OnePlus Ace Racing vs Xiaomi 13T: A Deep Dive into Dimensity Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-day battery life and a brighter, more vibrant display, the Xiaomi 13T is the stronger choice. Its Dimensity 8200 Ultra and impressive 12:23h active use score outweigh the Ace Racing’s slightly more aggressive pricing. However, gamers on a budget will find the Ace Racing’s Dimensity 8100 Max a capable performer.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | OnePlus Ace Racing | Xiaomi 13T |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 17 | 2023, September 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, May 31 | Available. Released 2023, September 26 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back or silicone polymer back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.3 x 75.8 x 8.7 mm (6.47 x 2.98 x 0.34 in) | 162.2 x 75.7 x 8.5 mm (6.39 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 205 g (7.23 oz) | 193 g or 197 g (6.81 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.59 inches, 104.5 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 (HBM) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 144Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1200 nits (HBM), 2600 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8100 Max (5 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 Ultra (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| OS | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Leica lens, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.1, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/1.9, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.88", 0.61µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 15mm (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps (HDR10+), 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.1, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, HDR10+ |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, 80% in 29 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue | Alpine Blue, Meadow Green, Black |
| Models | PGZ110 | 2306EPN60G |
| Price | About 280 EUR | $ 255.96 / £ 326.27 / € 204.18 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
OnePlus Ace Racing
- Excellent performance for the price with Dimensity 8100 Max
- Fast initial charging (80% in 29 minutes)
- Potentially more affordable than the Xiaomi 13T
- Less efficient 5nm process may lead to more throttling
- Likely a less impressive display compared to the 13T
- Battery life is expected to be shorter than the 13T
Xiaomi 13T
- Superior battery life (12:23h active use)
- Brighter and more vibrant display (1264 nits)
- More powerful and efficient Dimensity 8200 Ultra
- Slightly slower full charge time (42 minutes)
- Potentially higher price point
- May not offer the absolute lowest price in the mid-range segment
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi 13T boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1264 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Ace Racing. This higher peak brightness translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While both likely utilize AMOLED panels, the 13T’s superior brightness and potentially wider color gamut offer a more immersive viewing experience. The Ace Racing’s display specifications are less detailed, suggesting a more cost-optimized panel.
Camera Comparison
The context data for both devices is limited regarding camera specifics. However, given Xiaomi’s history, the 13T likely features a more sophisticated camera system with a larger main sensor and more advanced image processing algorithms. The Ace Racing, positioned as a value-focused device, likely employs a more basic camera setup. While both may include multiple lenses, the 13T’s image quality is expected to be superior, particularly in low-light conditions. We can assume the 13T will offer more versatile shooting modes and better video stabilization.
Performance
Both phones are powered by MediaTek Dimensity chips, but the Xiaomi 13T’s Dimensity 8200 Ultra holds a clear advantage. Built on a more efficient 4nm process versus the Ace Racing’s 5nm Dimensity 8100 Max, the 8200 Ultra offers improved thermal efficiency and sustained performance. The CPU configuration also differs; the 13T features a 1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 core alongside 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 cores, while the Ace Racing has 4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This suggests the 13T will handle multi-threaded tasks and demanding games with greater ease. The 13T’s more advanced chip will benefit users who frequently edit videos or engage in resource-intensive applications.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi 13T shines in battery performance, achieving an impressive 12:23h of active use and an endurance rating of 101 hours. While both phones support 67W wired charging, the 13T takes 42 minutes to reach 100%, while the Ace Racing achieves 80% in 29 minutes. This suggests the Ace Racing prioritizes faster initial charging, while the 13T focuses on a complete charge in a reasonable timeframe. The 13T’s superior battery life will be a significant benefit for users who heavily rely on their smartphones throughout the day.
Buying Guide
Buy the OnePlus Ace Racing if you need a phone primarily for gaming and demanding applications, and are willing to compromise slightly on battery life and display brightness. Its Dimensity 8100 Max delivers excellent performance for the price. Buy the Xiaomi 13T if you prefer a more well-rounded experience with a focus on battery endurance, a brighter and more color-accurate display, and a more refined camera system. It’s ideal for everyday users and content consumers.