OnePlus Ace vs Oppo Find X7: A Detailed Comparison of Mediatek Flagships
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Oppo Find X7 emerges as the superior choice. The Dimensity 9300’s architectural advancements and improved efficiency deliver a noticeable performance uplift, justifying the price difference. While the OnePlus Ace’s 150W charging is undeniably faster, the Find X7’s 100W charging is still remarkably quick and paired with a more powerful processor.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | OnePlus Ace | Oppo Find X7 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 4, 5 , 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, April 21 | 2024, January 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 26 | Available. Released 2024, January 12 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back or eco leather back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.3 x 75.5 x 8.2 mm (6.43 x 2.97 x 0.32 in) | 162.7 x 75.4 x 8.7 mm or 9.0 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 202 g or 206 g (7.13 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1264 x 2780 pixels (~450 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~87.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.7 cm2 (~91.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1600 nits (typ), 2300 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.25 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8100 Max (5 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9300 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Immortalis-G720 MC12 |
| OS | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 | Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Hasselblad Color Calibration, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | - |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", PDAF, OIS 64 MP, f/2.6, 70mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 3x optical zoom, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video, Dolby Vision |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, PDAF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | - |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 150W wired, 50% in 5 min | 100W wired, PD, 50% in 10 min, 100% in 26 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue | Black, Dark Blue, Light Brown, Purple |
| Models | PGKM10 | PHZ110 |
| Price | About 360 EUR | About 520 EUR |
OnePlus Ace
- Blazing-fast 150W charging
- Excellent value for money
- Capable performance for everyday tasks
- Older Dimensity 8100 Max chipset
- Potentially less refined camera system
Oppo Find X7
- Cutting-edge Dimensity 9300 chipset
- Superior performance and efficiency
- Likely improved camera capabilities
- Slower 100W charging (though still fast)
- Higher price point
Display Comparison
Context data lacks display specifics, but given their market positioning, we can infer differences. The Oppo Find X7, as a flagship, likely features a higher-resolution display with potentially LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates, contributing to better battery life. The Ace likely uses a high refresh rate panel, but may lack LTPO. Bezels are expected to be minimal on both, but the Find X7 likely has a slight edge in color accuracy and peak brightness due to its flagship status.
Camera Comparison
Without specific sensor details, we can analyze based on brand tendencies. Oppo typically invests heavily in camera technology. The Find X7 likely features a larger main sensor with advanced image processing algorithms, potentially including features like computational photography and improved low-light performance. The Ace will likely offer a capable camera system, but may prioritize value over cutting-edge features. The Find X7’s image signal processor (ISP) within the Dimensity 9300 will also contribute to superior image quality and faster processing speeds. We can expect Oppo to leverage its MariSilicon X NPU for enhanced AI-powered image enhancements.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo Find X7’s Dimensity 9300, fabricated on a 4nm process, boasts a significant architectural upgrade over the OnePlus Ace’s 5nm Dimensity 8100 Max. The 9300’s unique CPU configuration – 1x3.25 GHz Cortex-X4, 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4, and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720 – provides superior single-core and multi-core performance. The Cortex-X4 cores are a substantial leap over the Cortex-A78 cores in the 8100 Max. This translates to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and improved gaming performance. While both utilize LPDDR5x RAM, the 9300’s more efficient design will likely result in better thermal management under sustained load, reducing throttling.
Battery Life
The OnePlus Ace’s 150W wired charging is its standout feature, achieving 50% charge in just 5 minutes. The Oppo Find X7’s 100W charging, while slower, still delivers a 50% charge in 10 minutes and a full charge in 26 minutes – a respectable time. The actual battery capacity is unknown, but the Dimensity 9300’s improved efficiency in the Find X7 could offset a potentially smaller battery size, resulting in comparable real-world battery life. The Ace’s faster charging is ideal for quick top-ups, while the Find X7 offers a more balanced approach.
Buying Guide
Buy the OnePlus Ace if you absolutely prioritize the fastest possible charging speeds and are on a tighter budget. It’s ideal for users who frequently top up their phones and need a reliable performer for everyday tasks. Buy the Oppo Find X7 if you demand the best possible performance for demanding applications like gaming and video editing, and appreciate the benefits of a newer, more efficient chipset. It’s geared towards power users who want a premium experience.