OnePlus 13T vs. Oppo Find X7 Ultra: A Deep Dive into Flagship Performance and Battery Life
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing peak performance and cutting-edge CPU architecture, the OnePlus 13T is the clear winner. However, the Oppo Find X7 Ultra delivers superior battery life, faster charging, and a more holistic flagship experience, making it the better choice for everyday users who value longevity and convenience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | OnePlus 13T | Oppo Find X7 Ultra |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78, 80, 81, 83, 84, 89 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, April 24 | 2024, January 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, April 30 | Available. Released 2024, January 12 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum alloy frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Gorilla Glass) or eco leather back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 150.8 x 71.7 x 8.2 mm (5.94 x 2.82 x 0.32 in) | 164.3 x 76.2 x 9.5 mm (6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time)· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 185 g (6.53 oz) | 221 g (7.80 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Crystal Shield Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Resolution | 1216 x 2640 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~460 ppi density) | 1440 x 3168 pixels (~510 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.32 inches, 97.9 cm2 (~90.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.82 inches, 113.0 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 2160Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, HDR Vivid, 1600 nits (HBM) | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1600 nits (typ), 2600 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x4.32 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix L + 6x3.53 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix M) | Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm) | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 830 | Adreno 750 |
| OS | Android 15, OxygenOS 15 (International), ColorOS 15 (China) | Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, (telephoto), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, 2x optical zoom, PDAF | - |
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Hasselblad Color Calibration, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.6, 65mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, 2.8x optical zoom, multi-directional PDAF (25cm - ∞), OIS 50 MP, f/4.3, 135mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.51", 0.7µm, 6x optical zoom, dual pixel PDAF (35cm - ∞), OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 14mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.95", 1.0µm, PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, gyro-EIS, OIS, Dolby Vision HDR | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video, Dolby Vision |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | Panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, PDAF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual or tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 33W PPS, 18W PD, 18W QC 5W reverse wired | 100W wired, PD, 50% in 10 min, 100% in 26 min 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 6260 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Gray, Pink | Black, Dark Blue, Light Brown |
| Models | PKX110 | PHY110, PHY120 |
| Price | About 410 EUR | $ 546.64 |
OnePlus 13T
- Potentially faster CPU performance with Snapdragon 8 Elite and Oryon cores
- Cutting-edge chipset technology
- 80W fast charging offers quick top-ups
- Battery life likely shorter than Oppo Find X7 Ultra
- Charging speeds slower than Oppo Find X7 Ultra
- Camera specs currently unknown
Oppo Find X7 Ultra
- Excellent battery life (12:47h active use)
- Faster 100W wired and 50W wireless charging
- High display brightness (1165 nits)
- Chipset is a generation older (Snapdragon 8 Gen 3)
- CPU performance may be slightly lower than Snapdragon 8 Elite
- May prioritize image processing over raw sensor size
Display Comparison
The Oppo Find X7 Ultra edges out the OnePlus 13T in display brightness, achieving a measured peak of 1165 nits. While the 13T’s display specs are not provided, the X7 Ultra’s high brightness ensures excellent visibility in direct sunlight. Both devices likely employ LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates, conserving battery life, but the X7 Ultra’s superior peak brightness is a tangible advantage for outdoor use. Color accuracy and panel technology (AMOLED is assumed for both) are likely comparable, but the X7 Ultra’s brightness is a key differentiator.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for the OnePlus 13T, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Oppo Find X7 Ultra is expected to feature a sophisticated camera system, likely with a large main sensor and advanced image processing. The X7 Ultra’s focus on image quality and computational photography is a hallmark of Oppo’s Ultra series. While the 13T may offer competitive camera performance, the X7 Ultra’s established reputation and potential for superior image stabilization (OIS) and low-light performance give it an edge. We can assume both phones will have multiple lenses, but the X7 Ultra is likely to prioritize image quality over quantity.
Performance
The OnePlus 13T’s Snapdragon 8 Elite, featuring Oryon V2 Phoenix cores, represents a significant leap in CPU performance. The 4.32 GHz Oryon cores promise faster single-core speeds compared to the Oppo Find X7 Ultra’s 3.3 GHz Cortex-X4. While the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 in the X7 Ultra is still incredibly powerful, the 3nm process and Oryon architecture of the 8 Elite give the 13T a theoretical advantage in CPU-intensive tasks. However, the Gen 3’s Adreno GPU is a proven performer, and real-world gaming performance will depend on optimization. The 13T’s LPDDR5x RAM speed is not specified, but is likely comparable to the X7 Ultra, minimizing memory-related bottlenecks.
Battery Life
The Oppo Find X7 Ultra demonstrates a clear advantage in battery endurance, achieving an active use score of 12 hours and 47 minutes. While the OnePlus 13T’s battery capacity is unknown, the X7 Ultra’s longer runtime is significant. Furthermore, the X7 Ultra’s 100W wired charging (0-100% in 26 minutes) and 50W wireless charging are substantially faster than the 13T’s 80W wired, 33W PPS, and 18W PD/QC options. The X7 Ultra’s faster charging speeds minimize downtime, while the 50W wireless charging provides added convenience. The 13T’s 5W reverse wired charging is also slower than the X7 Ultra’s 10W reverse wireless.
Buying Guide
Buy the OnePlus 13T if you are a power user demanding the absolute fastest processing speeds for gaming, video editing, or demanding applications, and are comfortable with potentially shorter battery life. Buy the Oppo Find X7 Ultra if you prioritize all-day battery life, incredibly fast charging (including wireless), and a well-rounded flagship experience without sacrificing performance, even if it means a slightly older chipset.