The OnePlus Ace 5 Racing and Realme GT Neo 5 240W represent two distinct approaches to delivering a high-performance Android experience. The Ace 5 Racing prioritizes a newer chipset, the Mediatek Dimensity 9400e, while the GT Neo 5 240W leverages the established Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 alongside groundbreaking 240W charging. This comparison dissects these choices, revealing which phone best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing ultimate charging speed and a proven performer, the Realme GT Neo 5 240W is the winner. Its 240W charging is a game-changer, and the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 offers consistent, reliable performance. However, the OnePlus Ace 5 Racing presents a compelling alternative for those seeking the latest chipset architecture.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| | - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, May 27 | 2023, February 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, May 27 | Available. Released 2023, February 09 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 163.6 x 76 x 8.2 mm (6.44 x 2.99 x 0.32 in) | 163.9 x 75.8 x 8.9 mm (6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 200 g (7.05 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| | - | Illuminated RGB (on the back) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Crystal Shield Glass | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2392 pixels (~387 ppi density) | 1240 x 2772 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~451 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.77 inches, 111.5 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.74 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~87.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR Vivid, 800 nits (typ), 1300 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1400 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9400e (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G720 MC12 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, 25mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP, f/3.3, 20mm (microscope) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 23mm (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, 25mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (dual side) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 33W PPS, 18W PD/QC
Bypass charging | 240W wired, 50% in 4 min, 100% in 10 min |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 7100 mAh | 4600 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Green | Purple, Black, White |
| Models | PLF110 | RMX3708 |
| Price | About 220 EUR | About 440 EUR |
OnePlus Ace 5 Racing
- Latest Mediatek Dimensity 9400e chipset
- Unique CPU core configuration potentially favoring sustained performance
- Versatile charging options (33W PPS, 18W PD/QC)
- Slower 80W charging compared to the competition
- Chipset may require further software optimization
- Limited information on camera capabilities
Realme GT Neo 5 240W
- Blazing-fast 240W charging (100% in 10 minutes)
- Proven Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 performance
- Excellent thermal management expected from the Snapdragon platform
- Older chipset generation compared to the Dimensity 9400e
- May not offer the absolute latest in CPU architecture
- Image processing may be overly saturated for some users
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the market positioning, we can infer both likely utilize AMOLED panels with high refresh rates. The Realme GT Neo 5, historically, has focused on display quality, potentially offering higher peak brightness and color accuracy. The OnePlus Ace 5 Racing, being a 'Racing' edition, may prioritize a higher refresh rate for smoother gaming, but without specific data, this remains speculative.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a comprehensive comparison is impossible. However, both phones likely feature multi-camera systems. The Realme GT Neo 5, given Realme’s recent focus, may prioritize a higher-resolution main sensor. The image processing style will likely differ – Realme often leans towards vibrant, saturated colors, while OnePlus typically aims for a more natural look. The absence of information regarding OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) is a significant omission; its presence would be a major advantage for video recording and low-light photography.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Realme GT Neo 5 240W’s Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm) features a Cortex-X2 prime core clocked at 3.19 GHz, alongside Cortex-A710 and A510 performance and efficiency cores. This is a mature platform known for its balance of power and thermal efficiency. Conversely, the OnePlus Ace 5 Racing utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 9400e (4nm) with a unique core configuration: one Cortex-X4 at 3.4 GHz, three more Cortex-X4 cores at 2.85 GHz, and four Cortex-A720 cores at 2.0 GHz. The Dimensity 9400e’s emphasis on X4 cores suggests a focus on sustained performance, but real-world thermal management will be crucial. The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 benefits from extensive software optimization, while the Dimensity 9400e is newer and may require further refinement. Both devices likely feature LPDDR5x RAM, but the speed and configuration could vary, impacting multitasking performance.
Battery Life
The Realme GT Neo 5 240W’s defining feature is its 240W wired charging, capable of reaching 100% in just 10 minutes. This is a substantial advantage over the OnePlus Ace 5 Racing’s 80W charging, which, while still fast, is significantly slower. The OnePlus Ace 5 Racing does offer 33W PPS and 18W PD/QC, providing more versatile charging options, but it cannot compete with the sheer speed of the Realme. Battery capacity is not specified for either device, but the faster charging of the Realme GT Neo 5 240W mitigates the impact of a potentially smaller battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the OnePlus Ace 5 Racing if you need a phone with the newest processor architecture and are willing to trade some charging speed for potential future software optimizations. Buy the Realme GT Neo 5 240W if you prefer the fastest possible charging, a well-established chipset with excellent thermal management, and don't mind a slightly older processor generation.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 in the Realme GT Neo 5 240W throttle during extended gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is known for its relatively good thermal management. While some throttling is inevitable, it's generally well-controlled, providing consistent performance for longer gaming sessions. Realme often incorporates effective cooling solutions in their GT series, further mitigating throttling.
❓ How does the Dimensity 9400e's core configuration impact real-world performance in the OnePlus Ace 5 Racing?
The Dimensity 9400e's emphasis on Cortex-X4 cores suggests a focus on sustained performance. However, the effectiveness of this configuration depends heavily on software optimization and thermal management. It's possible the phone will excel in tasks that can fully utilize all cores, but may exhibit inconsistencies if not properly optimized.
❓ Is the 240W charging of the Realme GT Neo 5 240W safe for the battery's long-term health?
Realme has implemented several safety measures to protect the battery during 240W charging, including specialized charging chips and optimized charging algorithms. While extremely fast charging *can* theoretically degrade battery health faster, Realme claims to have mitigated these risks. Long-term testing is needed to fully assess the impact.
