OnePlus Ace 5 Pro vs Xiaomi 13T: A Deep Dive into Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing peak performance and rapid charging, the OnePlus Ace 5 Pro is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset offers a significant advantage in demanding tasks. However, the Xiaomi 13T provides excellent battery life and a bright display, making it a strong contender for those valuing longevity and visual experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | OnePlus Ace 5 Pro | Xiaomi 13T |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 83, 84, 89 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, December 26 | 2023, September 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, December 31 | Available. Released 2023, September 26 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Crystal Shield Glass), glass back (Crystal Shield Glass), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back or silicone polymer back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 161.7 x 75.8 x 8.1 mm (6.37 x 2.98 x 0.32 in) | 162.2 x 75.7 x 8.5 mm (6.39 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 203 g or 217 g (7.16 oz) | 193 g or 197 g (6.81 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Crystal Shield Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1264 x 2780 pixels (~450 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.7 cm2 (~91.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 800 nits (typ), 1600 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 144Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1200 nits (HBM), 2600 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x4.32 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix L + 6x3.53 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix M) | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 Ultra (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 830 | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| OS | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Leica lens, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/1.9, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.88", 0.61µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 15mm (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30fps (HDR10+), 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, HDR10+ |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 100W wired, 33W PPS, 18W PD/QC, 55% in 15 min, 100% in 35 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 6100 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Gray, White, Purple | Alpine Blue, Meadow Green, Black |
| Models | PKR110 | 2306EPN60G |
| Price | About 450 EUR | $ 255.96 / £ 326.27 / € 204.18 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
OnePlus Ace 5 Pro
- Unmatched processing power with Snapdragon 8 Elite
- Blazing-fast 100W wired charging
- Potentially superior thermal management due to 3nm process
- Battery life likely inferior to Xiaomi 13T
- Display specifications currently unknown
Xiaomi 13T
- Excellent battery life (12:23h active use)
- Bright and vibrant 1264 nit display
- Versatile camera system (likely)
- Less powerful chipset compared to Snapdragon 8 Elite
- Slower charging speed (67W)
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi 13T boasts a measured peak brightness of 1264 nits, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the OnePlus Ace 5 Pro’s display specifications aren’t provided, OnePlus typically employs high-quality AMOLED panels. The 13T’s brightness advantage is significant, and its panel technology likely prioritizes color accuracy and viewing angles. Without further details on the Ace 5 Pro’s panel, the 13T holds a clear edge in display quality based on measured data.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specifications for both devices are limited. However, the market positioning suggests the Xiaomi 13T will likely feature a more versatile camera system. While the Ace 5 Pro may prioritize raw processing power for image enhancement, the 13T’s camera system is likely tuned for a wider range of shooting scenarios. Without specific sensor details, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner, but Xiaomi’s history suggests a focus on camera features and image quality.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The OnePlus Ace 5 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Elite (3nm) utilizes Qualcomm’s Oryon V2 Phoenix cores, with a 2x4.32 GHz prime core configuration, promising substantial performance gains over the Xiaomi 13T’s Dimensity 8200 Ultra (4nm). The Dimensity 8200 Ultra’s octa-core setup, with a single 3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 core, is capable, but the Snapdragon 8 Elite’s architecture and smaller node size translate to superior CPU and GPU performance. This difference will be most noticeable in graphically demanding games and resource-intensive applications. The 3nm process of the Snapdragon 8 Elite also implies better thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during sustained workloads.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi 13T shines in battery endurance, achieving an active use score of 12:23h and an endurance rating of 101h. The OnePlus Ace 5 Pro, while offering incredibly fast 100W wired charging (55% in 15 minutes, 100% in 35 minutes), doesn’t disclose battery capacity. The 13T’s 67W charging (100% in 42 minutes) is slower, but its superior battery life provides a significant advantage for users who prioritize all-day usage. The Ace 5 Pro’s charging speed is a compelling feature, but the 13T’s longevity is more practical for many users.
Buying Guide
Buy the OnePlus Ace 5 Pro if you need uncompromising processing power for gaming, video editing, or other intensive applications, and if minimizing charging time is a priority. Buy the Xiaomi 13T if you prefer a phone with exceptional battery endurance, a vibrant display for media consumption, and a more balanced overall experience without sacrificing significant performance.