Both the OnePlus Ace 2 and Realme GT Neo 5 240W target the performance-focused Android user, but they approach it with different philosophies. The Ace 2 aims for a balanced flagship experience, while the GT Neo 5 prioritizes blazing-fast charging above all else. This comparison dissects their similarities and differences to determine which phone best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Realme GT Neo 5 240W is the more compelling choice. While both phones share the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, the Neo 5’s revolutionary 240W charging – fully charging in just 10 minutes – is a game-changer, significantly reducing downtime. The Ace 2 offers a solid experience, but can't match the Neo 5's charging prowess.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA 800 | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, February 07 | 2023, February 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, February 13 | Available. Released 2023, February 09 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Asahi Glass), aluminum frame, glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) | - |
| Dimensions | 163.4 x 74.3 x 8.7 mm (6.43 x 2.93 x 0.34 in) | 163.9 x 75.8 x 8.9 mm (6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 204 g (7.20 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| | - | Illuminated RGB (on the back) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Asahi Glass | - |
| Resolution | 1240 x 2772 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~451 ppi density) | 1240 x 2772 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~451 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.74 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~90.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.74 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~87.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+ | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1400 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 13, ColorOS 13 | Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 18GB RAM | 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, 25mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP, f/3.3, 20mm (microscope) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, 25mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (dual side) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 100W wired, 100% in 25 min | 240W wired, 50% in 4 min, 100% in 10 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | 4600 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Glacier Blue, Red | Purple, Black, White |
| Models | PHK110 | RMX3708 |
| Price | About 390 EUR | About 440 EUR |
OnePlus Ace 2
- Potentially more refined software experience (OnePlus OxygenOS)
- Balanced feature set
- Reliable Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 performance
- Significantly slower charging speed (100W vs 240W)
- May lack the aggressive performance tuning of the Realme GT Neo 5
Realme GT Neo 5 240W
- Revolutionary 240W charging – fastest in the market
- Aggressive performance tuning for gaming
- Potentially brighter display
- Realme UI may not appeal to all users
- Potential for more aggressive thermal throttling under sustained load
Display Comparison
Both devices utilize AMOLED panels, but specific details like resolution and refresh rate are missing from the provided data. However, given their market positioning, we can expect both to offer at least a 120Hz refresh rate for smooth scrolling and gaming. The Realme GT Neo 5 may have a slight edge in peak brightness, a common trend in Realme displays, potentially offering better visibility in direct sunlight. Bezels are likely comparable, focusing on maximizing screen real estate.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is limited. However, both brands typically employ capable main sensors in this price range. The absence of information regarding sensor size or OIS suggests a focus on computational photography. Image processing styles will likely differ – OnePlus tends towards more natural colors, while Realme often boosts saturation for a more vibrant look. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely a marketing tactic, offering minimal practical benefit.
Performance
The core of both phones is the Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) chipset, meaning CPU performance will be virtually identical. Both feature the same octa-core configuration (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2, 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710, and 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510). The real-world performance difference will hinge on thermal management and RAM optimization. While RAM speed isn't specified, both are likely to utilize LPDDR5X for fast data transfer. Sustained performance under heavy load will be crucial, and Realme's cooling solutions often prioritize aggressive performance over long-term thermal stability.
Battery Life
This is where the Realme GT Neo 5 240W truly shines. While battery capacity isn't specified, the 240W wired charging capability is a massive advantage, achieving 50% charge in just 4 minutes and 100% in 10 minutes. The OnePlus Ace 2’s 100W charging, while still fast (100% in 25 minutes), pales in comparison. The faster charging of the Neo 5 effectively mitigates any potential disadvantage from a slightly smaller battery capacity, offering more usable uptime for demanding users.
Buying Guide
Buy the OnePlus Ace 2 if you prioritize a more refined software experience and a slightly more balanced approach to features. It's ideal for users who value a consistent, reliable flagship without needing the absolute fastest charging. Buy the Realme GT Neo 5 240W if you are a power user who frequently finds themselves needing to quickly top up their battery, and you value speed and convenience above all else. It’s perfect for gamers, travelers, or anyone with a demanding mobile lifestyle.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the 240W charging of the Realme GT Neo 5 damage the battery over time?
Realme has implemented sophisticated battery management and safety protocols to mitigate the risks associated with ultra-fast charging. The phone monitors battery health and adjusts charging speed accordingly, preventing overheating and degradation. While long-term effects are still being studied, Realme claims minimal impact on battery lifespan.
❓ Does the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 in either phone struggle with thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is known to generate heat under sustained load. Both the OnePlus Ace 2 and Realme GT Neo 5 will likely experience some degree of thermal throttling. Realme often prioritizes peak performance, potentially leading to more aggressive throttling than the OnePlus, which may favor sustained performance over short bursts.
❓ Is the Realme GT Neo 5 240W compatible with standard USB-PD chargers?
No, the Realme GT Neo 5 240W requires its proprietary 240W charger to achieve its maximum charging speed. Using a standard USB-PD charger will result in significantly slower charging times, similar to the OnePlus Ace 2's 100W charging.
