The OnePlus Ace 5 Racing and Realme GT3 represent distinct approaches to the performance smartphone. The Ace 5 Racing prioritizes a newer chipset and efficient charging, while the GT3 doubles down on extreme charging speeds with a proven, albeit older, flagship processor. This comparison dissects the trade-offs between these two devices, helping you determine which best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing future-proofing and balanced performance, the OnePlus Ace 5 Racing emerges as the better choice. Its Dimensity 9400e offers competitive performance with potentially better efficiency, and its 80W charging is still remarkably fast. However, the Realme GT3’s 240W charging is a game-changer for those who absolutely need the fastest possible top-ups.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 | LTE |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, May 27 | 2023, February 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, May 27 | Available. Released 2023, July 08 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 163.6 x 76 x 8.2 mm (6.44 x 2.99 x 0.32 in) | 163.9 x 75.8 x 8.9 mm (6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 200 g (7.05 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| | - | Illuminated RGB (on the back) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Crystal Shield Glass | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2392 pixels (~387 ppi density) | 1240 x 2772 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~451 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.77 inches, 111.5 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.74 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~87.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR Vivid, 800 nits (typ), 1300 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1100 nits (HBM), 1400 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9400e (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G720 MC12 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, Realme UI 5.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, 25mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP, f/3.3, 20mm (microscope) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 23mm (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, 25mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (dual side) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 33W PPS, 18W PD/QC
Bypass charging | 240W wired, PD, 50% in 4 min, 100% in 10 min |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 7100 mAh | 4600 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Green | Pulse White, Booster Black |
| Models | PLF110 | RMX3709 |
| Price | About 220 EUR | About 600 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 117h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.9 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 1074427 (v9)
GeekBench: 3898 (v5.1), 3980 (v6)
GFXBench: 59fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
OnePlus Ace 5 Racing
- Newer Dimensity 9400e chipset offers potential performance and efficiency gains.
- Balanced charging speed (80W) with bypass charging.
- Potentially better thermal management due to chipset architecture.
- Display specifications are currently unknown.
- Camera details are limited, making it difficult to assess image quality.
Realme GT3
- Industry-leading 240W charging for incredibly fast top-ups.
- High peak brightness (974 nits) for excellent outdoor visibility.
- Proven Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 performance.
- Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is prone to thermal throttling under sustained load.
- Ultra-fast charging may accelerate battery degradation over time.
Display Comparison
The Realme GT3 boasts a measured peak brightness of 974 nits, suggesting a vibrant and easily viewable display in outdoor conditions. While the Ace 5 Racing’s display specifications are not provided, Realme’s figure sets a high bar. Both devices likely utilize high refresh rate panels, common in this segment, but the GT3’s infinite contrast ratio (nominal) indicates a strong OLED implementation. Without further details on the Ace 5 Racing’s panel technology (LTPO, PWM dimming rate), the GT3 currently holds an advantage in display quality based on available data.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are lacking. Without sensor size, aperture, or OIS information, a direct comparison is difficult. The absence of details suggests neither phone is positioned as a camera-centric flagship. We can assume both will offer competent image capture in good lighting conditions, but low-light performance will likely be a differentiating factor dependent on sensor size and image processing algorithms. Ignoring the likely inclusion of low-resolution auxiliary lenses (e.g., 2MP macro), the main sensor performance will be the key differentiator.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Realme GT3’s Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm) is a proven performer, featuring an octa-core configuration with a Cortex-X2 prime core clocked at 3.0 GHz. However, the OnePlus Ace 5 Racing’s Mediatek Dimensity 9400e (4nm) utilizes newer Cortex-X4 cores, with a primary core clocked higher at 3.4 GHz, and three additional X4 cores at 2.85 GHz. This suggests a potential advantage in multi-core performance for the Ace 5 Racing. The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is known to generate more heat under sustained load, potentially leading to throttling, while the Dimensity 9400e’s 4nm process and core architecture may offer better thermal efficiency. Both devices likely feature LPDDR5x RAM, but the specific speed isn’t detailed.
Battery Life
Both devices share an endurance rating of 117 hours, indicating similar real-world battery life despite differing charging capabilities. However, the charging experience is drastically different. The Realme GT3’s 240W wired charging is its headline feature, capable of reaching 50% charge in just 4 minutes and 100% in 10 minutes. The OnePlus Ace 5 Racing offers a more moderate 80W wired charging, alongside 33W PPS and 18W PD/QC support, and bypass charging. While 80W is still fast, the GT3’s 240W offers unparalleled speed, albeit potentially at the cost of increased heat generation and battery degradation over the long term.
Buying Guide
Buy the OnePlus Ace 5 Racing if you need a phone with a modern chipset that balances performance and efficiency, and value a good charging speed without the extreme heat associated with ultra-fast charging. Buy the Realme GT3 if you prioritize the absolute fastest charging available, are willing to accept potentially more thermal throttling under sustained load, and appreciate a phone that can go from 0 to 100% in under 15 minutes.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Realme GT3’s 240W charging significantly degrade the battery faster than the OnePlus Ace 5 Racing’s 80W charging?
While 240W charging is incredibly fast, it does generate more heat, which can contribute to battery degradation over time. The OnePlus Ace 5 Racing’s 80W charging is gentler on the battery, potentially extending its lifespan. However, modern battery management systems mitigate this effect, and the difference may not be noticeable for several years of typical use.
❓ Does the Dimensity 9400e in the OnePlus Ace 5 Racing outperform the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 in the Realme GT3 in gaming?
The Dimensity 9400e’s newer core architecture (Cortex-X4) suggests a potential advantage in multi-core gaming performance. However, the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 has a mature software ecosystem and optimized drivers. Real-world gaming performance will depend on the specific game and optimization, but the Ace 5 Racing may offer better sustained performance due to potentially superior thermal management.
❓ Is the Realme GT3’s charging speed safe for the phone and the charger?
Realme has implemented safety measures to ensure the 240W charging is safe. The phone and charger are designed to handle the high power delivery, and multiple layers of protection prevent overheating and overcharging. However, it’s crucial to use the official Realme charger and cable to ensure compatibility and safety.
