OnePlus Ace 6 vs Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro: A Deep Dive into Snapdragon Power and Charging Speed
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw gaming performance and sustained speeds, the Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro edges out the OnePlus Ace 6. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s superior thermal management and established architecture provide a more consistent experience, despite the Ace 6’s impressive peak CPU speeds. However, the Ace 6’s UFCS charging is a compelling advantage.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | OnePlus Ace 6 | Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 18, 26, 28A, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, October 27 | 2023, November 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, October 30 | Available. Released 2023, November 29 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Crystal Shield Glass), glass back, aluminum alloy frame | - |
| Dimensions | 163.4 x 77 x 8.3 mm (6.43 x 3.03 x 0.33 in) | 160.9 x 75 x 8.2 mm (6.33 x 2.95 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 213 g (7.51 oz) | 209 g (7.37 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Crystal Shield Glass | - |
| Resolution | 1272 x 2800 pixels (~450 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.83 inches, 113.3 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 165Hz, PWM, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HDR Vivid, 800 nits (typ), 1800 nits (HBM) | OLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 4000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x4.32 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix L + 6x3.53 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix M) | Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm) | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 830 | Adreno 750 |
| OS | Android 16, ColorOS 16 | Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 24GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | - |
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, (telephoto), PDAF, 2x optical zoom 12 MP, (ultrawide) |
| Video | 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 8K@24fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 720p@1920fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 23mm (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm | 16 MP, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, LHDC 5 | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 120W UFCS, 55W PPS, 18W PD, 18W QC, 58% in 20 min, 100% in 43 min Bypass charging | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 100% in 18 min |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 7800 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Silver | Black, Silver, Blue/Green, Lamborgini Green, Lamborgini Yellow |
| Models | PLQ110 | 23117RK66C |
| Price | About 310 EUR | About 430 EUR |
OnePlus Ace 6
- Potentially higher peak CPU performance with Oryon cores
- Wider charging protocol support (UFCS, PPS, PD, QC)
- Fastest charging time (43 minutes to 100%)
- Potential for thermal throttling under sustained load
- Less established CPU architecture (Oryon)
Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro
- More efficient and thermally stable Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
- Mature software optimization for Snapdragon
- Faster full charge time (18 minutes)
- May not reach the same peak CPU speeds as the Ace 6
- Less versatile charging protocol support
Display Comparison
While both phones likely feature high-refresh-rate AMOLED displays (data not provided), the core battle lies within the silicon. The display quality will likely be similar, but the chipset will dictate how smoothly animations and games render. Without specific display specs, it's difficult to differentiate beyond assuming both offer excellent viewing experiences.
Camera Comparison
Without camera specifications, a direct comparison is impossible. However, given the price points, both phones likely feature capable main sensors. The Redmi K70 Pro, benefiting from Xiaomi’s image processing expertise, may offer a more polished and consistent camera experience. The Ace 6’s camera performance will depend heavily on the sensor and software tuning.
Performance
The OnePlus Ace 6’s Snapdragon 8 Elite, built on a 3nm process, features a unique CPU configuration with 2x 4.32 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix L cores and 6x 3.53 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix M cores. This contrasts sharply with the Redmi K70 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, utilizing a 1x 3.3 GHz Cortex-X4, 3x 3.2 GHz Cortex-A720, 2x 3.0 GHz Cortex-A720, and 2x 2.3 GHz Cortex-A520 configuration. The Oryon cores in the Ace 6 promise exceptional single-core performance, but the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s architecture is more refined and benefits from Qualcomm’s extensive optimization. The 4nm process of the Gen 3, while less advanced than the 3nm of the 8 Elite, offers a strong balance of performance and efficiency, potentially leading to less thermal throttling under sustained load. The Redmi K70 Pro also benefits from the established ecosystem and optimizations surrounding the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3.
Battery Life
Both devices feature 120W wired charging, but the Ace 6 adds UFCS, PPS, PD, and QC support, offering greater compatibility and potentially faster charging with compatible adapters. The Ace 6 reaches 58% in 20 minutes and 100% in 43 minutes, while the K70 Pro achieves 100% in 18 minutes. This suggests the K70 Pro’s charging implementation is more efficient, despite both utilizing 120W. The actual real-world battery life will depend on the battery capacity (not provided) and the efficiency of the respective chipsets.
Buying Guide
Buy the OnePlus Ace 6 if you need the absolute fastest charging speeds available and are willing to potentially manage some thermal throttling during extended, demanding tasks. It’s ideal for users who prioritize quick top-ups and short bursts of peak performance. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro if you prefer a more balanced experience with consistently high performance, better thermal control for prolonged gaming sessions, and a more mature software experience.