Xiaomi 13T Pro
- Powerful Dimensity 9200+ chipset
- Excellent battery life (11:50h active use)
- Bright and likely high-quality display (1094 nits)
- Slightly slower 120W charging than the Ace
- Potentially higher price
- Camera details are limited in provided data
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi 13T Pro takes a clear lead in display quality, achieving a measured peak brightness of 1094 nits. While the OnePlus Ace’s display specs aren’t provided, the 13T Pro’s high brightness ensures excellent visibility outdoors. The 13T Pro likely benefits from a more advanced panel technology, potentially including LTPO for adaptive refresh rates, contributing to better power efficiency. Without specific details on the Ace’s panel, it’s difficult to assess color accuracy or viewing angles, but the 13T Pro sets a high bar.
Camera Comparison
The context data only mentions 'Photo / Video' capabilities for the Xiaomi 13T Pro, lacking specific sensor details. However, given its positioning, we can expect a flagship-level camera system with a large main sensor and optical image stabilization (OIS). The OnePlus Ace’s camera specs are also absent, making a direct comparison impossible. It’s reasonable to assume the 13T Pro will offer more advanced image processing algorithms and potentially better low-light performance due to its more powerful ISP. We’d caution against relying on any 2MP macro lenses either phone might include.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the OnePlus Ace utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 8100 Max (5nm), while the Xiaomi 13T Pro features the Dimensity 9200+ (4nm). The 9200+’s newer architecture – featuring a Cortex-X3 prime core clocked at 3.35 GHz versus the Ace’s Cortex-A78 at 2.85 GHz – translates to significantly improved CPU performance. The 4nm process node of the 9200+ also offers superior thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling during extended gaming sessions. While both phones likely feature LPDDR5X RAM, the 9200+'s GPU will provide a more substantial graphics performance boost.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi 13T Pro boasts impressive battery endurance, achieving 11:50h of active use and an endurance rating of 102 hours. While the OnePlus Ace’s battery capacity is unknown, its 150W wired charging is its standout feature, capable of adding 50% charge in just 5 minutes. The 13T Pro’s 120W charging (with PD3.0 and QC4 support) is still very fast, reaching 100% in 19 minutes. However, the 9200+'s 4nm efficiency means the 13T Pro can deliver longer real-world usage despite a potentially similar battery capacity.
Buying Guide
Buy the OnePlus Ace if you absolutely prioritize the fastest possible charging speeds and frequently top up your phone throughout the day. Its 150W charging can add 50% charge in just 5 minutes. Buy the Xiaomi 13T Pro if you value sustained performance for gaming and demanding tasks, alongside all-day battery life and a brighter, more versatile display. It’s the better choice for power users and those who don’t want to be tethered to a charger.