OnePlus 9 vs Oppo Find X3 Pro: A Deep Dive into Two Snapdragon 888 Powerhouses
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the OnePlus 9 emerges as the slightly better value. Its brighter 821 nit display and marginally superior endurance rating (87h vs 81h) provide a more consistently enjoyable experience, while both phones offer identical processing power. However, the Oppo Find X3 Pro's faster wireless charging is a compelling advantage for those prioritizing convenience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | OnePlus 9 | Oppo Find X3 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - EU | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA - EU | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat20 2000/200 Mbps, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 3, 28, 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA - CN | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, March 23 | 2021, March 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, March 26 | Available. Released 2021, March 19 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 160 x 74.2 x 8.7 mm (EU/NA)160 x 73.9 x 8.1 mm (IN/CN) | 163.6 x 74 x 8.3 mm (6.44 x 2.91 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 192 g (EU/NA)183 g (IN/CN) (6.46 oz) | 193 g (6.81 oz) |
| IP68 (T-Mobile version only) | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) | 1440 x 3216 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~525 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~87.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Fluid AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1100 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, BT.2020, 500 nits (typ), 1300 nits (peak) |
| Always-on display | - | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, OxygenOS 13 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Hasselblad Color Calibration, color spectrum sensor, dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 52mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, 2x optical zoom, PDAF 50 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 110˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF 3 MP, f/3.0, (microscope), AF, ring flash, 60x magnification |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | - |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.43", 1.12µm, multi-directional PDAF 50 MP, f/2.2, 14mm (ultrawide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, AF 2 MP, f/2.4, (monochrome) | - |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, Auto HDR, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 65W wired, PD, 100% in 29 min 15W wireless (EU/NA) | 65W wired, PD, 40% in 10 min 30W wireless, 100% in 80 min 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Winter Mist, Arctic Sky, Astral Black | Gloss Black, Blue, White, Cosmic Mocha, Mars Edition, Photographer Edition |
| Models | LE2113, LE2111, LE2110, LE2117, LE2115 | CPH2173, PEEM00, OPG03 |
| Price | $ 145.00 / £ 200.00 / € 249.99 | About 200 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 87h | Endurance rating 81h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -24.5 LUFS (Very good) | -25.4 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 656467 (v8) GeekBench: 3316 (v5.1) GFXBench: 33fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
OnePlus 9
- Brighter display for outdoor visibility
- Slightly better battery endurance
- Faster wired charging (29 mins to 100%)
- Slower wireless charging (15W)
- No reverse wireless charging
Oppo Find X3 Pro
- Faster wireless charging (30W)
- Includes 10W reverse wireless charging
- Potentially more advanced camera processing
- Dimmer display compared to OnePlus 9
- Slightly lower battery endurance
Display Comparison
The OnePlus 9 boasts a peak brightness of 821 nits, noticeably exceeding the Oppo Find X3 Pro’s 774 nits. This difference translates to better visibility under direct sunlight. While both utilize high-refresh-rate panels (assumed, based on market positioning), the OnePlus 9’s higher peak brightness is a tangible advantage for outdoor use. The Oppo Find X3 Pro advertises an 'Infinite' contrast ratio, a typical marketing term for OLED panels, but doesn’t provide a measured value. The lack of specific PWM dimming rate data for either phone makes it difficult to assess suitability for users sensitive to flicker, but both are likely to employ sophisticated dimming techniques.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but the provided data lacks specifics beyond 'Photo / Video' capabilities. The absence of sensor size or megapixel counts prevents a detailed comparison. However, given Oppo’s reputation for camera innovation, the Find X3 Pro likely emphasizes computational photography and advanced image processing algorithms. The OnePlus 9, while capable, may lean towards a more natural color profile. The lack of information on OIS and lens apertures makes it impossible to assess low-light performance differences. It's safe to assume both phones offer a versatile camera experience, but deeper analysis requires more detailed specifications.
Performance
Both the OnePlus 9 and Oppo Find X3 Pro are equipped with the Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) chipset, featuring an octa-core CPU configuration identical in clock speeds (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1, 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78, 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55). Therefore, raw processing power is virtually indistinguishable. Thermal management, however, could differ based on cooling solutions and software optimization. While not specified in the provided data, OnePlus historically prioritizes sustained performance, potentially leading to less aggressive throttling under prolonged load. Both phones likely utilize LPDDR5 RAM, though the speed isn't specified, contributing to fast app loading and multitasking.
Battery Life
The OnePlus 9 offers an endurance rating of 87 hours, slightly surpassing the Oppo Find X3 Pro’s 81 hours. This suggests the OnePlus 9 manages power consumption more efficiently, despite the similar chipset. Both support 65W wired charging, achieving a full charge in 29 minutes for the OnePlus 9. However, the Oppo Find X3 Pro excels in wireless charging, reaching 100% in 80 minutes with 30W, compared to the OnePlus 9’s 15W wireless charging (EU/NA) which is significantly slower. The Oppo Find X3 Pro also includes 10W reverse wireless charging, a feature absent on the OnePlus 9, allowing it to charge accessories like earbuds.
Buying Guide
Buy the OnePlus 9 if you prioritize a brighter, more visible display in outdoor conditions and value slightly longer battery life. It’s the ideal choice for users who consume a lot of media on the go. Buy the Oppo Find X3 Pro if you frequently utilize wireless charging and appreciate the convenience of reaching 100% in 80 minutes, and if you value the inclusion of 10W reverse wireless charging.