OnePlus Ace 5 Ultra vs Xiaomi 14T Pro: A Deep Dive into Dimensity Power and Charging Speed
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing absolute charging speed and wireless charging convenience, the Xiaomi 14T Pro is the clear winner, reaching 100% in just 19 minutes. However, the OnePlus Ace 5 Ultra’s newer Dimensity 9400+ chipset offers a potential performance edge, making it ideal for demanding gamers and power users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | OnePlus Ace 5 Ultra | Xiaomi 14T Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, May 27 | 2024, September 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, May 27 | Available. Released 2024, September 26 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame, glass back (Panda X) |
| Dimensions | 163.4 x 77 x 8.1 mm (6.43 x 3.03 x 0.32 in) | 160.4 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.31 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· eSIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 206 g (7.27 oz) | 209 g (7.37 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Crystal Shield Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1272 x 2800 pixels (~450 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.83 inches, 113.3 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, 3840Hz PWM, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HDR Vivid, 800 nits (typ), 1400 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 144Hz, 3840Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1600 nits (HBM), 4000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.73 GHz Cortex-X925 & 3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720) | Octa-core (1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (3 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G925 MC12 | Immortalis-G720 MC12 |
| OS | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Leica lens, Ultra HDR, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 60mm (telephoto), 1/2.88", 0.61µm, PDAF, 2.6x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 15mm (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 8K@24/30fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, gyro-EIS, 10-bit Rec. 2020, HDR10+ |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 23mm (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/3.44", 0.64µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, HDR10+ |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5, BLE Audio | 5.4, A2DP, LE, LHDC |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1C+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), GLONASS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 100W wired, PD, 100% in 39 min 7.5W reverse wired Bypass charging | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 19 min 50W wireless, 100% in 45 min |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 6700 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Blue, Black, Titanium | Titan Gray, Titan Blue, Titan Black |
| Models | PLC110 | 2407FPN8EG |
| Price | About 310 EUR | $ 550.00 / £ 498.00 / € 539.99 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
OnePlus Ace 5 Ultra
- Potentially superior CPU performance with the Dimensity 9400+ and Cortex-X925 core.
- More efficient 3nm manufacturing process could lead to better thermal management.
- 100W wired charging is still very fast.
- Slower charging speed compared to the Xiaomi 14T Pro.
- Battery life data currently unavailable.
- Display brightness data missing.
Xiaomi 14T Pro
- Blazing-fast 120W wired charging (19 minutes to full).
- 50W wireless charging adds convenience.
- Excellent 12:32h active use battery life.
- Older 4nm Dimensity 9300+ chipset may not match the 9400+'s peak performance.
- CPU architecture relies on three Cortex-X4 cores instead of the X925.
- Limited camera details available.
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi 14T Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 1228 nits, suggesting a more visible display in direct sunlight compared to the Ace 5 Ultra (brightness data unavailable). While both likely utilize high refresh rate AMOLED panels, the 14T Pro’s higher peak brightness is a tangible advantage for outdoor visibility. Details regarding panel technology (LTPO vs standard AMOLED) and color accuracy are currently unavailable, but the Xiaomi’s brightness figure is a clear differentiator.
Camera Comparison
Camera specifications are currently limited. Without sensor size, aperture, or OIS details, a direct comparison is difficult. However, focusing on the chipset’s ISP capabilities, both phones should offer excellent image processing. The absence of information regarding the main sensor resolution and features makes it impossible to determine a clear winner. We can assume both will offer a range of shooting modes, but image quality will depend heavily on the hardware not currently provided.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the OnePlus Ace 5 Ultra features the Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (3nm), while the Xiaomi 14T Pro uses the Dimensity 9300+ (4nm). The 9400+'s 3nm process *should* translate to improved power efficiency and thermal performance, allowing for sustained peak performance. The CPU architecture also differs; the Ace 5 Ultra utilizes a Cortex-X925 prime core clocked at 3.73 GHz, potentially offering a slight edge over the 14T Pro’s 3.4 GHz Cortex-X4. However, the 14T Pro has three Cortex-X4 cores versus the Ace 5 Ultra's one, which could balance out performance in multi-threaded tasks. Both phones utilize LPDDR5x RAM, but the specific speed isn't specified, making it difficult to assess a memory bandwidth advantage.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi 14T Pro shines in charging speed, achieving a full charge in just 19 minutes with its 120W wired charging, and 45 minutes with 50W wireless. The OnePlus Ace 5 Ultra, while still fast at 39 minutes for a full 100W wired charge, falls behind. The 14T Pro also boasts an impressive 12:32h active use score, indicating strong battery optimization. The Ace 5 Ultra’s battery capacity is unknown, but the 14T Pro’s combination of fast charging and long battery life is a significant advantage for users who prioritize convenience.
Buying Guide
Buy the OnePlus Ace 5 Ultra if you need the latest processor architecture for sustained gaming performance and don't mind slightly slower charging. Its Dimensity 9400+ and optimized cooling should deliver a smoother experience under heavy load. Buy the Xiaomi 14T Pro if you prioritize rapid charging – both wired and wireless – and value a longer active use battery life, making it perfect for users constantly on the go.