OnePlus Ace Pro vs. Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Poco F5 Pro offers a brighter display, versatile wireless charging, and impressive battery life, making it a compelling all-rounder. The OnePlus Ace Pro boasts significantly faster wired charging and potentially slightly better optimized performance. Ultimately, the choice depends on your priorities: charging speed or display/battery versatility.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | OnePlus Ace Pro | Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA 800 | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, August 09 | 2023, May 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, August 15 | Available. Released 2023, May |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163 x 75.4 x 8.8 mm (6.42 x 2.97 x 0.35 in) | 162.8 x 75.4 x 8.6 mm (6.41 x 2.97 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 203.5 g (7.20 oz) | 204 g (7.20 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~87.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Fluid AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (HBM), 1400 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm | - |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 150W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 50% in 15 min 30W wireless, 50% in 32 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4800 mAh | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Moonstone Black, Jade Green, Genshin Impact | Black, White |
| Models | PGP110 | 23013PC75G |
| Price | About 500 EUR | $ 449.99 / € 241.85 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.00 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 99h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.2 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 1057977 (v9) GeekBench: 4001 (v5.1), 4009 (v6) GFXBench: 50fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
OnePlus Ace Pro
- Incredibly fast 150W wired charging
- Potentially optimized software for smoother performance
- Powerful Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset
- Less bright display compared to Poco F5 Pro
- No wireless charging
- Camera details are unclear
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
- Brighter 1059 nits display
- Versatile 67W wired and 30W wireless charging
- Excellent battery life (99h endurance)
- Competitive price
- Slightly lower CPU clock speeds
- Camera details are unclear
- Software optimization may not be as refined as OnePlus
Display Comparison
The Poco F5 Pro takes the lead here with a measured peak brightness of 1059 nits, significantly brighter than the Ace Pro's likely (though unconfirmed) brightness. While the Ace Pro's display is likely excellent, the Poco's superior brightness makes it better for outdoor visibility. The Poco F5 Pro also boasts an 'infinite' contrast ratio, suggesting deep blacks and vibrant colors, though this is a nominal value.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are limited in the provided specs. Both are listed as 'Photo / Video'. Based on general knowledge, the Poco F5 Pro likely offers a more versatile camera system, potentially including a wider range of lenses and features. OnePlus typically focuses on computational photography, so image processing could be a differentiator. A deeper dive into camera samples would be needed for a definitive comparison.
Performance
Both phones share the same Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset, ensuring top-tier performance. However, OnePlus often optimizes its software for smoother performance. While the Poco F5 Pro's CPU clock speeds are slightly lower (3.0 GHz vs 3.19 GHz Cortex-X2), the difference is likely negligible in real-world usage. Gaming performance should be comparable on both devices.
Battery Life
The Poco F5 Pro shines in this category with an impressive endurance rating of 99 hours. The OnePlus Ace Pro's battery capacity is likely similar, but the Poco's software optimization and potentially more efficient display contribute to its superior battery life. The Poco F5 Pro also offers both 67W wired and 30W wireless charging, providing greater flexibility.
Buying Guide
The OnePlus Ace Pro is ideal for users who prioritize incredibly fast charging and are comfortable with a potentially less vibrant display. The Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro is a great choice for those seeking a bright, high-quality display, versatile charging options (wired and wireless), and excellent battery endurance at a competitive price.