OnePlus Ace 2 Pro vs Xiaomi 13T Pro: A Deep Dive into Flagship Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing peak performance and sustained gaming, the OnePlus Ace 2 Pro emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset offers a slight edge in CPU and GPU performance, coupled with potentially better thermal management. However, the Xiaomi 13T Pro counters with excellent battery life and a brighter display, making it a strong contender for everyday users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | OnePlus Ace 2 Pro | Xiaomi 13T Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, August 16 | 2023, September 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, August 23 | Available. Released 2023, September 26 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Asahi Glass), plastic frame, glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back or silicone polymer back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.1 x 74.2 x 9 mm (6.42 x 2.92 x 0.35 in) | 162.2 x 75.7 x 8.5 mm (6.39 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 210 g (7.41 oz) | 200 g or 206 g (7.05 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Asahi Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1240 x 2772 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~451 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.74 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 550 nits (typ), 1200 nits (HBM), 1600 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 144Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1200 nits (HBM), 2600 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-X3 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9200+ (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 740 | Immortalis-G715 MC11 |
| OS | Android 13, ColorOS 13.1 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 24GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Leica lens, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/1.9, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.88", 0.61µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 15mm (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 8K@24fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 4K/1080p@30fps HDR10+, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; 10-bit LOG, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, HDR10+ |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), GALILEO (E1+E5a), NavIC (L5), BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual/tri-band (market/region dependent), Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 150W wired | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 19 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Aurora Green, Titanium Gray | Alpine Blue, Meadow Green, Black |
| Models | PJA110 | 23078PND5G |
| Price | About 380 EUR | $ 370.00 / £ 482.55 / € 301.99 |
| SAR EU | - | 1.00 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
OnePlus Ace 2 Pro
- Superior CPU and GPU performance with Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
- Potentially better thermal management for sustained gaming
- Faster 150W wired charging
- Battery life likely inferior to Xiaomi 13T Pro
- Display brightness potentially lower than Xiaomi 13T Pro
Xiaomi 13T Pro
- Excellent battery life (11:50h active use)
- Brighter display (1094 nits)
- Fast 120W charging with PD3.0/QC4 support
- Dimensity 9200+ may exhibit more thermal throttling under sustained load
- CPU performance slightly behind Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi 13T Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1094 nits, compared to an unstated peak for the Ace 2 Pro. This translates to superior visibility under direct sunlight. While the Ace 2 Pro’s display technology isn’t specified, Xiaomi’s panel likely utilizes advanced color calibration techniques. Both devices likely employ high refresh rate panels, but the 13T Pro’s brightness advantage is a key differentiator for outdoor use and HDR content viewing.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specs are limited, but the focus should be on the main sensors and image processing. While both phones likely feature multi-camera systems, the quality of the primary sensor and the sophistication of the image processing algorithms will be crucial. Without specific sensor size information, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner. However, Xiaomi’s image processing is generally known for vibrant, saturated colors, while OnePlus tends towards a more natural look. The presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on the main sensor of both devices is expected, crucial for sharp photos and stable videos.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The OnePlus Ace 2 Pro utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm), featuring a 1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 prime core. The Xiaomi 13T Pro counters with the MediaTek Dimensity 9200+ (4nm), sporting a slightly faster 1x3.35 GHz Cortex-X3. However, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 generally exhibits superior sustained performance due to Qualcomm’s advancements in thermal management and efficiency. The Ace 2 Pro’s CPU configuration (1+2+2+3) is also optimized for a balance of performance and power efficiency, while the 13T Pro’s (1+3+4) may lean more towards multi-core workloads. Both phones utilize LPDDR5x RAM, ensuring fast memory access.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi 13T Pro demonstrates a clear advantage in battery endurance, achieving an active use score of 11:50h and an endurance rating of 102 hours. While the Ace 2 Pro’s battery capacity is unspecified, the 13T Pro’s performance suggests a larger battery or more efficient power management. Both devices support incredibly fast wired charging – 150W for the Ace 2 Pro and 120W for the 13T Pro, with the latter claiming a full charge in just 19 minutes. The 13T Pro also supports PD3.0 and QC4 standards, offering broader compatibility.
Buying Guide
Buy the OnePlus Ace 2 Pro if you demand the absolute fastest performance for demanding tasks like gaming, video editing, or running complex applications. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 is a powerhouse. Buy the Xiaomi 13T Pro if you prioritize all-day battery life, a vibrant and bright display for media consumption, and incredibly fast 120W charging, all while still enjoying flagship-level performance for most tasks.