The Realme GT Neo 5 240W and OnePlus Ace Racing represent distinct approaches to the mid-range flagship market. The Realme aggressively prioritizes charging speed, pushing the boundaries with its 240W SuperDart technology. Conversely, the OnePlus Ace Racing focuses on a balanced experience, leveraging the efficient Dimensity 8100 Max chipset. This comparison dissects their strengths and weaknesses to determine which device best suits your priorities.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Realme GT Neo 5 240W is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 offers a noticeable performance edge, and the groundbreaking 240W charging is a game-changer. However, the OnePlus Ace Racing provides excellent value for budget-conscious gamers.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 17 | 2023, February 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, May 31 | Available. Released 2023, February 09 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 164.3 x 75.8 x 8.7 mm (6.47 x 2.98 x 0.34 in) | 163.9 x 75.8 x 8.9 mm (6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 205 g (7.23 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| | - | Illuminated RGB (on the back) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1240 x 2772 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~451 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.59 inches, 104.5 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.74 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~87.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 (HBM) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1400 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8100 Max (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 | Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.1, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, 25mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP, f/3.3, 20mm (microscope) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.1, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, 25mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (dual side) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, 80% in 29 min | 240W wired, 50% in 4 min, 100% in 10 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | 4600 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue | Purple, Black, White |
| Models | PGZ110 | RMX3708 |
| Price | About 280 EUR | About 440 EUR |
OnePlus Ace Racing
- Excellent value for money
- Efficient Dimensity 8100 Max chipset
- Respectable gaming performance
- Slower charging speed (67W)
- Potentially less powerful camera system
Realme GT Neo 5 240W
- Blazing-fast 240W charging
- Powerful Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 processor
- Likely superior camera performance
- Higher price point
- Potential for increased heat under sustained load
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so we must infer. Given the market positioning, both likely feature AMOLED panels with high refresh rates (120Hz+). However, the Realme GT Neo 5, being the more premium offering, likely boasts a slightly higher peak brightness and potentially a more sophisticated color calibration. The Realme's panel may also incorporate LTPO technology for variable refresh rate, improving power efficiency. Bezels are expected to be minimal on both, but the Realme may have a slight edge in screen-to-body ratio.
Camera Comparison
Without specific camera specs, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the Realme GT Neo 5, positioned as a flagship, likely features a more advanced camera system. We can expect a larger main sensor with optical image stabilization (OIS) on the Realme, resulting in better low-light performance and sharper images. The OnePlus Ace Racing likely relies on a more cost-effective sensor setup. While both may include ultrawide and macro lenses, the Realme’s image processing algorithms are likely more refined, offering better dynamic range and color accuracy. The Realme's camera is geared towards enthusiasts, while the OnePlus is more casual.
Performance
The Realme GT Neo 5 240W’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm) demonstrably outperforms the OnePlus Ace Racing’s MediaTek Dimensity 8100 Max (5nm). The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1’s Cortex-X2 prime core, clocked at 3.19 GHz, provides a significant single-core performance boost, crucial for responsive UI and demanding applications. While the Dimensity 8100 Max is no slouch, its Cortex-A78 cores, at 2.85 GHz, are less efficient and offer lower peak performance. The 4nm process node of the Snapdragon also contributes to better thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during sustained workloads. Both devices likely utilize LPDDR5X RAM, but the Snapdragon’s superior GPU will provide a more substantial gaming advantage.
Battery Life
The Realme GT Neo 5 240W’s defining feature is its 240W wired charging, capable of reaching 100% in just 10 minutes. This is a massive advantage over the OnePlus Ace Racing’s 67W charging, which takes 29 minutes to reach 80%. While the OnePlus may have a slightly larger battery capacity (inferred), the Realme’s charging speed effectively mitigates any capacity difference. The Realme’s charging technology is a significant convenience factor for users who frequently need to quickly replenish their battery. The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1's efficiency also helps offset the power draw of the faster charging.
Buying Guide
Buy the OnePlus Ace Racing if you prioritize a smooth, efficient gaming experience and value a more reasonable price point. It’s ideal for users who don’t need the absolute fastest charging or peak performance. Buy the Realme GT Neo 5 240W if you demand the fastest charging available, a more powerful processor for demanding tasks, and are willing to pay a premium for those features. This phone is for power users and those who frequently find themselves needing a quick top-up.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the 240W charging of the Realme GT Neo 5 240W degrade the battery health significantly over time?
Realme has implemented sophisticated battery management and safety protocols to mitigate battery degradation with its 240W SuperDart charging. While all batteries degrade over time, Realme claims its technology minimizes this effect through optimized charging curves and temperature control. However, long-term testing is needed to fully assess the impact.
❓ Is the Dimensity 8100 Max in the OnePlus Ace Racing capable of running demanding games like Genshin Impact at high settings?
Yes, the Dimensity 8100 Max is a capable chipset for gaming. It can run Genshin Impact at high settings with stable frame rates, although you may need to adjust graphics settings slightly for optimal performance and to prevent overheating during extended gaming sessions. It won't match the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, but it provides a very good experience.
❓ Does the Realme GT Neo 5 240W get excessively hot during charging or gaming?
The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is known to generate heat under sustained load. Realme has incorporated advanced cooling solutions, including vapor chamber cooling, to manage thermal throttling. While the phone may get warm during intensive gaming or charging, it shouldn't reach uncomfortable temperatures. The 240W charging is designed to minimize heat buildup during the charging process.
