The OnePlus Ace Racing and vivo S17 Pro represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. Both leverage MediaTek's Dimensity series, but target slightly different priorities. The Ace Racing emphasizes raw performance at a competitive price, while the S17 Pro focuses on a refined experience with faster charging and potentially better power efficiency. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you choose the right device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and value, the vivo S17 Pro emerges as the stronger contender. Its Dimensity 8200, built on a more efficient 4nm process, offers a performance edge and potentially better thermal management, while the 80W charging provides a slight convenience advantage.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 17 | 2023, May 31 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, May 31 | Available. Released 2023, June 08 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 164.3 x 75.8 x 8.7 mm (6.47 x 2.98 x 0.34 in) | 164.2 x 74.4 x 7.5 mm (6.46 x 2.93 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 205 g (7.23 oz) | 188 g (6.63 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~452 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.59 inches, 104.5 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.5 cm2 (~91.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 (HBM) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8100 Max (5 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| OS | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 | Android 13, OriginOS 3 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.0, (telephoto), PDAF, 2x optical zoom
8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.1, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | Dual-LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.1, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 50 MP, f/2.0, 22mm (wide), AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, 80% in 29 min | 80W wired, 70% in 30 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | 4600 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue | Black, Blue, Silver |
| Models | PGZ110 | V2284A |
| Price | About 280 EUR | About 410 EUR |
OnePlus Ace Racing
- Aggressive pricing for the performance offered.
- Fast 67W charging is still very competitive.
- Dimensity 8100 Max provides excellent gaming performance.
- 5nm process may lead to more thermal throttling.
- Potentially less efficient power consumption compared to the S17 Pro.
vivo S17 Pro
- More efficient Dimensity 8200 (4nm process).
- Faster 80W charging for quicker top-ups.
- Potentially better camera performance due to ISP and image processing.
- Generally priced higher than the OnePlus Ace Racing.
- Performance gains may not be noticeable for casual users.
Display Comparison
While specific display details are absent, both phones likely feature high refresh rate AMOLED panels common in this segment. However, the core difference lies beneath the surface. The chipset's efficiency impacts the display's ability to maintain peak brightness for extended periods. The vivo S17 Pro's Dimensity 8200, being on a 4nm node, should allow for more sustained peak brightness without overheating, potentially offering a better outdoor viewing experience. Bezels and color accuracy are likely comparable, given the brands' focus on aesthetics.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, it's difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, vivo historically prioritizes camera technology, suggesting the S17 Pro likely benefits from more advanced image processing algorithms and potentially a larger main sensor. The Dimensity 8200’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is also newer and more capable than the 8100 Max’s, potentially leading to better dynamic range and low-light performance. While both phones likely include standard features like night mode and portrait mode, the S17 Pro is expected to deliver more refined results.
Performance
The vivo S17 Pro’s Dimensity 8200 represents a clear architectural upgrade over the OnePlus Ace Racing’s Dimensity 8100 Max. The 8200 utilizes a 4nm process versus the 8100 Max’s 5nm, resulting in improved power efficiency and thermal performance. The CPU configuration also differs: the S17 Pro boasts a single 3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 core alongside three additional Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 3.0 GHz, compared to the Ace Racing’s four 2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 cores. This configuration, combined with the process node advantage, translates to faster single-core and multi-core performance for the S17 Pro, particularly in demanding tasks like video editing and complex gaming. The Ace Racing will still deliver excellent performance, but the S17 Pro has the edge in sustained workloads.
Battery Life
The charging speeds are a key differentiator: 80W for the vivo S17 Pro versus 67W for the OnePlus Ace Racing. The S17 Pro claims 70% charge in 30 minutes, while the Ace Racing reaches 80% in 29 minutes. While the Ace Racing is slightly faster to 80%, the S17 Pro’s 80W charging is more efficient overall. The 4nm process of the Dimensity 8200 also contributes to better power efficiency, potentially offsetting any capacity differences (which are currently unknown). This means the S17 Pro could offer comparable or even better real-world battery life despite potentially having a similar or smaller battery capacity.
Buying Guide
Buy the OnePlus Ace Racing if you need maximum gaming performance on a strict budget and are comfortable with potentially more aggressive thermal throttling during extended sessions. Buy the vivo S17 Pro if you prefer a more balanced experience with a focus on efficient performance, faster charging, and a potentially more refined software experience, even if it comes at a slightly higher price point.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Dimensity 8100 Max in the OnePlus Ace Racing struggle with graphically demanding games like Genshin Impact after prolonged play?
The Dimensity 8100 Max is a capable chip, but its 5nm process means it will generate more heat than the 4nm Dimensity 8200 in the vivo S17 Pro. Expect some thermal throttling after 30-45 minutes of intense gaming, potentially leading to frame rate drops. The Ace Racing is still playable, but the S17 Pro will maintain higher sustained performance.
❓ How much faster is the 80W charging on the vivo S17 Pro compared to the 67W charging on the OnePlus Ace Racing in real-world use?
While the Ace Racing charges quickly, the S17 Pro’s 80W charging offers a noticeable advantage. The S17 Pro reaches 70% in 30 minutes, while the Ace Racing reaches 80% in 29 minutes. More importantly, the S17 Pro’s charging is more efficient, meaning less heat generation and potentially better long-term battery health. The difference is most noticeable when topping up from a low battery level.
❓ Does the Dimensity 8200 in the vivo S17 Pro support advanced features like ray tracing in mobile games?
The Dimensity 8200 does support ray tracing, but its implementation varies by game. While some titles offer ray tracing options, the performance impact can be significant. Don't expect a console-level ray tracing experience, but the S17 Pro is capable of handling it in supported games, unlike the Ace Racing.
