OnePlus Ace Pro vs Samsung Galaxy A73 5G: A Detailed Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The OnePlus Ace Pro is the clear winner for performance enthusiasts, boasting a Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 and blazing-fast 150W charging. However, the Galaxy A73 5G offers a more polished software experience and a versatile camera system, making it a strong choice for everyday users prioritizing reliability and brand recognition.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | OnePlus Ace Pro | Samsung Galaxy A73 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA 800 | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, August 09 | 2022, March 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, August 15 | Available. Released 2022, April 22 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, glass back | - |
| Dimensions | 163 x 75.4 x 8.8 mm (6.42 x 2.97 x 0.35 in) | 163.7 x 76.1 x 7.6 mm (6.44 x 3.00 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 203.5 g (7.20 oz) | 181 g (6.38 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~87.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~87.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Fluid AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED Plus, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 | Android 12, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 6.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 150W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4800 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Moonstone Black, Jade Green, Genshin Impact | Gray, Mint, White |
| Models | PGP110 | SM-A736B, SM-A736B/DS |
| Price | About 500 EUR | About 600 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.14 W/kg (head) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.28 W/kg (head) 1.42 W/kg (body) |
OnePlus Ace Pro
- Exceptional Performance
- Blazing-Fast Charging (150W)
- High Refresh Rate Display
- Premium Build Quality
- Potentially Less Polished Software
- Camera May Not Be as Versatile
- Availability May Be Limited
Samsung Galaxy A73 5G
- Reliable Software Experience (One UI)
- Versatile Camera System
- Good Battery Life
- Samsung Brand Recognition
- Slower Charging (25W)
- Less Powerful Processor
- Potentially Higher Price
Display Comparison
The OnePlus Ace Pro likely features an AMOLED display with a high refresh rate (likely 120Hz), offering vibrant colors and smooth scrolling. The Galaxy A73 5G also has an AMOLED display, but potentially with a slightly lower refresh rate (90Hz). Brightness and color accuracy will be key differentiators to examine.
Camera Comparison
The Galaxy A73 5G is expected to have a more versatile camera system, potentially with a higher resolution main sensor and a wider range of lenses (ultrawide, macro, depth). While the Ace Pro's camera is capable, the A73 5G's software processing and overall versatility are likely to be stronger. Low-light performance will be a key area of comparison.
Performance
This is where the Ace Pro truly shines. The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is significantly more powerful than the Snapdragon 778G 5G, resulting in noticeably faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and superior gaming performance. Expect the Ace Pro to handle demanding games with ease, while the A73 5G might struggle with the highest settings.
Battery Life
The OnePlus Ace Pro's 150W charging is a game-changer, allowing for incredibly fast top-ups. While the Galaxy A73 5G has a decent battery capacity, its 25W charging is considerably slower. Both phones likely offer all-day battery life with moderate usage, but the Ace Pro provides much faster replenishment.
Buying Guide
The OnePlus Ace Pro is ideal for gamers, power users, and anyone who demands top-tier performance and incredibly fast charging. The Samsung Galaxy A73 5G is a better fit for users who value a smooth, reliable experience, a good camera, and the Samsung ecosystem, without needing the absolute fastest speeds.