OnePlus Ace 5 Racing vs. vivo iQOO 11S: A Head-to-Head Performance and Charging Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw speed and future-proofing, the vivo iQOO 11S is the clear winner. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 offers a performance edge, and the 200W charging is a game-changer. However, the OnePlus Ace 5 Racing provides excellent value for budget-conscious gamers.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | OnePlus Ace 5 Racing | vivo iQOO 11S |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, May 27 | 2023, July 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, May 27 | Available. Released 2023, July 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 163.6 x 76 x 8.2 mm (6.44 x 2.99 x 0.32 in) | 164.9 x 77.1 x 8.4 mm or 8.7 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 200 g (7.05 oz) | 207 g or 210 g (7.30 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Crystal Shield Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2392 pixels (~387 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~518 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.77 inches, 111.5 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~87.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR Vivid, 800 nits (typ), 1300 nits (HBM) | LTPO4 AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9400e (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G720 MC12 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 13, OriginOS 3 (China) |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/1.49", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.5, 47mm (telephoto), PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm (ultrawide) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 23mm (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 33W PPS, 18W PD/QC Bypass charging | 200W wired, PD3.0, UFCS |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 7100 mAh | 4700 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Green | Black, Sky Blue, Legendary White (BMW M branding) |
| Models | PLF110 | V2304A |
| Price | About 220 EUR | About 500 EUR |
OnePlus Ace 5 Racing
- Excellent value for money
- Capable gaming performance with Dimensity 9400e
- 80W fast charging with bypass charging
- Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 offers superior performance
- Slower charging compared to iQOO 11S
vivo iQOO 11S
- Top-tier performance with Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
- Blazing-fast 200W wired charging
- Advanced ISP for superior image processing
- Higher price point
- Potential for increased heat under sustained load
Display Comparison
While both devices likely feature high refresh rate AMOLED displays (data not provided), the core battle lies in performance. The iQOO 11S benefits from the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s integrated display engine, potentially offering smoother animations and more efficient power consumption. The Ace 5 Racing’s Dimensity 9400e will also deliver a fluid experience, but may not match the Snapdragon’s optimization. Without specific display specs, it's difficult to assess color accuracy or peak brightness, but iQOO phones generally prioritize vibrant, saturated colors.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is challenging. However, iQOO phones often prioritize camera performance, and the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is a significant asset. The iQOO 11S likely features a more sophisticated image processing pipeline, resulting in better dynamic range and low-light performance. The Ace 5 Racing will offer a respectable camera experience, but may not match the iQOO 11S in terms of overall image quality and features. We can assume both phones will have a primary camera, but sensor size and OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) are unknown factors.
Performance
The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 in the iQOO 11S is the performance champion. Its octa-core configuration, featuring a Cortex-X3 prime core clocked at 3.2 GHz, provides a noticeable advantage over the Dimensity 9400e’s Cortex-X4 setup. While the Ace 5 Racing utilizes three Cortex-X4 cores (at 2.85 GHz), the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s architecture is more refined and efficient. The 4nm process node is shared by both, but Qualcomm’s optimizations typically result in better sustained performance and thermal management. The iQOO 11S will likely exhibit less throttling during extended gaming sessions. The Ace 5 Racing, however, is no slouch and will handle demanding tasks with ease.
Battery Life
The iQOO 11S’s 200W wired charging is the standout feature. This technology can fully charge the battery in a matter of minutes, a significant advantage over the Ace 5 Racing’s 80W charging. While the Ace 5 Racing’s 80W charging is still fast, the iQOO 11S offers a level of convenience that is unmatched. The iQOO 11S also supports PD3.0 and UFCS, offering wider compatibility. The actual battery capacity (mAh) is not provided, but the iQOO 11S’s faster charging mitigates the impact of a potentially smaller battery. The Ace 5 Racing supports 33W PPS and 18W PD/QC, offering flexibility but lacking the sheer speed of the iQOO 11S.
Buying Guide
Buy the OnePlus Ace 5 Racing if you need a capable gaming phone without breaking the bank, and are comfortable with slightly slower charging speeds. It’s ideal for users who prioritize value and don’t necessarily need the absolute fastest processor. Buy the vivo iQOO 11S if you prefer uncompromising performance, incredibly fast charging, and are willing to pay a premium for the latest Qualcomm flagship chipset. This phone is geared towards power users and mobile gaming enthusiasts.