The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the OnePlus Ace 2V and Xiaomi Poco F5 are two strong contenders vying for your attention. Both offer impressive specs and features at attractive price points, but which one truly comes out on top? Let's dive into a comprehensive comparison to help you decide.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Poco F5 edges out the Ace 2V thanks to its brighter display, efficient Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 chipset, and slightly longer charging time. While the Ace 2V boasts a powerful Dimensity 9000, the Poco F5 offers a more well-rounded package for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA 800 | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, March 07 | 2023, May 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, March 15 | Available. Released 2023, May |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Asahi Glass), aluminum frame, glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 162.6 x 75.1 x 8.2 mm (6.40 x 2.96 x 0.32 in) | 161.1 x 75 x 7.9 mm (6.34 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 191.5 g (6.77 oz) | 181 g (6.38 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Asahi Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1240 x 2772 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~451 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.74 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~89.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1100 nits (HBM), 1450 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 120Hz, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x2.91 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.49 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM7475-AB Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G710 MC10 | Adreno 725 |
| OS | Android 13, ColorOS 13 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 100% in 32 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 46 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue/Green | Black, Blue, White |
| Models | PHP110 | 23049PCD8G, 23049PCD8I |
| Price | About 310 EUR | € 202.76 / $ 289.99 / ₹ 23,790 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 118h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-24.3 LUFS (Very good)
|
OnePlus Ace 2V
- Powerful Dimensity 9000 chipset
- Fast 80W charging
- Good value for performance
- Less bright display compared to Poco F5
- Potentially higher temperatures under load
- Camera performance needs further evaluation
Xiaomi Poco F5
- Bright and vibrant display (963 nits)
- Efficient Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 chipset
- Excellent battery life (118h endurance)
- Fast 67W charging
- Performance slightly lower than Ace 2V in demanding scenarios
- Design may not appeal to everyone
Display Comparison
The Poco F5 takes the display crown with a measured peak brightness of 963 nits, offering significantly better visibility in direct sunlight. While the Ace 2V has a good display, it lacks the same level of brightness. The Poco F5's infinite contrast ratio also contributes to a more immersive viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems, but detailed camera comparisons are needed to determine a clear winner. The Poco F5 likely benefits from Qualcomm's image processing capabilities. Expect both to deliver good results in well-lit conditions, but low-light performance may vary.
Performance
The OnePlus Ace 2V's Dimensity 9000 chipset delivers impressive raw performance, potentially excelling in graphically intensive games. However, the Poco F5's Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 is remarkably efficient and provides smooth performance for everyday tasks and most games, often with better thermal management.
Battery Life
The Poco F5 demonstrates exceptional battery life, boasting an endurance rating of 118 hours. The Ace 2V's battery life is respectable, but not as impressive. The Poco F5's 67W charging is also slightly faster than the Ace 2V's 80W, though both offer rapid charging capabilities.
Buying Guide
The OnePlus Ace 2V is ideal for users prioritizing raw processing power for demanding games and applications. The Xiaomi Poco F5 is a better choice for those seeking a vibrant display, excellent battery life, and a balanced overall experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The OnePlus Ace 2V likely has a slight edge in demanding games due to its more powerful chipset, but the Poco F5 offers excellent performance and better thermal management for most games.
❓ Is the Poco F5's display worth the extra cost?
If you value a bright, vibrant display for media consumption and outdoor use, the Poco F5's display is a significant upgrade over the Ace 2V.
