OnePlus Ace 5 Racing vs. Xiaomi 13 Pro: A Deep Dive into Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a well-rounded experience, the Xiaomi 13 Pro emerges as the stronger contender. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 offers excellent performance and efficiency, complemented by a superior camera system and significantly faster charging speeds. However, gamers seeking maximum CPU performance on a budget will find the Ace 5 Racing compelling.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | OnePlus Ace 5 Racing | Xiaomi 13 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, May 27 | 2022, December 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, May 27 | Available. Released 2022, December 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), ceramic back or silicone polymer back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.6 x 76 x 8.2 mm (6.44 x 2.99 x 0.32 in) | 162.9 x 74.6 x 8.4 mm or 8.7 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 200 g (7.05 oz) | 210 g or 229 g (7.41 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Crystal Shield Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2392 pixels (~387 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~522 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.77 inches, 111.5 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.73 inches, 108.9 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR Vivid, 800 nits (typ), 1300 nits (HBM) | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1200 nits (HBM), 1900 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9400e (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G720 MC12 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 - 128GB UFS 4.0 - 256/512GB | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Leica lens, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50.3 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 75mm (telephoto), PDAF (10cm - ∞), 3.2x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 115˚ (ultrawide), AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 8K@24fps (HDR), 4K@24/30/60fps (HDR10+, 10-bit Dolby Vision HDR, 10-bit LOG), 1080p@30/120/240/960fps, 1080p@1920fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 23mm (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.0, 22mm (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 | 5.3, A2DP, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 33W PPS, 18W PD/QC Bypass charging | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 19 min 50W wireless, 100% in 36 min 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 7100 mAh | Li-Po 4820 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Green | Ceramic White, Ceramic Black, Ceramic Flora Green, Mountain Blue |
| Models | PLF110 | 2210132G, 2210132C |
| Price | About 220 EUR | About 750 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 115h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.6 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 1281666 (v9) GeekBench: 5087 (v5.1), 5323 (v6) GFXBench: 64fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
OnePlus Ace 5 Racing
- Potentially higher peak CPU performance due to Cortex-X4 cores.
- Competitive price point (likely lower than Xiaomi 13 Pro).
- 80W fast charging is still respectable.
- Limited camera details suggest a potentially weaker camera system.
- Unusual CPU configuration may lead to thermal throttling.
- Lacks wireless charging capabilities.
Xiaomi 13 Pro
- Superior camera system with advanced features.
- Faster 120W wired and 50W wireless charging.
- More efficient Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 processor.
- Higher price point.
- May not offer the absolute highest CPU performance in benchmarks.
- Software experience can be divisive (MIUI).
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi 13 Pro boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1253 nits, compared to an unspecified peak brightness for the Ace 5 Racing. While both likely utilize high-refresh-rate panels, the Xiaomi 13 Pro’s infinite contrast ratio suggests a superior OLED panel. The Ace 5 Racing’s display specifications are currently limited, making a direct comparison difficult, but the Xiaomi 13 Pro’s brightness advantage will be noticeable in direct sunlight.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are advertised as having strong camera capabilities (Photo/Video), but detailed specifications are lacking for the Ace 5 Racing. The Xiaomi 13 Pro is expected to feature a more sophisticated camera system, likely with larger sensors and advanced image processing algorithms. Without specific sensor details for the Ace 5 Racing, it’s difficult to assess its capabilities, but Xiaomi’s history suggests a focus on image quality and versatility. The absence of details regarding OIS or lens apertures on the Ace 5 Racing further highlights the Xiaomi 13 Pro’s likely advantage.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi 13 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm) utilizes a 1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 prime core, while the OnePlus Ace 5 Racing features the Mediatek Dimensity 9400e (4nm) with a 1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4. While the Ace 5 Racing’s X4 core has a slightly higher clock speed, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s architecture and optimization generally translate to better sustained performance and thermal management. The Ace 5 Racing’s CPU configuration, with three Cortex-X4 cores, is unusual and may lead to higher power consumption. Both phones utilize 4nm fabrication, but Qualcomm’s experience with the 8 Gen 2 provides an edge in efficiency.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi 13 Pro’s 120W wired charging is a significant advantage, achieving a full charge in just 19 minutes. The OnePlus Ace 5 Racing’s 80W charging, while still fast, is considerably slower. The Xiaomi 13 Pro also offers 50W wireless charging and 10W reverse wireless charging, features absent on the Ace 5 Racing. Despite having the same endurance rating of 115h, the Xiaomi 13 Pro’s faster charging mitigates any potential battery anxiety, and its active use score of 10:55h suggests strong real-world performance.
Buying Guide
Buy the OnePlus Ace 5 Racing if you need uncompromising CPU performance for mobile gaming and are comfortable with potentially less refined software and camera experiences. Buy the Xiaomi 13 Pro if you prefer a polished, all-around flagship with a class-leading camera, faster charging, and a more premium feel, even if it means sacrificing a slight edge in raw CPU benchmarks.