OnePlus 9 Pro vs. Google Pixel 7 Pro: A Head-to-Head Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Google Pixel 7 Pro emerges as the superior choice. While the OnePlus 9 Pro boasts faster charging, the Pixel 7 Pro’s significantly brighter display, advanced camera system, and Google’s software support outweigh this advantage. The Tensor G2 also provides a unique, AI-driven experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | OnePlus 9 Pro | Google Pixel 7 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - EU | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71 - GE2AE |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA - EU | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78, 257, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - GE2AE |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat20 2000/200 Mbps, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 3, 28, 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA - CN | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 75, 76, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GP4BC | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, March 23 | 2022, October 06 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, March 30 | Available. Released 2022, October 13 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.2 x 73.6 x 8.7 mm (6.43 x 2.90 x 0.34 in) | 162.9 x 76.6 x 8.9 mm (6.41 x 3.02 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 197 g (6.95 oz) | 212 g (7.48 oz) |
| IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3216 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~525 ppi density) | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~512 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 110.6 cm2 (~88.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO Fluid2 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM), 1500 nits (peak) |
| Always-on display | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55 | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, OxygenOS 14 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Hasselblad Color Calibration, dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.43", 1.12µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.4, 77mm (telephoto), 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3.3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.2, 14mm (ultrawide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, AF 2 MP, f/2.4, (monochrome) | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 10.8 MP, f/2.2, 21mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.22µm |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, 25mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/3.5, 120mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.55", 0.7µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 126˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.9", 1.25µm, AF |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, Auto HDR, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS, 10-bit HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 10.8 MP, f/2.2, 21mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.22µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| - | Ultra Wideband (UWB) support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 65W wired, PD, 100% in 29 min 50W wireless, 100% in 43 min 5W reverse wireless | 23W wired, PD3.0, 50% in 30 min 23W wireless Reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Morning Mist, Forest Green, Stellar Black | Obsidian, Snow, Hazel |
| Models | LE2121, LE2125, LE2123, LE2120, LE2127 | GP4BC, GE2AE, GFE4J |
| Price | € 246.17 / $ 264.95 / £ 287.00 | € 248.84 / $ 204.00 / £ 259.99 / ₹ 36,999 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 86h | Endurance rating 83h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -24.1 LUFS (Very good) | -24.8 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 796369 (v9) GeekBench: 3187 (v5.1) GFXBench: 34fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
OnePlus 9 Pro
- Incredibly fast 65W wired charging
- Fast 50W wireless charging
- Competitive price point (now lower)
- Snapdragon 888 can throttle under heavy load
- Camera lacks the software sophistication of the Pixel 7 Pro
Google Pixel 7 Pro
- Brighter and more vibrant display
- Superior camera system with advanced image processing
- Google Tensor G2 offers unique AI-powered features
- Guaranteed software updates directly from Google
- Significantly slower charging speeds
- Higher price point
Display Comparison
The Pixel 7 Pro’s display is a clear winner in terms of raw specifications. Its measured peak brightness of 1090 nits significantly surpasses the OnePlus 9 Pro’s 859 nits, resulting in better visibility under direct sunlight. While both utilize LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates, the Pixel 7 Pro’s infinite contrast ratio (nominal) contributes to deeper blacks and a more immersive viewing experience. The OnePlus 9 Pro’s display is still excellent, but the Pixel 7 Pro offers a noticeable upgrade for media consumption and outdoor use.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 7 Pro’s camera system is a substantial upgrade over the OnePlus 9 Pro. While both phones are capable of capturing excellent photos and videos, Google’s computational photography prowess shines through. The Pixel 7 Pro benefits from Google’s advanced image processing algorithms, resulting in superior dynamic range, detail, and low-light performance. While specific sensor sizes aren’t provided, the Pixel 7 Pro’s image processing consistently delivers more natural-looking and visually appealing results. The OnePlus 9 Pro’s camera is still very good, but it lacks the software sophistication of the Pixel 7 Pro.
Performance
Both phones employ an octa-core CPU configuration, but the underlying chipsets differ significantly. The OnePlus 9 Pro features the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G (5nm), while the Pixel 7 Pro utilizes Google’s in-house Tensor G2 (5nm). The Pixel 7 Pro’s CPU has a slightly higher clock speed on its prime core (2.85 GHz vs 2.84 GHz), but the real difference lies in the Tensor G2’s focus on AI and machine learning tasks. This translates to faster image processing, improved voice recognition, and unique features like Magic Eraser. While the Snapdragon 888 is still a capable performer, it’s known to throttle under sustained load, a potential issue for heavy gamers. The Tensor G2’s thermal management is generally more efficient, though not necessarily offering peak GPU performance comparable to the latest Snapdragon chips.
Battery Life
Battery endurance is relatively close, with the OnePlus 9 Pro achieving an 86-hour rating and the Pixel 7 Pro scoring 83 hours. However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The OnePlus 9 Pro supports a blazing-fast 65W wired charging, reaching 100% in just 29 minutes, and 50W wireless charging (43 minutes). The Pixel 7 Pro, in contrast, is limited to 23W wired charging (50% in 30 minutes) and 23W wireless charging. This means the OnePlus 9 Pro is significantly faster to charge, a crucial advantage for users who frequently need to top up their battery. However, the Pixel 7 Pro’s software optimizations and efficient chipset help mitigate the impact of the smaller charging wattage.
Buying Guide
Buy the OnePlus 9 Pro if you prioritize incredibly fast wired and wireless charging and are comfortable with a slightly older chipset. It’s an excellent value for users who frequently top up their phones and don’t need the absolute latest in software features. Buy the Google Pixel 7 Pro if you value a superior camera experience, a brighter and more vibrant display, and guaranteed software updates directly from Google, alongside the unique features enabled by the Tensor G2.