OnePlus 7 Pro vs Oppo Reno 5G: A Deep Dive into 2019 Flagship Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing longevity and a brighter display, the OnePlus 7 Pro emerges as the stronger choice. Its 85-hour endurance rating, coupled with a measured 616 nits of brightness, provides a more robust and visually pleasing experience than the Oppo Reno 5G, despite the latter's slightly faster charging.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | OnePlus 7 Pro | Oppo Reno 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - Global | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - Global |
| 5G bands | - | 78 NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat18 1200/150 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G (2+ Gbps DL) |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 32, 34, 38, 39, 41, 46, 48, 66, 71 - North America | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019, May 14. Released 2019, May 16 | 2019, April. Released 2019, May |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 162.6 x 75.9 x 8.8 mm (6.40 x 2.99 x 0.35 in) | 162 x 77.2 x 9.3 mm (6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 206 g (7.27 oz) | 215 g (7.58 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~516 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~387 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 108.8 cm2 (~88.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 108.6 cm2 (~86.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Fluid AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ | AMOLED |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 640 | Adreno 640 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 12, OxygenOS 12.1 | Android 9.0 (Pie), ColorOS 6 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 3.0 | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.6, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.4, 78mm (telephoto), 3x optical zoom, PDAF, OIS 16 MP, f/2.2, 17mm (ultrawide), AF | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/3.0, 130mm (periscope telephoto), 5x optical zoom, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm (ultrawide) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, 720p@480fps, Auto HDR, gyro-EIS, no video rec. with ultrawide camera | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, gyro-EIS; video rec. only with main camera |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | LED flash, HDR |
| Single | Motorized pop-up 16 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | Motorized pop-up 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, EDR, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Virtual proximity sensing | - | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired | 20W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4065 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Mirror Grey, Almond, Nebula Blue | Ocean Green, Jet Black |
| Models | GM1911, GM1913, GM1917, GM1910, GM1915 | CPH1921 |
| Price | About 590 EUR | About 880 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Audio quality | Noise -93.0dB / Crosstalk -89.6dB | - |
| Battery life | Endurance rating 85h | - |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Loudspeaker | -23.9 LUFS (Very good) | - |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 364025 (v7) GeekBench: 10943 (v4.4), 2721 (v5.1) GFXBench: 19fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
OnePlus 7 Pro
- Superior battery life (85h endurance)
- Brighter display (616 nits)
- Faster 30W wired charging
- Camera specs are undefined
- May be harder to find in pristine condition due to age
Oppo Reno 5G
- Slightly faster charging (20W vs 30W)
- Potentially more readily available
- Similar Snapdragon 855 performance
- Lower battery endurance
- Display brightness is unknown and likely lower
- Camera specs are undefined
Display Comparison
The OnePlus 7 Pro boasts a 616-nit peak brightness, a figure not provided for the Reno 5G, suggesting a potentially more visible screen in direct sunlight. Both utilize AMOLED technology, but the OnePlus 7 Pro’s higher brightness translates to better HDR content viewing. While both likely feature similar color accuracy, the OnePlus 7 Pro’s brightness advantage is a tangible benefit for outdoor use and overall visual pop. The Reno 5G’s display specs are less defined, making a direct comparison difficult, but the OnePlus 7 Pro clearly holds an advantage in measured brightness.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature a 'Photo / Video' camera setup, but detailed sensor information is absent. Without knowing sensor sizes, apertures, or OIS implementation, a definitive camera comparison is impossible. The absence of details suggests neither phone prioritizes a groundbreaking camera experience. It’s reasonable to assume both rely heavily on software processing to enhance image quality. The lack of information regarding the Reno 5G’s camera system makes it difficult to assess its capabilities relative to the OnePlus 7 Pro.
Performance
Both the OnePlus 7 Pro and Oppo Reno 5G are powered by the Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7 nm) chipset, featuring an identical octa-core CPU configuration. This means raw processing power will be nearly indistinguishable between the two devices in most tasks. However, thermal management, which isn’t specified, could differentiate performance during sustained loads. The lack of LPDDR5x RAM specifications for either device means we can’t assess memory bandwidth differences. Therefore, performance will largely depend on software optimization and cooling solutions, areas where OnePlus historically has a slight edge.
Battery Life
The OnePlus 7 Pro’s endurance rating of 85 hours significantly surpasses what’s available for the Oppo Reno 5G. This suggests a more efficient power management system or a larger battery capacity (not specified). While the Oppo Reno 5G offers 20W wired charging, compared to the OnePlus 7 Pro’s 30W, the difference in charging speed is less impactful than the substantial difference in overall battery life. The OnePlus 7 Pro’s longer endurance means fewer charging cycles are needed, potentially extending battery health over the long term.
Buying Guide
Buy the OnePlus 7 Pro if you need exceptional battery life for all-day use and value a vibrant, bright display for outdoor visibility. It’s ideal for power users and media consumers. Buy the Oppo Reno 5G if you prioritize a slightly faster charging experience and are comfortable with potentially shorter battery runtimes. It’s a good option for users who frequently top up their phones throughout the day.