The OnePlus Ace 5 Racing and OnePlus 11R represent distinct approaches to delivering high-performance Android experiences. The Ace 5 Racing, with its newer Mediatek Dimensity 9400e chipset, aims for efficiency and sustained performance. The 11R, leveraging the established Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, prioritizes raw power and faster charging. This comparison dissects their strengths and weaknesses to determine which phone best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained gaming and efficient power usage, the OnePlus Ace 5 Racing emerges as the winner. Its Dimensity 9400e chipset, while not topping benchmarks, offers a compelling balance of performance and thermal management. However, the OnePlus 11R’s 100W charging is a significant advantage for those who value speed.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE (3CA), 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | CDMA 800 |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, May 27 | 2023, February 07 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, May 27 | Available. Released 2023, February 21 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.6 x 76 x 8.2 mm (6.44 x 2.99 x 0.32 in) | 163.4 x 74.3 x 8.7 mm (6.43 x 2.93 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 200 g (7.05 oz) | 204 g (7.20 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Crystal Shield Glass | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2392 pixels (~387 ppi density) | 1240 x 2772 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~451 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.77 inches, 111.5 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.74 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~90.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR Vivid, 800 nits (typ), 1300 nits (HBM) | Fluid AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1450 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9400e (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G720 MC12 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, OxygenOS 15 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 18GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 23mm (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 33W PPS, 18W PD/QC
Bypass charging | 100W wired |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 7100 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Green | Galactic Silver, Sonic Black, Solar Red |
| Models | PLF110 | CPH2487 |
| Price | About 220 EUR | About 600 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.16 W/kg (head) 0.61 W/kg (body) |
OnePlus Ace 5 Racing
- Potentially better sustained performance due to Dimensity 9400e's architecture.
- More efficient processor leading to potentially better battery life.
- 80W charging with PPS and PD/QC for wider compatibility.
- May not match the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 in peak CPU performance.
- Charging speed is slower than the OnePlus 11R.
OnePlus 11R
- Faster 100W wired charging for quick top-ups.
- Established Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 platform with optimized software.
- Strong raw CPU performance for demanding tasks.
- Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is known to throttle under sustained load.
- Potentially less efficient than the Dimensity 9400e.
Display Comparison
Both devices are expected to feature high refresh rate AMOLED displays, though specific details like peak brightness and color accuracy are not provided. The absence of LTPO technology in either device suggests a less adaptive refresh rate, potentially impacting battery life. Bezels are likely similar given both phones target a similar market segment. Without specific display specs, it's difficult to definitively declare a winner; however, OnePlus's history suggests both will deliver vibrant and sharp visuals.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is challenging. However, given the price points, both phones likely employ similar sensor setups, focusing on a primary wide-angle lens with OIS. The OnePlus 11R, being slightly older, may have benefited from more software optimization. The Ace 5 Racing’s newer ISP within the Dimensity 9400e could offer improved image processing capabilities, particularly in low-light conditions. We can assume both phones will include ultrawide and potentially macro lenses, but their quality is likely to be secondary to the main sensor.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The OnePlus Ace 5 Racing’s Mediatek Dimensity 9400e (4nm) utilizes a tri-cluster configuration with a Cortex-X4 prime core clocked at 3.4GHz, alongside three more Cortex-X4 cores at 2.85GHz, and four Cortex-A720 efficiency cores. This contrasts with the OnePlus 11R’s Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm), featuring a single Cortex-X2 prime core at 3.0GHz, three Cortex-A710 performance cores at 2.5GHz, and four Cortex-A510 efficiency cores. While the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 historically benchmarks higher in raw CPU power, the Dimensity 9400e’s newer architecture and more numerous high-performance cores suggest it may excel in multi-threaded tasks and sustained performance. The 9400e’s architecture is designed to mitigate throttling, a common issue with the 8+ Gen 1 under prolonged load. Both phones likely utilize LPDDR5x RAM, but the speed and configuration could vary, impacting overall system responsiveness.
Battery Life
The OnePlus 11R boasts 100W wired charging, enabling a significantly faster 0-100% charge time compared to the Ace 5 Racing’s 80W charging. The Ace 5 Racing compensates with 33W PPS and 18W PD/QC support, offering broader compatibility. While battery capacity isn't specified, the 11R’s faster charging is a clear advantage for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly. The Ace 5 Racing’s more efficient chipset may offset a potentially smaller battery capacity, resulting in comparable real-world battery life, especially for moderate users.
Buying Guide
Buy the OnePlus Ace 5 Racing if you need a phone that can maintain consistent performance during extended gaming sessions and appreciate the benefits of a more efficient processor. Buy the OnePlus 11R if you prioritize the absolute fastest charging speeds and are willing to potentially manage some thermal throttling during demanding tasks. The 11R is also a better choice for users heavily invested in the Qualcomm ecosystem.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Dimensity 9400e in the Ace 5 Racing overheat during prolonged gaming sessions like PUBG or Genshin Impact?
The Dimensity 9400e is designed with thermal efficiency in mind, utilizing a 4nm process and a more balanced core configuration. While no phone is immune to throttling, the 9400e is expected to maintain higher sustained performance levels compared to the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, which is known to throttle more aggressively under heavy load. Expect playable frame rates for extended periods, though some minor dips may occur.
❓ Does the OnePlus 11R's 100W charging degrade the battery health faster than the Ace 5 Racing's 80W charging?
While faster charging can theoretically contribute to slightly faster battery degradation over the long term, OnePlus implements charging management technologies to mitigate this effect. The difference in degradation between 80W and 100W is likely to be minimal for most users. The convenience of significantly faster charging often outweighs the potential for a small reduction in long-term battery health.
❓ Is the Mediatek Dimensity 9400e chipset as good for custom ROM development as the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1?
Historically, Snapdragon chipsets have enjoyed broader support within the custom ROM community due to more readily available documentation and developer tools. However, Mediatek has been actively improving its developer support in recent years. While the 9400e may initially have less custom ROM support than the 8+ Gen 1, this is likely to improve over time.
