The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the OnePlus Ace Racing and Xiaomi Poco X4 GT are two strong contenders. Both offer impressive specs and features at attractive price points, but which one truly comes out on top? Let's dive into a comprehensive comparison to help you decide.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Poco X4 GT edges out the Ace Racing with its faster charging and potentially better display brightness. However, the Ace Racing might offer slightly better overall performance due to software optimization and potentially a more refined user experience. It's a close call, depending on your priorities.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 17 | 2022, June 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, May 31 | Available. Released 2022, June 27 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 164.3 x 75.8 x 8.7 mm (6.47 x 2.98 x 0.34 in) | 163.6 x 74.3 x 8.9 mm (6.44 x 2.93 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 205 g (7.23 oz) | 200 g (7.05 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~407 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.59 inches, 104.5 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 (HBM) | IPS LCD, 144Hz, HDR10, Dolby Vision, 500 nits (typ), 650 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8100 Max (5 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8100 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| OS | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 | Android 12, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.1, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.9 (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.1, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, 80% in 29 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 46 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5080 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue | Black, Blue, Silver |
| Models | PGZ110 | 22041216G, 22041216UG |
| Price | About 280 EUR | About 240 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 0.92 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 112h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1190:1 |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-27.4 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 747871 (v9)
GeekBench: 3719 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 46fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
OnePlus Ace Racing
- Potentially smoother software experience
- Likely better long-term software support
- Slightly faster charging (to 80%)
- Less detailed camera specs available
- Potentially slightly lower peak brightness
- Charging time to 100% is longer
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
- Faster charging to 100%
- Excellent battery life (112h endurance rating)
- Potentially brighter display
- Competitive price
- Xiaomi's MIUI can be divisive
- Potentially less frequent software updates
- Camera details are limited
Display Comparison
Both phones feature AMOLED displays with a 1190:1 contrast ratio, promising excellent blacks and vibrant colors. The Poco X4 GT boasts a measured peak brightness of 600 nits, which could offer a slight advantage in outdoor visibility. The Ace Racing's display is likely comparable, but specific brightness measurements are harder to find. Refresh rates are likely 120Hz on both.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are sparse in the provided data. Both phones are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities. Expect similar camera performance in well-lit conditions. Low-light performance and video recording quality will likely depend on software processing and sensor size, which aren't specified. We'd need more detailed camera specs and sample images for a proper comparison.
Performance
Both devices are powered by the Mediatek Dimensity 8100 chipset, with the Ace Racing utilizing the 'Max' variant. While the core specs are identical, OnePlus's OxygenOS (or ColorOS depending on the region) is often optimized for smoother performance and better resource management. Real-world performance will likely be very similar, but OnePlus might have a slight edge in responsiveness.
Battery Life
The Poco X4 GT boasts an impressive endurance rating of 112h, suggesting excellent battery life. The Ace Racing's battery capacity is likely around 5000mAh, which is competitive. While the Ace Racing charges at 67W (80% in 29 minutes), the Poco X4 GT charges at 67W with PD3.0 (100% in 46 minutes). The Poco X4 GT's longer endurance rating gives it a clear advantage in battery performance.
Buying Guide
The OnePlus Ace Racing is ideal for users prioritizing smooth performance, a clean software experience, and potentially better long-term software support. The Xiaomi Poco X4 GT is a great choice for those seeking the fastest charging speeds, a vibrant display, and a slightly more budget-friendly price.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better battery life?
The Xiaomi Poco X4 GT has a significantly higher endurance rating (112h), suggesting superior battery life compared to the OnePlus Ace Racing.
❓ Is the OnePlus Ace Racing worth the extra money?
It depends on your priorities. If you value a smoother software experience and potentially better long-term support, the Ace Racing might be worth the slight premium. Otherwise, the Poco X4 GT offers excellent value with its fast charging and long battery life.
