The Xiaomi Redmi K60 Pro and OnePlus Ace Racing represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. The K60 Pro arrives with Qualcomm’s flagship Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, while the Ace Racing leverages the proven Mediatek Dimensity 8100 Max. This comparison dissects their key differences, focusing on performance, charging, and overall value to help you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and the fastest charging speeds, the Xiaomi Redmi K60 Pro is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset delivers a noticeable advantage in demanding tasks. However, the OnePlus Ace Racing offers a strong value proposition, providing excellent performance for its price and a respectable charging experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | CDMA2000 1x |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 17 | 2022, December 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, May 31 | Available. Released 2023, January 01 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 164.3 x 75.8 x 8.7 mm (6.47 x 2.98 x 0.34 in) | 162.8 x 75.4 x 8.6 mm or 8.9 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 205 g (7.23 oz) | 201 g or 205 g (7.09 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.59 inches, 104.5 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 (HBM) | OLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1400 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8100 Max (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 | Android 13, MIUI 14 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.0
UFS 3.1 - 128GB only |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.1, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) | 54 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.49", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 720p@1920fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.1, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 16 MP, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30/60/120fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a+Bc), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, 80% in 29 min | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 100% in 19 min
30W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue | Black, White, Mint, Champion Black |
| Models | PGZ110 | 22127RK46C |
| Price | About 280 EUR | About 460 EUR |
OnePlus Ace Racing
- Excellent value for money
- Capable Dimensity 8100 Max performance
- Respectable 67W fast charging
- Likely a balanced feature set
- Chipset is a generation behind the K60 Pro
- No wireless charging support
Xiaomi Redmi K60 Pro
- Flagship Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 performance
- Ultra-fast 120W wired charging
- 30W wireless charging support
- Advanced ISP for superior camera performance
- Higher price point
- May run slightly warmer under sustained load
Display Comparison
While display specifications aren't provided, both devices likely feature high refresh rate AMOLED panels, common in this price bracket. However, the K60 Pro, given its flagship positioning, may benefit from a slightly higher peak brightness and potentially LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates, improving power efficiency. The Ace Racing, focusing on value, might utilize a standard AMOLED panel. Bezels are expected to be minimal on both, but the K60 Pro’s build quality may be marginally superior.
Camera Comparison
Without specific camera specs, we can infer that the K60 Pro, as the higher-end device, likely features a larger main sensor and more sophisticated image processing algorithms. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is also more advanced, enabling better low-light performance and dynamic range. While the Ace Racing will likely offer a competent camera system, the K60 Pro is expected to deliver more detailed and vibrant photos and videos. The inclusion of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) is more probable on the K60 Pro, further enhancing image quality.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Redmi K60 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm) boasts a significantly more powerful CPU configuration – a 1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 prime core, paired with Cortex-A715 and A710 performance cores – compared to the OnePlus Ace Racing’s Dimensity 8100 Max (5nm). This translates to faster application launches, smoother multitasking, and superior gaming performance. The 4nm process of the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 also offers better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling during sustained workloads. The Ace Racing’s Dimensity 8100 Max remains a very capable chip, but it’s a generation behind. Both devices likely utilize LPDDR5X RAM, but the Snapdragon’s superior GPU will be the deciding factor for graphically intensive tasks.
Battery Life
The Redmi K60 Pro’s 120W wired charging is a game-changer, achieving a full charge in just 19 minutes. This is significantly faster than the OnePlus Ace Racing’s 67W charging, which takes 29 minutes to reach 80%. The K60 Pro also adds 30W wireless charging, a feature absent on the Ace Racing. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging of the K60 Pro effectively mitigates any potential disadvantage from a slightly smaller battery size. The K60 Pro’s support for PD3.0 and QC3+ also ensures wider compatibility with various chargers.
Buying Guide
Buy the OnePlus Ace Racing if you need a capable all-rounder that doesn’t break the bank, prioritizing a balance of performance and affordability. It’s ideal for everyday use, moderate gaming, and users who don’t require the absolute fastest processing speeds. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi K60 Pro if you demand top-tier performance for gaming, content creation, or heavy multitasking, and are willing to pay a premium for the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 and its associated benefits, including faster app loading and smoother graphics.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 in the K60 Pro get noticeably hotter than the Dimensity 8100 Max during extended gaming sessions?
While the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 is more powerful, its 4nm process is also more efficient. However, pushing the chip to its limits during prolonged gaming will generate heat. The K60 Pro likely incorporates advanced cooling solutions to mitigate this, but some thermal throttling is possible. The Ace Racing’s Dimensity 8100 Max will likely run cooler, but at the cost of peak performance.
❓ Does the 67W charging on the OnePlus Ace Racing feel significantly slower in real-world use compared to the 120W on the K60 Pro?
Yes, the difference is substantial. While 67W is still considered fast charging, 120W can top up the battery from 0-100% in under 20 minutes. The Ace Racing’s 67W charging will take considerably longer, making the K60 Pro a better choice for users who frequently need a quick power boost.
❓ Is the performance difference between these two phones noticeable for everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and video streaming?
For typical daily usage, the difference will be minimal. Both phones are more than capable of handling these tasks smoothly. However, when launching demanding apps or multitasking heavily, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 in the K60 Pro will exhibit a noticeable advantage in responsiveness and speed.
