OnePlus 8 vs Oppo Find X2 Pro: A Deep Dive into Battery, Charging, and Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing longevity and rapid replenishment, the Oppo Find X2 Pro emerges as the winner. Its significantly faster 65W charging, despite a slightly lower endurance rating, provides a more convenient experience. However, the OnePlus 8 remains a strong contender for those valuing a more established software experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | OnePlus 8 | Oppo Find X2 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 66 - EU | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 7, 28, 78 SA/NSA - EU | 1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G 7.5 Gbps DL | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA - CN | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, April 14 | 2020, March 06 |
| Status | Available. Released 2020, April 21 | Available. Released 2020, March 06 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), ceramic back or leather back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 160.2 x 72.9 x 8 mm (6.31 x 2.87 x 0.31 in) | 165.2 x 74.4 x 8.8 mm (Ceramic) / 9.5mm (Leather) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 180 g (6.35 oz) | 217 g (Ceramic) / 200 g (Leather) (7.05 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 mins) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) | 1440 x 3168 pixels (~513 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~88.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 111.7 cm2 (~90.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Fluid AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 10, upgradable to Android 13, OxygenOS 13 | Android 10, ColorOS 7.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.0, 2-LANE | UFS 3.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 16 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 116˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.6", 1.0µm 2 MP (macro) | 48 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/1.43", 1.12µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/3.0, 129mm (periscope telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, 5x optical zoom, PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/2.2, 17mm (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, Auto HDR, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS; HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired, 50% in 22 min | 65W wired, PD, 100% in 38 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4300 mAh | Li-Po 4260 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Onyx Black, Glacial Green, Interstellar Glow, Polar Silver | Black, Orange, Gray, Green, Lamborghini Edition |
| Models | IN2013, IN2017, IN2010, IN2019, IN2011 | CPH2025, PDEM30, OPG01 |
| Price | About 840 EUR | About 300 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 108h | Endurance rating 88h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -22.5 LUFS (Excellent) | -25.2 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 564708 (v8) GeekBench: 13291 (v4.4), 3399 (v5.1) GFXBench: 46fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 593717 (v8) GeekBench: 13245 (v4.4), 3269 (v5.1) GFXBench: 25fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
OnePlus 8
- Longer battery endurance rating (108h)
- Established OxygenOS software experience
- Potentially more affordable (depending on market)
- Slower charging speed (30W)
- Lower peak display brightness (803 nits)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
- Significantly faster 65W charging (full charge in 38 min)
- Higher peak display brightness (871 nits)
- Potentially superior camera system (based on brand history)
- Shorter battery endurance rating (88h)
- ColorOS software may not appeal to all users
Display Comparison
Both the OnePlus 8 and Oppo Find X2 Pro feature excellent displays with an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, indicating deep blacks. However, the Oppo Find X2 Pro boasts a higher peak brightness of 871 nits compared to the OnePlus 8’s 803 nits. This translates to better visibility under direct sunlight. While both utilize high refresh rate panels (not specified in the data, but standard for this class), the Oppo’s brighter display provides a more vibrant viewing experience. The lack of information on panel technology (e.g., LTPO) prevents a deeper analysis of power efficiency.
Camera Comparison
The provided data only indicates both phones have 'Photo / Video' capabilities, offering no insight into sensor size, aperture, or image processing. Given Oppo’s historical focus on camera innovation, it’s reasonable to assume the Find X2 Pro likely features a more advanced camera system, potentially with larger sensors and more sophisticated algorithms. Without specific details, a definitive camera comparison is impossible, but Oppo’s brand positioning suggests a potential advantage in image quality.
Performance
Both devices are equipped with the Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+), featuring the same Octa-core CPU configuration. This means raw processing power will be virtually identical for everyday tasks and demanding applications. The performance difference will likely come down to thermal management and software optimization, areas not covered by the provided data. However, the identical chipset and CPU configuration suggest comparable gaming performance and app loading speeds.
Battery Life
The OnePlus 8 achieves an endurance rating of 108 hours, while the Oppo Find X2 Pro manages 88 hours. This suggests the OnePlus 8 offers slightly better battery life under typical usage. However, the Oppo Find X2 Pro compensates with significantly faster 65W wired charging, achieving a full charge in 38 minutes, compared to the OnePlus 8’s 30W charging which takes 22 minutes to reach 50%. This difference in charging speed dramatically alters the user experience, minimizing downtime and offering greater convenience.
Buying Guide
Buy the OnePlus 8 if you need a phone with a well-established, customizable software experience (OxygenOS) and prioritize a slightly longer overall battery endurance rating, even if charging is slower. Buy the Oppo Find X2 Pro if you prefer blazing-fast 65W charging, allowing you to quickly top up your battery, and are comfortable with ColorOS, which offers a different aesthetic and feature set.