OnePlus Ace 5 Pro vs vivo iQOO 11S: A Head-to-Head Battle of Snapdragon Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the vivo iQOO 11S emerges as the more compelling choice. Its 200W charging dramatically reduces downtime, and the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 provides excellent, well-optimized performance. While the Ace 5 Pro’s Oryon cores offer theoretical advantages, the iQOO 11S delivers a more consistently polished experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | OnePlus Ace 5 Pro | vivo iQOO 11S |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 83, 84, 89 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, December 26 | 2023, July 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, December 31 | Available. Released 2023, July 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Crystal Shield Glass), glass back (Crystal Shield Glass), aluminum frame | - |
| Dimensions | 161.7 x 75.8 x 8.1 mm (6.37 x 2.98 x 0.32 in) | 164.9 x 77.1 x 8.4 mm or 8.7 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 203 g or 217 g (7.16 oz) | 207 g or 210 g (7.30 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Crystal Shield Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1264 x 2780 pixels (~450 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~518 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.7 cm2 (~91.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~87.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 800 nits (typ), 1600 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak) | LTPO4 AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x4.32 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix L + 6x3.53 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix M) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 830 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 13, OriginOS 3 (China) |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/1.49", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.5, 47mm (telephoto), PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm (ultrawide) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 100W wired, 33W PPS, 18W PD/QC, 55% in 15 min, 100% in 35 min | 200W wired, PD3.0, UFCS |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 6100 mAh | 4700 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Gray, White, Purple | Black, Sky Blue, Legendary White (BMW M branding) |
| Models | PKR110 | V2304A |
| Price | About 450 EUR | About 500 EUR |
OnePlus Ace 5 Pro
- Potentially higher CPU performance with Snapdragon 8 Elite and Oryon cores.
- 3nm process *could* lead to improved efficiency (though high clocks may offset this).
- 100W fast charging is still very competitive.
- Potential for higher thermal throttling under sustained load.
- Oryon architecture is unproven in the mobile space, potentially leading to software optimization issues.
vivo iQOO 11S
- Industry-leading 200W wired charging for incredibly fast top-ups.
- Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 offers excellent, well-optimized performance.
- Mature software optimization and thermal management.
- Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 is a generation older than the 8 Elite.
- May not match the Ace 5 Pro in peak CPU performance.
Display Comparison
Neither device’s display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the flagship positioning, both likely feature high refresh rate AMOLED panels. The iQOO series often prioritizes high brightness, while OnePlus tends to focus on color accuracy. The absence of LTPO information suggests potential differences in adaptive refresh rate efficiency, impacting battery life. Bezels are expected to be minimal on both, reflecting current design trends.
Camera Comparison
Without sensor details, a detailed camera comparison is impossible. However, both brands typically employ high-resolution main sensors. The iQOO series often leans towards vibrant, saturated colors, while OnePlus aims for a more natural look. The absence of information regarding OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) is a significant omission; its presence is crucial for stable video recording and low-light photography. The focus should be on the primary sensor's size and aperture, as these directly impact image quality. Any 2MP macro or depth sensors are likely to be of limited utility.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The OnePlus Ace 5 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Elite (3nm) with its Oryon V2 Phoenix CPU architecture promises significant gains in single-core and multi-core performance compared to the iQOO 11S’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm). The 4.32 GHz Oryon cores are clocked higher than the Gen 2’s 3.2 GHz Cortex-X3. However, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 benefits from mature optimization and a proven track record. The 3nm process of the 8 Elite *should* offer better thermal efficiency, but the higher clock speeds could negate this advantage. Both utilize LPDDR5x RAM, but the speed isn't specified, making a direct comparison impossible. The iQOO 11S’s Gen 2 is likely to provide a more consistent, sustained performance level due to its thermal characteristics.
Battery Life
The iQOO 11S’s 200W wired charging is a game-changer, promising a full charge in under 40 minutes. The Ace 5 Pro’s 100W charging is still fast, taking 35 minutes, but the iQOO 11S offers a substantial time saving. The iQOO 11S also supports PD3.0 and UFCS, offering broader compatibility. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the iQOO 11S’s charging speed effectively mitigates the impact of a potentially smaller battery, allowing for quick top-ups throughout the day. The Ace 5 Pro supports 33W PPS and 18W PD/QC, offering flexibility but lacking the sheer speed of the iQOO 11S.
Buying Guide
Buy the OnePlus Ace 5 Pro if you prioritize raw CPU performance for demanding tasks like video editing or emulation and are willing to manage potentially higher thermal output. Buy the vivo iQOO 11S if you value incredibly fast charging, a refined user experience, and a more balanced thermal profile, making it ideal for extended gaming sessions and daily use.