OnePlus Ace 5 Racing vs Xiaomi 13T: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing peak performance and faster charging, the OnePlus Ace 5 Racing is the better choice, thanks to its Dimensity 9400e chipset and 80W charging. However, the Xiaomi 13T delivers superior battery life and a brighter display, making it ideal for everyday users and media consumers.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | OnePlus Ace 5 Racing | Xiaomi 13T |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, May 27 | 2023, September 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, May 27 | Available. Released 2023, September 26 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back or silicone polymer back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.6 x 76 x 8.2 mm (6.44 x 2.99 x 0.32 in) | 162.2 x 75.7 x 8.5 mm (6.39 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 200 g (7.05 oz) | 193 g or 197 g (6.81 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Crystal Shield Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2392 pixels (~387 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.77 inches, 111.5 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR Vivid, 800 nits (typ), 1300 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 144Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1200 nits (HBM), 2600 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9400e (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 Ultra (4 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G720 MC12 | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| OS | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Leica lens, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/1.9, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.88", 0.61µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 15mm (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30fps (HDR10+), 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 23mm (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, HDR10+ |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 33W PPS, 18W PD/QC Bypass charging | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 7100 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Green | Alpine Blue, Meadow Green, Black |
| Models | PLF110 | 2306EPN60G |
| Price | About 220 EUR | $ 255.96 / £ 326.27 / € 204.18 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
OnePlus Ace 5 Racing
- Faster CPU performance with Dimensity 9400e
- 80W SuperVOOC charging for rapid refills
- Potential for higher gaming frame rates
- Battery life likely shorter than Xiaomi 13T
- Display brightness potentially lower than Xiaomi 13T
- Camera details currently unknown
Xiaomi 13T
- Excellent battery life (12:23h active use)
- Brighter display (1264 nits peak)
- OIS for improved image and video stabilization
- Slightly slower CPU performance
- 67W charging is slower than Ace 5 Racing
- Dimensity 8200 Ultra may throttle under sustained load
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi 13T boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1264 nits, compared to an unspecified peak brightness for the Ace 5 Racing. This translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While panel technology details are missing for the Ace 5 Racing, the 13T’s brightness advantage is a clear win for outdoor usability. Both devices likely utilize AMOLED panels, common in this price bracket, but the 13T’s brightness is a quantifiable advantage.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specifications are limited, but the Xiaomi 13T’s inclusion of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on its main sensor is a significant advantage, promising sharper images and smoother video, especially in low-light conditions. The Ace 5 Racing’s camera setup is currently unknown, making it difficult to assess its image quality. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on the 13T is largely inconsequential, as image quality from such sensors is typically poor. The focus should be on the main sensor and its processing capabilities, where the 13T likely holds an edge due to its OIS.
Performance
The OnePlus Ace 5 Racing’s Mediatek Dimensity 9400e, with its Cortex-X4 prime core clocked at 3.4 GHz, represents a step up in CPU performance compared to the Xiaomi 13T’s Dimensity 8200 Ultra (3.1 GHz Cortex-A78). The Ace 5 Racing also features three additional Cortex-X4 cores, suggesting a stronger focus on sustained performance. However, the Dimensity 8200 Ultra’s GPU is likely more mature and optimized. The Ace 5 Racing’s LPDDR5x RAM configuration is standard for this class, but the thermal management capabilities will be crucial to prevent throttling under sustained load, a detail currently unknown. The 8200 Ultra’s efficiency could give the 13T an edge in long-term sustained performance.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi 13T demonstrates a clear advantage in battery endurance, achieving an active use score of 12:23h and an endurance rating of 101 hours. While the OnePlus Ace 5 Racing’s battery capacity is unknown, the 13T’s performance sets a high bar. The Ace 5 Racing compensates with significantly faster 80W wired charging, including 33W PPS and 18W PD/QC bypass charging, allowing for a full charge in less time than the 13T’s 67W charging (42 minutes to 100%). This trade-off favors the Ace 5 Racing for users who prioritize quick top-ups, while the 13T caters to those who want all-day battery life.
Buying Guide
Buy the OnePlus Ace 5 Racing if you need uncompromising CPU performance for demanding games and applications, and value the fastest possible charging speeds. Buy the Xiaomi 13T if you prioritize all-day battery life, a vibrant and bright display for media consumption, and a more balanced overall experience. The 13T is the safer bet for users who don't constantly push their phone to its limits.