The OnePlus Ace 6T and Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive flagship-killer space. The Ace 6T, leveraging the Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, aims for a balance of performance and value, while the K70 Pro, powered by the newer Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, pushes the boundaries of Android processing power. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you choose the right device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro emerges as the superior choice. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 offers a significant performance leap over the 8 Gen 5, justifying the potential price difference. While the Ace 6T provides excellent value, the K70 Pro’s raw power and faster charging make it the more future-proof option.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | Expected announcement 2025, November | 2023, November 29 |
| Status | Rumored. Exp. release 2025, December | Available. Released 2023, November 29 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Crystal Shield Glass), aluminum alloy frame, glass back or fiber-reinforced plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | - | 160.9 x 75 x 8.2 mm (6.33 x 2.95 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 209 g (7.37 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Crystal Shield Glass | - |
| Resolution | 1272 x 2800 pixels (~450 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.83 inches, 113.3 cm2 | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 165Hz, PWM, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HDR Vivid | OLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 4000 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core | Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno | Adreno 750 |
| OS | Android 16, ColorOS 16 | Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | Up to 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 24GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | - |
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
50 MP, (telephoto), PDAF, 2x optical zoom
12 MP, (ultrawide) |
| Video | 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 8K@24fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 720p@1920fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, (wide) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, LHDC 5 | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 100W wired
Bypass charging | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 100% in 18 min |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 8300 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Purple, Green | Black, Silver, Blue/Green, Lamborgini Green, Lamborgini Yellow |
| Models | - | 23117RK66C |
| Price | - | About 430 EUR |
OnePlus Ace 6T
- More affordable price point
- Excellent performance for the price
- 100W fast charging is still very quick
- Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 is outperformed by the Gen 3
- Potentially less advanced camera system
Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro
- Significantly faster Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 processor
- Ultra-fast 120W charging with PD3.0/QC3+ support
- Likely superior camera system
- Higher price tag
- May run hotter under sustained load (though the 4nm process helps)
Display Comparison
While specific display details are absent, both phones likely feature high refresh rate AMOLED panels, standard for this segment. However, the Redmi K70 Pro, given its flagship positioning, is expected to boast a higher peak brightness and potentially LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates, leading to improved power efficiency. The Ace 6T, while still offering a vibrant display, may compromise slightly on these premium features to maintain its competitive price.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, Xiaomi typically equips its 'Pro' models with more advanced camera systems. We can anticipate the Redmi K70 Pro featuring a larger main sensor and potentially more sophisticated image processing algorithms. The Ace 6T will likely offer a capable camera experience, but may not match the K70 Pro’s low-light performance or dynamic range. The absence of information on OIS is a key missing piece; its presence on the K70 Pro would further solidify its camera advantage.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) represents a substantial upgrade over the OnePlus Ace 6T’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 5. The Gen 3’s Cortex-X4 prime core, clocked at 3.3 GHz, and revised Cortex-A720 performance cores deliver significantly improved CPU and GPU performance. The 4nm process node also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling during sustained workloads. While both are octa-core CPUs, the architectural improvements in the Gen 3 translate to a noticeable real-world performance advantage, particularly in graphically intensive games and demanding applications.
Battery Life
The Redmi K70 Pro’s 120W wired charging is a clear advantage over the Ace 6T’s 100W charging. Xiaomi claims a full charge in just 18 minutes, significantly faster than the Ace 6T’s estimated charge time. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging speed of the K70 Pro mitigates any potential disadvantage from a slightly smaller battery. The inclusion of PD3.0 and QC3+ support on the K70 Pro also offers broader compatibility with various chargers.
Buying Guide
Buy the OnePlus Ace 6T if you prioritize a more affordable price point and still require strong performance for everyday tasks and moderate gaming. It’s ideal for users who don’t necessarily need the absolute latest chipset. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro if you demand the best possible Android performance, particularly for demanding games and applications, and value the fastest possible charging speeds. This is the phone for power users and mobile gamers.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 in the Redmi K70 Pro handle Genshin Impact at max settings without significant throttling?
The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s improved thermal efficiency, thanks to the 4nm process, significantly reduces the risk of throttling compared to the 8 Gen 5. While sustained gaming will still generate heat, the K70 Pro is expected to maintain higher frame rates for longer periods at maximum settings in Genshin Impact.
❓ Does the 100W charging on the OnePlus Ace 6T support bypass charging, allowing me to charge while gaming?
Yes, the OnePlus Ace 6T explicitly supports bypass charging. This feature allows the phone to draw power directly from the charger while gaming, minimizing battery drain and preventing overheating. This is a valuable feature for extended gaming sessions.
❓ Is the difference in performance between the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 and 8 Gen 5 noticeable in everyday tasks like browsing and social media?
While both chips are powerful enough for everyday tasks, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 offers a smoother and more responsive experience, particularly when multitasking or switching between demanding apps. The difference won't be dramatic, but it will be perceptible to discerning users.
❓ What type of storage does the Redmi K70 Pro use, and does it impact performance?
The Redmi K70 Pro is expected to utilize UFS 4.0 storage, which is significantly faster than the UFS 3.1 commonly found in devices with the Snapdragon 8 Gen 5. This faster storage translates to quicker app loading times, faster file transfers, and an overall snappier user experience.
