OnePlus Ace 5 Pro vs. vivo iQOO 12 Pro: A Head-to-Head Performance and Charging Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-around features and convenience, the vivo iQOO 12 Pro emerges as the winner. Its 120W wired and 50W wireless charging, coupled with the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s proven efficiency, offer a more versatile package. However, gamers and power users seeking maximum CPU performance may find the OnePlus Ace 5 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Elite compelling.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | OnePlus Ace 5 Pro | vivo iQOO 12 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 83, 84, 89 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 66, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, December 26 | 2023, November 07 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, December 31 | Available. Released 2023, November 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Crystal Shield Glass), glass back (Crystal Shield Glass), aluminum frame | - |
| Dimensions | 161.7 x 75.8 x 8.1 mm (6.37 x 2.98 x 0.32 in) | 164.6 x 75.4 x 8.6 mm or 8.8 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 203 g or 217 g (7.16 oz) | 205 g or 210 g (7.23 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Crystal Shield Glass | - |
| Resolution | 1264 x 2780 pixels (~450 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~518 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.7 cm2 (~91.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~89.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 800 nits (typ), 1600 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1600 nits (HBM), 3000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x4.32 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix L + 6x3.53 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix M) | Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm) | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 830 | Adreno 750 |
| OS | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 14, up to 2 major Android upgrades, Funtouch 14 (International), OriginOS 4 (China) |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.3", 1.2µm, ulti-directional PDAF, OIS 64 MP, f/2.6, 70mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 8K@30fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 100W wired, 33W PPS, 18W PD/QC, 55% in 15 min, 100% in 35 min | 120W wired 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 6100 mAh | 5100 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Gray, White, Purple | Black, Red, White (BMW M branding) |
| Models | PKR110 | V2329A |
| Price | About 450 EUR | About 650 EUR |
OnePlus Ace 5 Pro
- Potentially higher CPU performance due to Snapdragon 8 Elite and Oryon cores.
- 3nm process *could* offer better thermal efficiency.
- Focus on raw power for demanding tasks.
- Lacks wireless charging.
- Potential for higher thermal throttling under sustained load.
- Less versatile charging options.
vivo iQOO 12 Pro
- Faster 120W wired charging and 50W wireless charging.
- More established Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 platform.
- Likely more refined camera system.
- Reverse wireless charging capability.
- CPU performance may be slightly lower than the Ace 5 Pro.
- 4nm process may run slightly warmer under extreme load.
- Potentially higher price point.
Display Comparison
While both devices are expected to feature high-refresh-rate AMOLED displays, specific details like peak brightness and color accuracy are not provided. However, the iQOO series historically prioritizes vibrant, color-accurate displays. The absence of LTPO information for the Ace 5 Pro suggests it may not dynamically adjust refresh rates as efficiently as some iQOO models, potentially impacting battery life. Bezels are likely comparable given both brands' focus on maximizing screen real estate.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is difficult. However, iQOO phones often emphasize camera capabilities, and the 12 Pro is likely to feature a sophisticated camera system with OIS. The Ace 5 Pro, while capable, typically prioritizes performance over camera innovation. Lens apertures and sensor sizes will be crucial differentiators, but without that data, we can only speculate that the iQOO 12 Pro will offer a more versatile and refined camera experience.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The OnePlus Ace 5 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Elite (3nm) utilizes Oryon V2 Phoenix cores, promising significant CPU gains over the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) in the iQOO 12 Pro. The 4.32 GHz Oryon cores represent a substantial clock speed advantage. However, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 benefits from architectural improvements and a more mature software ecosystem. The iQOO 12 Pro’s LPDDR5x RAM is standard for flagships, while the Ace 5 Pro’s RAM configuration is unknown, potentially impacting multitasking performance. The 3nm process of the Snapdragon 8 Elite *should* translate to better thermal efficiency, but the higher clock speeds could negate some of that advantage under sustained load.
Battery Life
The iQOO 12 Pro’s 120W wired charging is significantly faster than the Ace 5 Pro’s 100W, allowing for a full charge in less time. The addition of 50W wireless charging and 10W reverse wireless charging on the iQOO 12 Pro provides substantial convenience. While the Ace 5 Pro’s 35-minute full charge is respectable, the iQOO 12 Pro’s faster charging mitigates any potential battery capacity differences. The iQOO 12 Pro’s charging ecosystem is demonstrably more versatile.
Buying Guide
Buy the OnePlus Ace 5 Pro if you need uncompromising CPU performance for demanding tasks like video editing or emulation, and are willing to sacrifice wireless charging and potentially deal with slightly higher thermal output. Buy the vivo iQOO 12 Pro if you prefer a more balanced experience with faster overall charging speeds (including wireless), a wider range of features, and a more refined software experience geared towards everyday use.