OnePlus Ace 2 vs. Xiaomi 13T: A Deep Dive into Performance and Battery Life
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing peak gaming performance and the fastest possible charging, the OnePlus Ace 2 is the clear winner. However, the Xiaomi 13T delivers exceptional all-day battery life and a brighter display, making it a more practical choice for everyday users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | OnePlus Ace 2 | Xiaomi 13T |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA 800 | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, February 07 | 2023, September 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, February 13 | Available. Released 2023, September 26 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Asahi Glass), aluminum frame, glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back or silicone polymer back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.4 x 74.3 x 8.7 mm (6.43 x 2.93 x 0.34 in) | 162.2 x 75.7 x 8.5 mm (6.39 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 204 g (7.20 oz) | 193 g or 197 g (6.81 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Asahi Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1240 x 2772 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~451 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.74 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~90.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+ | AMOLED, 68B colors, 144Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1200 nits (HBM), 2600 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 Ultra (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| OS | Android 13, ColorOS 13 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 18GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Leica lens, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | - |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/1.9, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.88", 0.61µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 15mm (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps (HDR10+), 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, HDR10+ |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | - |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 100W wired, 100% in 25 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Glacier Blue, Red | Alpine Blue, Meadow Green, Black |
| Models | PHK110 | 2306EPN60G |
| Price | About 390 EUR | $ 255.96 / £ 326.27 / € 204.18 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
OnePlus Ace 2
- Faster Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 processor for superior gaming
- 100W SuperVOOC charging for incredibly quick top-ups
- Potentially better GPU performance for demanding graphics
- Likely shorter battery life compared to the Xiaomi 13T
- Potential for thermal throttling under sustained heavy load
Xiaomi 13T
- Exceptional battery life with 12:23h active use and 101h endurance
- Brighter display (1264 nits) for better outdoor visibility
- Balanced performance from the Dimensity 8200 Ultra
- Slower charging speed (67W) compared to the OnePlus Ace 2
- Potentially lower peak gaming performance
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi 13T boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1264 nits, making it more visible outdoors under direct sunlight. While the Ace 2’s display specs aren’t provided, Xiaomi’s brightness advantage is substantial. Both utilize 4nm chipsets, suggesting similar power efficiency in display operation, but the 13T’s higher brightness will inevitably draw more power. The absence of LTPO on either device suggests a standard 120Hz refresh rate, potentially impacting battery life compared to adaptive refresh rate technologies.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specs are limited, but the focus should be on the main sensors. Without knowing the sensor sizes or apertures, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. The Xiaomi 13T’s inclusion of 'Photo / Video' suggests a versatile camera system, but the absence of details prevents a thorough analysis. We can assume both phones will offer standard features like night mode and portrait mode, but image processing styles will likely differ. Ignoring the typical 2MP macro lens found on both devices, the quality will hinge on the primary sensor and image processing algorithms.
Performance
The OnePlus Ace 2’s Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm) is architecturally superior for sustained performance. Its Cortex-X2 prime core, clocked at 3.19 GHz, offers a higher peak frequency than the Xiaomi 13T’s Cortex-A78 (3.1 GHz). However, the Dimensity 8200 Ultra’s triple Cortex-A78 core configuration, alongside its efficient Cortex-A55 cores, provides strong multi-core performance. The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is known for its excellent GPU performance, giving the Ace 2 an edge in graphically intensive games. Thermal management will be crucial; the 4nm process helps both, but the Snapdragon’s higher peak power draw may necessitate more aggressive throttling under prolonged load.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi 13T shines in battery endurance, achieving an active use score of 12:23h and an impressive 101-hour endurance rating. This suggests a larger battery capacity and/or more efficient power management compared to the Ace 2. While the Ace 2 offers blazing-fast 100W wired charging (0-100% in 25 minutes), the 13T’s 67W charging (0-100% in 42 minutes) is still respectable. The trade-off is clear: the Ace 2 prioritizes speed, while the 13T prioritizes longevity.
Buying Guide
Buy the OnePlus Ace 2 if you need uncompromising performance for demanding mobile games and applications, and value the convenience of 100W SuperVOOC charging. Buy the Xiaomi 13T if you prioritize long-lasting battery life, a vibrant and bright display for media consumption, and a more balanced overall experience without sacrificing significant performance.