OnePlus Ace 5 Pro vs. OnePlus 12R: A Deep Dive into Snapdragon Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing peak performance and fastest charging, the OnePlus Ace 5 Pro is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Elite delivers a noticeable edge in demanding tasks. However, the OnePlus 12R offers exceptional battery life and a more refined, all-day experience, making it ideal for mainstream users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | OnePlus Ace 5 Pro | OnePlus 12R |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 83, 84, 89 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, December 26 | 2024, January 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, December 31 | Available. Released 2024, February 06 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Crystal Shield Glass), glass back (Crystal Shield Glass), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), aluminum frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 161.7 x 75.8 x 8.1 mm (6.37 x 2.98 x 0.32 in) | 163.3 x 75.3 x 8.8 mm (6.43 x 2.96 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time)· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 203 g or 217 g (7.16 oz) | 207 g (7.30 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Crystal Shield Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Resolution | 1264 x 2780 pixels (~450 ppi density) | 1264 x 2780 pixels (~450 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.7 cm2 (~91.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.7 cm2 (~90.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 800 nits (typ), 1600 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak) | LTPO4 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 1600 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x4.32 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix L + 6x3.53 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix M) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 830 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, OxygenOS 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 100W wired, 33W PPS, 18W PD/QC, 55% in 15 min, 100% in 35 min | 100W wired, 100% in 26 min |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 6100 mAh | Li-Ion 5500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Gray, White, Purple | Iron Gray, Cool Blue, Electric Violet, Sunset Dune |
| Models | PKR110 | CPH2609, CPH2585, CPH2611 |
| Price | About 450 EUR | € 410.84 / $ 399.95 / £ 649.00 |
| SAR | - | 1.19 W/kg (head) 0.82 W/kg (body) |
OnePlus Ace 5 Pro
- Superior CPU performance with Snapdragon 8 Elite
- Faster charging with broader compatibility (PPS, PD/QC)
- Potential for higher sustained performance due to 3nm process
- Likely shorter battery life due to more powerful chipset
- Slower full charge time compared to the 12R
- Camera specs unknown, potential for lower quality
OnePlus 12R
- Excellent battery life (14:32h active use)
- Faster full charge time (26 minutes)
- High peak display brightness (1181 nits)
- Less powerful CPU compared to Snapdragon 8 Elite
- May experience more throttling under sustained load
- Potentially less future-proof chipset
Display Comparison
The OnePlus 12R boasts a display capable of reaching 1181 nits of peak brightness, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the Ace 5 Pro’s display specs are not provided, the 12R’s brightness level is a significant advantage for outdoor use. The 12R’s panel likely utilizes LTPO technology, contributing to power efficiency, though this isn’t explicitly stated. Without knowing the Ace 5 Pro’s panel type, it’s difficult to assess its power consumption relative to the 12R.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specifications for the Ace 5 Pro are unavailable. The OnePlus 12R’s camera system, while not detailed in the provided data, is expected to feature a capable main sensor. Without knowing the sensor size, aperture, or OIS implementation on either device, a direct comparison is impossible. However, the 12R’s image processing algorithms, refined through OnePlus’s software experience, are likely to deliver consistent results. We can assume both phones will have a multi-camera setup, but the Ace 5 Pro’s potential for higher-end sensors remains unknown.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The OnePlus Ace 5 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Elite (3nm) utilizes Oryon V2 Phoenix cores, promising a substantial performance leap over the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm) in the OnePlus 12R. The 8 Elite’s architecture – 2x4.32 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix L + 6x3.53 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix M – suggests a focus on sustained performance, potentially mitigating throttling. The 12R’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, with its Cortex-X3 prime core, is still incredibly capable, but the 3nm process and Oryon cores of the 8 Elite give the Ace 5 Pro a theoretical advantage in CPU-bound tasks. Both devices likely utilize LPDDR5x RAM, but the Ace 5 Pro’s chipset is expected to benefit more from the faster memory bandwidth.
Battery Life
The OnePlus 12R shines in battery endurance, achieving an active use score of 14:32 hours. While the Ace 5 Pro’s battery capacity is not specified, its more powerful chipset is likely to consume more power. Both phones support 100W wired charging, but the 12R achieves a full charge in 26 minutes, while the Ace 5 Pro takes 35 minutes. The Ace 5 Pro’s charging includes 33W PPS and 18W PD/QC, offering broader compatibility, but the 12R’s faster overall charge time is a significant convenience.
Buying Guide
Buy the OnePlus Ace 5 Pro if you are a power user, mobile gamer, or someone who frequently engages in resource-intensive tasks and values the absolute fastest charging speeds. Buy the OnePlus 12R if you prioritize all-day battery life, a consistently smooth experience, and a more balanced feature set without sacrificing significant performance.