OnePlus Ace Pro vs Xiaomi 12 Pro (Dimensity): A Deep Dive into Performance and Charging
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the OnePlus Ace Pro emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, coupled with the blistering 150W charging, provides a noticeable edge in sustained performance and convenience. While the Xiaomi 12 Pro’s Dimensity 9000+ is a capable chip, the Ace Pro’s charging speed and overall efficiency give it a decisive advantage.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | OnePlus Ace Pro | Xiaomi 12 Pro (Dimensity) |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA 800 | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, August 09 | 2022, July 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, August 15 | Available. Released 2022, July 13 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, glass back | - |
| Dimensions | 163 x 75.4 x 8.8 mm (6.42 x 2.97 x 0.35 in) | 163.6 x 74.6 x 8.2 mm (6.44 x 2.94 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 203.5 g (7.20 oz) | 201 g (7.09 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~521 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~87.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.73 inches, 109.4 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Fluid AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) | LTPO2 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM), 1500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.20 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9000+ (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Mali-G710 MC10 |
| OS | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 | Android 12, MIUI 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 15mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm 5 MP, f/2.4, 50mm (telephoto macro), AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio Tuned by Harman Kardon | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 150W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4 |
| Type | Li-Po 4800 mAh | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Moonstone Black, Jade Green, Genshin Impact | Gray, Blue |
| Models | PGP110 | 2207122MC |
| Price | About 500 EUR | About 570 EUR |
OnePlus Ace Pro
- Blazing-fast 150W charging
- Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 offers excellent performance
- Potentially better thermal management
- Software experience may be less polished than Xiaomi's
- Availability may be limited in some regions
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Dimensity)
- Dimensity 9000+ is a very capable processor
- Potentially more refined software experience (MIUI)
- Wider availability in some markets
- 67W charging is significantly slower than 150W
- May experience more thermal throttling under sustained load
Display Comparison
Both devices utilize 4nm chipsets, suggesting similar power efficiency benefits. However, display specifics are missing. Assuming both feature high refresh rate AMOLED panels (typical for this class), the key differentiator would be peak brightness and color calibration. Given Xiaomi’s history with excellent display quality, the 12 Pro likely boasts slightly better color accuracy out of the box. The absence of LTPO information means we can't assess adaptive refresh rate efficiency, but both likely implement it to some degree. Bezels are expected to be minimal on both.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are limited. However, both phones likely feature a primary sensor in the 50MP range. The Xiaomi 12 Pro’s image processing is typically more saturated and vibrant, appealing to a wider audience. The Ace Pro, leaning towards a more natural look, might appeal to photography enthusiasts. Without specific aperture and sensor size data, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner. The presence of OIS on the main sensor is assumed on both, crucial for stable video recording and low-light photography. We'll disregard the likely inclusion of 2MP macro lenses on both devices as they offer minimal practical benefit.
Performance
The core of this comparison lies in the chipsets. The Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 in the Ace Pro and the MediaTek Dimensity 9000+ in the 12 Pro are both built on a 4nm process, but differ in architecture. The Dimensity 9000+ boasts a slightly higher peak CPU clock speed (3.20 GHz vs 3.19 GHz on the X2 core), but the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is known for its superior thermal management. The Ace Pro’s cooling system, combined with the Snapdragon’s efficiency, should result in less throttling during extended gaming sessions. Both utilize LPDDR5X RAM, ensuring ample memory bandwidth. The GPU performance is closely matched, but the Snapdragon’s Adreno 730 generally holds a slight edge in sustained graphics output.
Battery Life
The OnePlus Ace Pro’s 150W wired charging is its standout feature. This allows for a full charge in under 20 minutes, a significant advantage over the Xiaomi 12 Pro’s 67W charging. While the 12 Pro supports PD3.0 and QC4, the sheer speed of 150W is unmatched. Battery capacity is not specified, but the Ace Pro’s faster charging mitigates the impact of a potentially smaller battery. The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1’s efficiency also contributes to better battery life under heavy load, offsetting any capacity differences.
Buying Guide
Buy the OnePlus Ace Pro if you prioritize raw gaming performance, need the fastest possible charging, and value sustained performance under load. Its 150W charging is a game-changer for power users. Buy the Xiaomi 12 Pro (Dimensity) if you prefer a slightly more refined software experience (depending on MIUI preference) and a potentially more efficient chip for lighter workloads, and if 67W charging is sufficient for your needs. The Xiaomi 12 Pro also benefits from wider availability in some markets.