The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the OnePlus Ace 2 and Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro are two of the hottest contenders. Both pack powerful Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipsets, but they differ significantly in other areas. Let's dive into a comprehensive comparison to help you decide which one is right for you.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Poco F5 Pro edges out the Ace 2 thanks to its brighter display, faster wireless charging, and impressive battery life. While the Ace 2 boasts quicker wired charging, the Poco's overall package offers a more compelling experience, especially for media consumption and extended use. It's a close call, though!
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA 800 | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, February 07 | 2023, May 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, February 13 | Available. Released 2023, May |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Asahi Glass), aluminum frame, glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.4 x 74.3 x 8.7 mm (6.43 x 2.93 x 0.34 in) | 162.8 x 75.4 x 8.6 mm (6.41 x 2.97 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 204 g (7.20 oz) | 204 g (7.20 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Asahi Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1240 x 2772 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~451 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.74 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~90.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+ | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (HBM), 1400 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 13, ColorOS 13 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 18GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | - |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 100W wired, 100% in 25 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 50% in 15 min
30W wireless, 50% in 32 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Glacier Blue, Red | Black, White |
| Models | PHK110 | 23013PC75G |
| Price | About 390 EUR | $ 449.99 / € 241.85 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.00 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 99h |
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.2 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 1057977 (v9)
GeekBench: 4001 (v5.1), 4009 (v6)
GFXBench: 50fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
OnePlus Ace 2
- Blazing-fast 100W wired charging
- Potentially more streamlined OxygenOS software
- Powerful Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset
- Less impressive display brightness
- No wireless charging
- Camera potentially less versatile than Poco F5 Pro
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
- Brighter 1059 nits display
- Exceptional 99h battery endurance rating
- 30W wireless charging
- Versatile camera system (likely)
- Slower wired charging (67W)
- MIUI software can be polarizing
- Performance throttling possible under sustained load
Display Comparison
The Poco F5 Pro takes the display crown with a measured peak brightness of 1059 nits, significantly brighter than the Ace 2. While both offer excellent color accuracy and resolution, the Poco's superior brightness makes it more usable outdoors. The 'Infinite' contrast ratio mentioned for the Poco is a nominal value, but suggests excellent blacks and vibrant colors. The Ace 2's display is still good, but not as impressive.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is a key differentiator. While both are described as 'Photo / Video' in the provided specs, general knowledge suggests the Poco F5 Pro likely has a more versatile camera system, potentially with a better ultrawide lens and improved image processing. The Ace 2's camera is competent, but likely not as feature-rich or consistently impressive as the Poco's. Detailed camera samples and reviews would be needed for a definitive verdict.
Performance
Both phones are powered by the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, ensuring flagship-level performance. While the CPU clock speeds differ slightly (Ace 2 has a marginally higher Cortex-X2 clock), real-world performance will be very similar. Expect smooth multitasking, demanding gaming, and snappy app loading on both devices. Thermals will be a factor under sustained load, but both should manage adequately.
Battery Life
The Poco F5 Pro shines in battery life, boasting an endurance rating of 99 hours – a truly remarkable figure. The Ace 2's battery life is good, but not exceptional. The Poco also offers 30W wireless charging, a feature absent on the Ace 2. While the Ace 2 charges faster via wired connection (100W vs 67W), the Poco's overall battery performance and charging versatility give it the edge.
Buying Guide
The OnePlus Ace 2 is ideal for users prioritizing blazing-fast wired charging and a slightly more streamlined software experience. The Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro is a better choice for those who value a vibrant display, wireless charging capabilities, and exceptional battery endurance, all at a competitive price.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better performance?
Both phones offer excellent performance thanks to the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1. Real-world differences will be minimal.
❓ Is the OnePlus Ace 2 worth the extra cost?
It depends on your priorities. If you value the fastest wired charging and a potentially cleaner software experience, the Ace 2 might be worth it. Otherwise, the Poco F5 Pro offers better overall value.
