OnePlus Ace 2 vs. ZTE nubia Z50S Pro: A Deep Dive into Flagship Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-around performance and battery longevity, the ZTE nubia Z50S Pro emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 8+ Gen 2 chipset and impressive 12:29h active use battery life provide a noticeable advantage over the Ace 2, despite the latter’s faster 100W charging.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | OnePlus Ace 2 | ZTE nubia Z50S Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA 800 | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, February 07 | 2023, July 20 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, February 13 | Available. Released 2023, July 27 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Asahi Glass), aluminum frame, glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass front, silicone polymer back (eco leather), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.4 x 74.3 x 8.7 mm (6.43 x 2.93 x 0.34 in) | 163.9 x 76.3 x 8.3 mm (6.45 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 204 g (7.20 oz) | 228 g (8.04 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Asahi Glass | - |
| Resolution | 1240 x 2772 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~451 ppi density) | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~452 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.74 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~90.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.8 inches, 111.6 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+ | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.36 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AC Snapdragon 8+ Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 740 (719 MHz) |
| OS | Android 13, ColorOS 13 | Android 13, MyOS 13, no planned android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 18GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.6, 35mm (standard), 1/1.49", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.4, 80mm (telephoto), 1/4.4", PDAF, OIS, optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 13mm, 125˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.88", 0.61µm, AF |
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | - |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p, gyro-EIS, 10-bit |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | - |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band or tri-band (market/region dependent), Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 100W wired, 100% in 25 min | 80W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5100 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Glacier Blue, Red | Black, Khaki, Silver/White |
| Models | PHK110 | NX713J |
| Price | About 390 EUR | About 800 EUR |
OnePlus Ace 2
- Ultra-fast 100W charging
- Potentially more affordable price
- Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 offers strong performance
- Likely shorter battery life than Z50S Pro
- Less efficient chipset may lead to more throttling
- Limited display brightness information
ZTE nubia Z50S Pro
- Superior Snapdragon 8+ Gen 2 performance
- Excellent 12:29h active use battery life
- Brighter 1029 nit display
- Slower 80W charging
- Potentially higher price
- Camera details are limited
Display Comparison
The ZTE nubia Z50S Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1029 nits, compared to an unspecified peak brightness for the OnePlus Ace 2. This higher brightness translates to better visibility under direct sunlight. While both likely utilize AMOLED panels, the Z50S Pro’s brightness suggests a potentially more advanced panel generation. The Ace 2’s display specifications are currently limited, making a detailed comparison of color accuracy and refresh rate difficult, but the Z50S Pro’s brightness is a clear advantage for outdoor use.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specifications for both devices are limited. However, the nubia Z50S Pro’s marketing emphasizes its photographic capabilities, suggesting a more robust camera system. Without knowing sensor sizes, lens apertures, or image processing algorithms, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. The Ace 2’s camera is likely competent, but the Z50S Pro’s focus on photography suggests a potential advantage in image quality and features. We can assume both phones will offer a standard suite of camera modes, but the Z50S Pro may offer more advanced options.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the OnePlus Ace 2 utilizes the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, while the ZTE nubia Z50S Pro features the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 2. This generational leap is significant. The 8+ Gen 2’s Cortex-X3 prime core, clocked at 3.36 GHz, offers a performance uplift over the Ace 2’s 3.19 GHz Cortex-X2. Furthermore, the 8+ Gen 2’s improved architecture and 4nm process node provide better thermal efficiency, reducing throttling during extended gaming sessions. The Z50S Pro’s CPU configuration (1x3.36GHz, 2x2.8GHz, 2x2.8GHz, 3x2.0GHz) is optimized for both peak performance and sustained workloads, while the Ace 2’s (1x3.19GHz, 3x2.75GHz, 4x1.80GHz) leans more towards burst performance. Both phones likely utilize LPDDR5X RAM, but the chipset difference will be the dominant factor in real-world performance.
Battery Life
The ZTE nubia Z50S Pro shines in battery life, achieving an impressive 12:29h of active use. While the OnePlus Ace 2’s battery capacity is unknown, its 100W wired charging is significantly faster than the Z50S Pro’s 80W. This means the Ace 2 can fully charge in approximately 25 minutes, while the Z50S Pro will take longer. However, the Z50S Pro’s superior battery life means you may not need to charge as frequently. The trade-off is speed versus longevity; the Ace 2 prioritizes quick top-ups, while the Z50S Pro focuses on maximizing time between charges.
Buying Guide
Buy the OnePlus Ace 2 if you need blazing-fast 100W charging and are willing to trade some sustained performance and battery life for a more affordable price point. It’s ideal for users who frequently top up their phones throughout the day. Buy the ZTE nubia Z50S Pro if you prioritize long-lasting battery life, smoother gaming experiences, and a brighter, more vibrant display, and are willing to spend a bit more for the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 2’s superior efficiency.