OnePlus Ace 5 vs Xiaomi 13T: A Deep Dive into Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing peak performance and future-proofing, the OnePlus Ace 5 is the clear winner thanks to its Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset. However, the Xiaomi 13T offers excellent battery life and a bright display, making it a strong contender for those valuing longevity and media consumption.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | OnePlus Ace 5 | Xiaomi 13T |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, December 26 | 2023, September 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, December 26 | Available. Released 2023, September 26 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Crystal Shield Glass), glass back (Crystal Shield Glass), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back or silicone polymer back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 161.7 x 75.8 x 8.1 mm (6.37 x 2.98 x 0.32 in) | 162.2 x 75.7 x 8.5 mm (6.39 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 206 g or 223 g (7.27 oz) | 193 g or 197 g (6.81 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Crystal Shield Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1264 x 2780 pixels (~450 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.7 cm2 (~91.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 800 nits (typ), 1600 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 144Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1200 nits (HBM), 2600 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 Ultra (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 750 | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| OS | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Leica lens, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/1.9, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.88", 0.61µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 15mm (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30fps (HDR10+), 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, HDR10+ |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 18W PD, 55% in 15 min, 100% in 35 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 6415 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Gray, White, Green | Alpine Blue, Meadow Green, Black |
| Models | PKG110 | 2306EPN60G |
| Price | About 300 EUR | $ 255.96 / £ 326.27 / € 204.18 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
OnePlus Ace 5
- Significantly faster processor (Snapdragon 8 Gen 3)
- Faster charging speed (80W)
- Potential for higher gaming frame rates
- Potentially shorter battery life
- Cooling system performance is unknown
Xiaomi 13T
- Excellent battery life (12:23h active use)
- Bright display (1264 nits)
- Balanced overall experience
- Less powerful processor (Dimensity 8200 Ultra)
- Slower charging speed (67W)
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi 13T boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1264 nits. While the Ace 5’s display specs are currently unavailable, Xiaomi’s peak brightness is ideal for outdoor visibility. The 13T’s panel technology is likely AMOLED, common in this price range, but without knowing the Ace 5’s panel type (LTPO or standard AMOLED) or refresh rate, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the 13T’s brightness advantage is a clear win for users who frequently use their phones in sunlight.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specs for both devices are limited. However, given the market positioning, we can infer that the Xiaomi 13T likely prioritizes a versatile camera system with a focus on image processing. The Ace 5, geared towards performance, may have a more streamlined camera setup. Without knowing sensor sizes, aperture values, or OIS implementation, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. We can assume both phones will offer capable main cameras, but the Xiaomi 13T’s image processing algorithms are likely more refined for everyday photography.
Performance
The OnePlus Ace 5’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) represents a substantial leap in performance over the Xiaomi 13T’s Dimensity 8200 Ultra (4nm). The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s Cortex-X4 prime core, clocked at 3.3 GHz, offers significantly higher single-core performance than the 13T’s Cortex-A78 core at 3.1 GHz. The Snapdragon’s architecture, with its three Cortex-A720 cores at 3.2 GHz, also provides a performance edge in multi-threaded tasks. While both chips are built on a 4nm process, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s newer architecture and higher clock speeds translate to superior gaming performance and faster application loading times. The Ace 5’s potential for sustained performance will depend on its cooling solution, but the chipset itself is a clear advantage.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi 13T shines in battery endurance, achieving an active use score of 12:23h and an endurance rating of 101h. This suggests excellent power efficiency. The OnePlus Ace 5, while featuring 80W wired charging (significantly faster than the 13T’s 67W), may sacrifice some battery life for its higher performance. The Ace 5 can reach 55% charge in 15 minutes and 100% in 35 minutes, while the 13T takes 42 minutes for a full charge. The 13T’s longer battery life is a significant advantage for users who prioritize all-day usage, while the Ace 5’s faster charging mitigates downtime.
Buying Guide
Buy the OnePlus Ace 5 if you demand the absolute fastest performance for gaming and demanding applications, and are willing to trade some battery life for it. Buy the Xiaomi 13T if you prioritize all-day battery life, a vibrant display for media, and a more balanced overall experience without sacrificing significant performance.