The OnePlus Ace 5 Racing and Xiaomi Redmi K60 Pro represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive flagship smartphone market. While both aim for high performance, they diverge in chipset choice – Mediatek’s Dimensity 9400e versus Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 – and charging capabilities, creating a clear battle between raw speed and optimized efficiency. This comparison will dissect these differences to help you choose the right device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and faster charging, the Xiaomi Redmi K60 Pro emerges as the winner. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s proven track record and 120W charging offer a more refined experience, despite the Ace 5 Racing’s competitive price point. However, the Ace 5 Racing is a strong contender for budget-conscious gamers.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| | - | CDMA2000 1x |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, May 27 | 2022, December 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, May 27 | Available. Released 2023, January 01 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 163.6 x 76 x 8.2 mm (6.44 x 2.99 x 0.32 in) | 162.8 x 75.4 x 8.6 mm or 8.9 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 200 g (7.05 oz) | 201 g or 205 g (7.09 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Crystal Shield Glass | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2392 pixels (~387 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.77 inches, 111.5 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR Vivid, 800 nits (typ), 1300 nits (HBM) | OLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1400 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9400e (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G720 MC12 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 13, MIUI 14 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 4.0
UFS 3.1 - 128GB only |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 54 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.49", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 720p@1920fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 23mm (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm | 16 MP, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30/60/120fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a+Bc), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 33W PPS, 18W PD/QC
Bypass charging | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 100% in 19 min
30W wireless |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 7100 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Green | Black, White, Mint, Champion Black |
| Models | PLF110 | 22127RK46C |
| Price | About 220 EUR | About 460 EUR |
OnePlus Ace 5 Racing
- Potentially higher peak CPU performance due to Cortex-X4 cores
- 80W fast charging with bypass charging for gaming
- Competitive price point offering excellent value
- Dimensity 9400e GPU likely less powerful than Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
- No wireless charging support
- Potential for more thermal throttling under sustained load
Xiaomi Redmi K60 Pro
- Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 offers superior GPU performance and thermal management
- Industry-leading 120W wired charging and 30W wireless charging
- Likely more refined camera system with OIS
- Generally more expensive than the OnePlus Ace 5 Racing
- CPU performance may be slightly lower in certain benchmarks
- Software experience may vary based on MIUI version
Display Comparison
While display specifications aren't provided, both phones likely feature high refresh rate AMOLED panels, standard for this segment. The Redmi K60 Pro, given Xiaomi’s history, may incorporate a slightly higher peak brightness and potentially LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates, improving power efficiency. The Ace 5 Racing, focusing on gaming, might prioritize a lower response time for smoother visuals. Bezels are expected to be minimal on both, but the K60 Pro’s build quality may be slightly more premium.
Camera Comparison
Without specific camera specs, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, Xiaomi typically equips its ‘Pro’ models with larger sensors and more advanced image processing. The Redmi K60 Pro likely features a more capable main sensor with Optical Image Stabilization (OIS), resulting in better low-light performance and sharper images. The Ace 5 Racing may focus on a more vibrant, saturated color profile, appealing to a different aesthetic. The inclusion of a telephoto lens on the K60 Pro would further differentiate its camera capabilities.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Redmi K60 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm) utilizes a 1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 prime core, known for its efficiency and performance. The OnePlus Ace 5 Racing’s Dimensity 9400e (4nm) features a more aggressive core configuration with 1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4 and 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4, suggesting a focus on raw CPU power. However, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s Adreno 740 GPU is generally considered superior to the Mali-G715 MC11 in the Dimensity 9400e, offering better sustained gaming performance. Both utilize LPDDR5x RAM, but thermal management will be crucial; the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 typically exhibits better thermal efficiency, reducing throttling during extended gaming sessions.
Battery Life
The Redmi K60 Pro’s 120W wired charging is a significant advantage, promising a full charge in approximately 19 minutes. The Ace 5 Racing’s 80W charging is still fast, but noticeably slower. The K60 Pro also adds 30W wireless charging, a feature absent on the Ace 5 Racing. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging of the K60 Pro effectively mitigates any potential disadvantage from a slightly smaller battery size. The inclusion of bypass charging on the Ace 5 Racing is a plus, allowing for cooler charging during gaming.
Buying Guide
Buy the OnePlus Ace 5 Racing if you need a powerful gaming phone on a tighter budget and value a balanced approach to performance and battery life. Its 80W charging is still very fast, and the Dimensity 9400e offers excellent peak performance. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi K60 Pro if you prioritize consistently high frame rates in demanding games, require the fastest possible charging speeds (120W), and appreciate the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s established thermal management.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Dimensity 9400e in the OnePlus Ace 5 Racing overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 9400e is a powerful chip, but its thermal performance is a concern. While the 4nm process helps, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 in the Redmi K60 Pro is generally more efficient and less prone to throttling under sustained load. Expect some performance degradation after extended gaming on the Ace 5 Racing.
❓ How much faster is the 120W charging on the Xiaomi Redmi K60 Pro compared to the 80W charging on the OnePlus Ace 5 Racing in real-world use?
The Redmi K60 Pro can charge from 0-100% in around 19 minutes, while the Ace 5 Racing will take approximately 30-40 minutes. This difference is particularly noticeable for quick top-ups, allowing you to gain a significant amount of battery life in a short period.
❓ Does the Xiaomi Redmi K60 Pro support high refresh rate gaming, and will it maintain stable frame rates?
The Redmi K60 Pro, powered by the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 and Adreno 740 GPU, is well-equipped for high refresh rate gaming. It should consistently deliver stable frame rates in most popular titles at high settings, benefiting from the chip's superior thermal management.
❓ Is the bypass charging feature on the OnePlus Ace 5 Racing useful for gamers?
Yes, bypass charging is beneficial for gamers. It allows the phone to be powered directly from the charger while gaming, bypassing the battery and reducing heat buildup. This can help maintain performance and prolong battery health during long gaming sessions.
