OnePlus Ace Racing vs vivo iQOO 11S: A Deep Dive into Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the vivo iQOO 11S is the superior choice. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 offers a significant performance leap over the Dimensity 8100 Max, and the 200W charging is a game-changer. However, the OnePlus Ace Racing remains a strong contender for budget-conscious gamers.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | OnePlus Ace Racing | vivo iQOO 11S |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 17 | 2023, July 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, May 31 | Available. Released 2023, July 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 164.3 x 75.8 x 8.7 mm (6.47 x 2.98 x 0.34 in) | 164.9 x 77.1 x 8.4 mm or 8.7 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 205 g (7.23 oz) | 207 g or 210 g (7.30 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~518 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.59 inches, 104.5 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~87.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 (HBM) | LTPO4 AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8100 Max (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 | Android 13, OriginOS 3 (China) |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.1, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/1.49", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.5, 47mm (telephoto), PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm (ultrawide) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.1, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, 80% in 29 min | 200W wired, PD3.0, UFCS |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | 4700 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue | Black, Sky Blue, Legendary White (BMW M branding) |
| Models | PGZ110 | V2304A |
| Price | About 280 EUR | About 500 EUR |
OnePlus Ace Racing
- More affordable price point
- Solid all-around performance for everyday use
- Respectable 67W fast charging
- Dimensity 8100 Max is outperformed by Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
- Likely lacks the advanced camera features of the iQOO 11S
vivo iQOO 11S
- Exceptional performance with Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
- Blazing-fast 200W wired charging
- Likely superior camera system
- Higher price tag
- May run hotter under sustained load (though the 4nm process helps)
Display Comparison
While display specifications aren't provided, both phones likely feature high refresh rate AMOLED panels, typical of their market segment. The iQOO 11S, being positioned higher, may benefit from a slightly brighter panel and potentially LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates, improving power efficiency. Bezels are expected to be minimal on both, but the iQOO 11S's premium positioning suggests a slight edge in build quality and screen-to-body ratio.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, it's difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, the iQOO 11S, as a higher-tier device, is expected to feature a more sophisticated camera system, potentially with a larger main sensor and optical image stabilization (OIS). Image processing algorithms on the iQOO 11S are also likely to be more advanced, resulting in better dynamic range and low-light performance. The Ace Racing will likely offer a competent camera experience, but may fall short in challenging conditions.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The iQOO 11S’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm) is a substantial upgrade over the OnePlus Ace Racing’s Dimensity 8100 Max (5nm). The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s Cortex-X3 prime core, clocked at 3.2 GHz, delivers significantly higher peak performance. Furthermore, the 4nm process node of the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 provides superior thermal efficiency, reducing throttling during sustained workloads like gaming. The iQOO 11S will excel in graphically intensive tasks and multitasking. The Ace Racing, while capable, will show its limitations in the most demanding scenarios. The iQOO 11S likely utilizes faster LPDDR5x RAM, further enhancing performance.
Battery Life
The iQOO 11S’s 200W wired charging is its standout feature. This technology can fully charge the device in a remarkably short time – likely under 30 minutes. While the Ace Racing’s 67W charging is respectable, it pales in comparison. The actual battery capacity isn’t specified, but the iQOO 11S’s faster charging effectively mitigates any potential disadvantage from a slightly smaller battery. The iQOO 11S also supports PD3.0 and UFCS, offering broader compatibility and potentially faster charging with compatible accessories.
Buying Guide
Buy the OnePlus Ace Racing if you need a capable all-rounder with solid performance for everyday tasks and moderate gaming, and prioritize affordability. Buy the vivo iQOO 11S if you demand the fastest possible performance for demanding games and applications, and value the convenience of incredibly rapid charging – even if it comes at a higher price.