OnePlus Ace 5 vs vivo S17 Pro: A Deep Dive into Performance and Charging
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and sustained gaming, the OnePlus Ace 5 is the clear winner. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 offers a substantial leap in CPU and GPU capabilities over the Dimensity 8200. However, the vivo S17 Pro provides a strong alternative for those seeking a balanced experience with efficient power management and a potentially more refined software experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | OnePlus Ace 5 | vivo S17 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, December 26 | 2023, May 31 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, December 26 | Available. Released 2023, June 08 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Crystal Shield Glass), glass back (Crystal Shield Glass), aluminum frame | - |
| Dimensions | 161.7 x 75.8 x 8.1 mm (6.37 x 2.98 x 0.32 in) | 164.2 x 74.4 x 7.5 mm (6.46 x 2.93 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 206 g or 223 g (7.27 oz) | 188 g (6.63 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Crystal Shield Glass | - |
| Resolution | 1264 x 2780 pixels (~450 ppi density) | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~452 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.7 cm2 (~91.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.5 cm2 (~91.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 800 nits (typ), 1600 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 750 | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| OS | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 13, OriginOS 3 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.0, (telephoto), PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) |
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm | 50 MP, f/2.0, 22mm (wide), AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 18W PD, 55% in 15 min, 100% in 35 min | 80W wired, 70% in 30 min |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 6415 mAh | 4600 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Gray, White, Green | Black, Blue, Silver |
| Models | PKG110 | V2284A |
| Price | About 300 EUR | About 410 EUR |
OnePlus Ace 5
- Superior processing power with Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
- Potentially faster initial charging speed (80W)
- Versatile charging options with 18W PD
- May run hotter under sustained load
- Software experience may be less refined than vivo
vivo S17 Pro
- Efficient power management with Dimensity 8200
- Potentially better camera image processing (vivo's strength)
- User-friendly software experience
- Lower peak performance compared to Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
- Slightly slower charging speed compared to Ace 5
Display Comparison
While both devices likely feature high-refresh-rate AMOLED displays (specs not provided), the core difference lies in the processing power driving them. The Ace 5’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 will ensure consistently high frame rates in graphically intensive games, while the Dimensity 8200 in the S17 Pro may exhibit some frame drops under sustained load. Without specific display specs, it's difficult to assess color accuracy or peak brightness, but both brands typically deliver vibrant and sharp visuals.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is challenging. However, the chipset plays a role in image processing speed and quality. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s advanced ISP (Image Signal Processor) will likely enable faster image capture and more sophisticated computational photography features on the Ace 5. The Dimensity 8200’s ISP is capable, but may not match the Snapdragon’s processing power. We anticipate the S17 Pro may focus on a more 'natural' image processing style, typical of vivo, while the Ace 5 might lean towards more vibrant, contrast-enhanced images.
Performance
The OnePlus Ace 5’s Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 is a significant upgrade over the vivo S17 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 8200. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s octa-core configuration, featuring the Cortex-X4 prime core clocked at 3.3 GHz, provides a substantial performance advantage in both single-core and multi-core tasks. The Dimensity 8200, while still capable, utilizes older Cortex-A78 cores and a less efficient core arrangement. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and superior gaming performance on the Ace 5. The 4nm fabrication process of both chips contributes to improved thermal efficiency, but the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s architectural improvements likely give it an edge in sustained performance.
Battery Life
Both phones feature 80W wired charging, but the charging speeds differ slightly. The Ace 5 claims 55% charge in 15 minutes and 100% in 35 minutes, while the S17 Pro reaches 70% in 30 minutes. This suggests the Ace 5 may have a slightly faster initial charging curve. While battery capacity isn't specified, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s improved efficiency could offset a potentially smaller battery size in the Ace 5, resulting in comparable real-world battery life. The inclusion of 18W PD charging on the Ace 5 offers greater versatility for slower charging scenarios.
Buying Guide
Buy the OnePlus Ace 5 if you need uncompromising performance for demanding games, content creation, or heavy multitasking. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset and potentially more aggressive cooling solution will deliver a smoother, more responsive experience. Buy the vivo S17 Pro if you prefer a more balanced device with a focus on efficient power usage, potentially better camera image processing, and a user interface that prioritizes ease of use over raw speed.