OnePlus Ace 3 vs Xiaomi 14T Pro: A Deep Dive into Flagship Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi 14T Pro emerges as the stronger contender. Its Dimensity 9300+ chipset offers a performance edge, coupled with significantly faster 120W wired and 50W wireless charging. While the Ace 3 remains a capable device, the 14T Pro’s superior charging and processing power justify its position.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | OnePlus Ace 3 | Xiaomi 14T Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, January 04 | 2024, September 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, January 15 | Available. Released 2024, September 26 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame, glass back (Panda X) |
| Dimensions | 163.3 x 75.3 x 8.8 mm (6.43 x 2.96 x 0.35 in) | 160.4 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.31 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· eSIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 207 g (7.30 oz) | 209 g (7.37 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1264 x 2780 pixels (~450 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.7 cm2 (~90.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 1600 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 144Hz, 3840Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1600 nits (HBM), 4000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 740 | Immortalis-G720 MC12 |
| OS | Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Leica lens, Ultra HDR, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 60mm (telephoto), 1/2.88", 0.61µm, PDAF, 2.6x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 15mm (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 8K@24/30fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, gyro-EIS, 10-bit Rec. 2020, HDR10+ |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/3.44", 0.64µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, HDR10+ |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.4, A2DP, LE, LHDC |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1C+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), GLONASS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 100W wired, 100% in 27 min | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 19 min 50W wireless, 100% in 45 min |
| Type | 5500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Rose Gold | Titan Gray, Titan Blue, Titan Black |
| Models | PJE110 | 2407FPN8EG |
| Price | About 340 EUR | $ 550.00 / £ 498.00 / € 539.99 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
OnePlus Ace 3
- Proven Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 performance
- Potentially more refined software experience
- Sleek and understated design
- Slower charging speeds (100W wired only)
- Lacks wireless charging
- Potentially less powerful CPU compared to Dimensity 9300+
Xiaomi 14T Pro
- Cutting-edge Dimensity 9300+ chipset
- Ultra-fast 120W wired and 50W wireless charging
- Brighter display for outdoor visibility
- MIUI software may not appeal to all users
- Potential for software bloat
- Thermal management needs to be verified under sustained load
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi 14T Pro boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1228 nits, compared to an unspecified peak brightness for the Ace 3. This translates to better visibility under direct sunlight. While both utilize 4nm chipsets, display technology details beyond brightness are missing for the Ace 3. The 14T Pro’s higher brightness is a clear advantage for outdoor users and media consumption. We expect both to have high refresh rate panels, but the 14T Pro’s brightness gives it an edge.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for either device, a direct comparison is limited. However, the market positioning suggests the Xiaomi 14T Pro may prioritize camera capabilities. Xiaomi often focuses heavily on camera technology, and the Dimensity 9300+’s ISP capabilities could contribute to improved image processing. The Ace 3 is likely to offer a solid camera experience, but the 14T Pro has the potential to excel in this area, assuming it incorporates a high-resolution sensor and advanced features.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 in the Ace 3 versus MediaTek’s Dimensity 9300+ in the 14T Pro. The Dimensity 9300+ features a unique CPU configuration with a 1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4 prime core and three additional Cortex-X4 cores, potentially offering superior multi-core performance compared to the Ace 3’s 1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 and two Cortex-A715 cores. The 14T Pro’s CPU architecture suggests a performance advantage in demanding tasks and sustained workloads. Both phones utilize a 4nm process, but the newer architecture of the Dimensity 9300+ is likely to be more efficient.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi 14T Pro shines in charging speed, supporting 120W wired charging, achieving a full charge in just 19 minutes. It also includes 50W wireless charging, taking 45 minutes to fully charge. The OnePlus Ace 3 offers 100W wired charging, taking 27 minutes for a full charge, and lacks wireless charging. While the 14T Pro’s battery capacity isn’t specified, its active use score of 12:32h suggests excellent battery life. The faster charging speeds of the 14T Pro are a significant convenience factor, especially for power users.
Buying Guide
Buy the OnePlus Ace 3 if you prioritize a well-established software experience and a slightly more conservative, refined design. It’s ideal for users who value stability and a proven track record. Buy the Xiaomi 14T Pro if you demand the absolute latest in processing power, blazing-fast charging speeds, and are comfortable with Xiaomi’s MIUI software, which offers extensive customization options.