OnePlus Ace Pro vs Realme GT2 Pro: A Deep Dive into Speed and Endurance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the OnePlus Ace Pro emerges as the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset delivers demonstrably better performance and thermal management than the GT2 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, coupled with the industry-leading 150W charging. While the GT2 Pro offers a solid experience, the Ace Pro’s speed advantage is undeniable.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | OnePlus Ace Pro | Realme GT2 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA 800 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - China, India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, August 09 | 2022, January 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, August 15 | Available. Released 2022, January 08 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, glass back | - |
| Dimensions | 163 x 75.4 x 8.8 mm (6.42 x 2.97 x 0.35 in) | 163.2 x 74.7 x 8.2 mm (6.43 x 2.94 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 203.5 g (7.20 oz) | 189 / 199 g (6.67 oz) |
| - | Splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1440 x 3216 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~87.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~88.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Fluid AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) | LTPO2 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 1400 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 150˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm 3 MP, f/3.3, 20mm (microscope), AF, 40x magnification |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (dual side) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 150W wired | 65W wired, 100% in 33 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4800 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Moonstone Black, Jade Green, Genshin Impact | Paper White, Paper Green, Steel Black, Titanium Blue |
| Models | PGP110 | RMX3301, RMX3300 |
| Price | About 500 EUR | € 221.41 |
| SAR | - | 1.16 W/kg (head) 0.53 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 117h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.3 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 966251 (v9) GeekBench: 3501 (v5.1) GFXBench: 48fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
OnePlus Ace Pro
- Significantly faster 150W charging
- More powerful Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset
- Potentially better thermal management
- Battery capacity unknown
- Camera specifications not detailed
Realme GT2 Pro
- Solid 117-hour endurance rating
- 778 nits peak brightness
- Potentially more balanced overall experience
- Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 prone to throttling
- Slower 65W charging
Display Comparison
The Realme GT2 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 778 nits, a respectable figure, but the Ace Pro’s display specifications are not provided. Given OnePlus’s history, it likely offers comparable brightness. Both devices feature an 'infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, typical of AMOLED panels. Without further data on the Ace Pro’s panel technology (LTPO, PWM dimming rate), it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner, but the GT2 Pro’s brightness is a known quantity.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but detailed sensor information is lacking. Without specifics on megapixel counts, sensor sizes, or aperture values, a direct comparison is impossible. However, the market positioning suggests the Ace Pro may lean towards a more aggressive, vibrant image processing style, while the GT2 Pro might aim for greater color accuracy. The absence of details on OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) further complicates the assessment. We can assume both will have a standard set of lenses, but the quality will depend on the underlying hardware.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The OnePlus Ace Pro utilizes the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm), a refined version of the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4nm) found in the Realme GT2 Pro. The 8+ Gen 1’s higher clock speeds – 3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 vs 3.00 GHz – and improved efficiency translate to noticeable performance gains, particularly in sustained workloads. The Ace Pro’s CPU architecture, while similar, benefits from the process node improvement, reducing thermal throttling during extended gaming. The GT2 Pro, while powerful, is more prone to heat-related performance drops.
Battery Life
The Realme GT2 Pro has an endurance rating of 117 hours, indicating solid battery life. However, the OnePlus Ace Pro’s 150W wired charging is a game-changer. While the GT2 Pro’s 65W charging reaches 100% in 33 minutes, the Ace Pro’s 150W charging significantly reduces this time, offering a substantial convenience advantage. The Ace Pro’s battery capacity is not specified, but the faster charging mitigates concerns about a potentially smaller battery size.
Buying Guide
Buy the OnePlus Ace Pro if you prioritize raw performance, incredibly fast charging, and sustained gaming sessions. It’s ideal for power users and mobile gamers. Buy the Realme GT2 Pro if you value a slightly more balanced experience with a focus on display quality and potentially longer battery life between charges, and are less concerned with pushing the absolute performance limits.