The OnePlus Ace 6T and vivo iQOO 12 Pro represent distinct approaches to the high-performance Android smartphone market. The Ace 6T, likely positioned as a value-focused option, leverages the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 platform. The iQOO 12 Pro, on the other hand, arrives with the latest Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, promising a significant leap in processing power and efficiency. This comparison dissects the key differences to determine which device delivers the best experience for your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and future-proofing, the vivo iQOO 12 Pro is the clear winner thanks to its Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset and faster charging capabilities. However, the OnePlus Ace 6T remains a strong contender for budget-conscious users who still demand flagship-level performance.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 66, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | Expected announcement 2025, November | 2023, November 07 |
| Status | Rumored. Exp. release 2025, December | Available. Released 2023, November 14 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Crystal Shield Glass), aluminum alloy frame, glass back or fiber-reinforced plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | - | 164.6 x 75.4 x 8.6 mm or 8.8 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 205 g or 210 g (7.23 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Crystal Shield Glass | - |
| Resolution | 1272 x 2800 pixels (~450 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~518 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.83 inches, 113.3 cm2 | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~89.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 165Hz, PWM, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HDR Vivid | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1600 nits (HBM), 3000 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core | Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno | Adreno 750 |
| OS | Android 16, ColorOS 16 | Android 14, up to 2 major Android upgrades, Funtouch 14 (International), OriginOS 4 (China) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | Up to 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | - |
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.3", 1.2µm, ulti-directional PDAF, OIS
64 MP, f/2.6, 70mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom
50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 8K@30fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, LHDC 5 | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 100W wired
Bypass charging | 120W wired
50W wireless
10W reverse wireless |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 8300 mAh | 5100 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Purple, Green | Black, Red, White (BMW M branding) |
| Models | - | V2329A |
| Price | - | About 650 EUR |
OnePlus Ace 6T
- Potentially more affordable price point
- Fast 100W wired charging
- Excellent performance with Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
- Older Snapdragon chipset
- Lacks wireless charging
vivo iQOO 12 Pro
- Latest Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset
- Ultra-fast 120W wired charging
- 50W wireless charging and 10W reverse wireless charging
- Higher price tag
- Potential for increased thermal throttling under extreme load (though mitigated by 4nm process)
Display Comparison
While specific display details are missing, both phones are expected to feature high refresh rate AMOLED panels. The iQOO 12 Pro, being a flagship, likely boasts a higher peak brightness and potentially LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates, improving battery life. The Ace 6T, while still excellent, may compromise slightly on these features to maintain a competitive price. Expect the iQOO 12 Pro to offer a more visually vibrant and efficient display experience.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, it's difficult to make a definitive comparison. However, given the iQOO 12 Pro’s flagship positioning, it likely features a more advanced camera system with a larger main sensor and more sophisticated image processing algorithms. The iQOO 12 Pro is expected to excel in low-light photography and offer greater dynamic range. The Ace 6T will likely provide a capable camera experience, but may not match the iQOO 12 Pro’s overall image quality and versatility.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The iQOO 12 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) represents a substantial upgrade over the Ace 6T’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2. The Gen 3’s new Cortex-X4 prime core, clocked at 3.3 GHz, delivers significantly improved single-core performance. The iQOO 12 Pro’s CPU configuration (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4, 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720, 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720, 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) is optimized for both peak performance and sustained efficiency. The 4nm process node further enhances thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during extended gaming sessions. While the Ace 6T’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 is still a powerhouse, the iQOO 12 Pro offers a demonstrable performance advantage.
Battery Life
The iQOO 12 Pro’s 120W wired charging is significantly faster than the Ace 6T’s 100W charging, allowing for a quicker 0-100% charge. The addition of 50W wireless charging and 10W reverse wireless charging on the iQOO 12 Pro provides added convenience. While the Ace 6T’s 100W charging is still very fast, the iQOO 12 Pro offers a more complete charging solution. Battery capacity is not specified, but the faster charging speeds of the iQOO 12 Pro mitigate the impact of a potentially smaller battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the OnePlus Ace 6T if you need a powerful smartphone with fast 100W charging at a more accessible price point, and aren't necessarily chasing the absolute latest chipset. Buy the vivo iQOO 12 Pro if you prioritize top-tier performance, benefit from the added convenience of wireless charging, and are willing to invest in the newest Snapdragon technology for sustained performance and longevity.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 in the iQOO 12 Pro get noticeably hotter than the 8 Gen 2 in the Ace 6T during prolonged gaming?
While the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 is more powerful, it also generates more heat. However, the iQOO 12 Pro benefits from a more efficient 4nm manufacturing process and likely a more sophisticated cooling system, which should mitigate thermal throttling and maintain consistent performance for longer gaming sessions compared to the Ace 6T.
❓ Does the 120W charging on the iQOO 12 Pro significantly reduce battery lifespan compared to the 100W charging on the Ace 6T?
Modern smartphones have sophisticated battery management systems that minimize the impact of fast charging on long-term battery health. While faster charging generates more heat, the iQOO 12 Pro’s charging circuitry is designed to optimize the charging process and prevent overcharging, minimizing any potential degradation of the battery over time. The difference in lifespan is likely to be negligible for most users.
❓ Is the lack of wireless charging on the OnePlus Ace 6T a dealbreaker for users accustomed to this feature?
For users who frequently utilize wireless charging, the absence of this feature on the Ace 6T is a significant drawback. The iQOO 12 Pro’s 50W wireless charging offers a convenient alternative to wired charging, especially for topping up the battery overnight or in situations where a cable isn’t readily available.
