OnePlus 11 vs Oppo Find X6 Pro: A Deep Dive into Two Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 Powerhouses
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Oppo Find X6 Pro emerges as the superior device. Its significantly brighter display (1318 nits vs 767 nits) and slightly longer battery endurance (114h vs 108h) justify the price premium. However, the OnePlus 11 remains a compelling option for those prioritizing value and faster US-market charging.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | OnePlus 11 | Oppo Find X6 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 32, 38, 39, 41, 40, 46, 48, 66, 71 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, January 04 | 2023, March 21 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, January 09 | Available. Released 2023, March 24 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) or eco leather back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.1 x 74.1 x 8.5 mm (6.42 x 2.92 x 0.33 in) | 164.8 x 76.2 x 9.1 mm or 9.5 mm |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 205 g (7.23 oz) | 216 g or 218 g (7.62 oz) |
| IP64 | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3216 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~525 ppi density) | 1440 x 3168 pixels (~510 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.82 inches, 113.0 cm2 (~90.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO3 Fluid AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) | LTPO3 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 800 nits (typ), 1500 nits (HBM), 2500 nits (peak) |
| Always-on display | - | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 740 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, OxygenOS 15 (International), ColorOS 14 (China) | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 - 128GB only UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Hasselblad Color Calibration, color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Hasselblad Color Calibration, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, 25mm (wide), 1.0µm | - |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 32 MP, f/2.0, 48mm (telephoto), 1/2.74", PDAF, 2x optical zoom 48 MP, f/2.2, 115˚, (ultrawide), 1/2.0", AF | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.6, 65mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, 2.8x optical zoom, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 110˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF |
| Video | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, Auto HDR, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video, Dolby Vision |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | Panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, 25mm (wide), 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, PDAF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 100W wired, PD, 50% in 10 min, 100% in 25 min - International 80W wired, PD - USA | 100W wired, PD, 45% in 10 min, 100% in 30 min 50W wireless, 50% in 22 min, 100% in 51 min 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Titan Black, Eternal Green, Jupiter Rock | Black, Green, Brown |
| Models | PHB110, CPH2449, CPH2447, CPH2451 | PGEM110, PGEM10 |
| Price | $ 379.99 / ₹ 33,990 | About 820 EUR |
| SAR | 1.19 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 108h | Endurance rating 114h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -25.2 LUFS (Very good) | -25.1 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 1140661 (v9) GeekBench: 4899 (v5.1) GFXBench: 57fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 1294797 (v9) GeekBench: 4791 (v5.1), 5226 (v6) GFXBench: 60fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
OnePlus 11
- Faster wired charging (International version)
- More affordable price point
- Clean and streamlined OxygenOS software
- Significantly dimmer display
- Lacks wireless charging
- Shorter battery endurance
Oppo Find X6 Pro
- Much brighter display for outdoor visibility
- Wireless and reverse wireless charging
- Slightly longer battery life
- Higher price tag
- Slower 10-minute charging speed
- Potentially more aggressive image processing
Display Comparison
The Oppo Find X6 Pro boasts a substantially brighter display, reaching a measured 1318 nits compared to the OnePlus 11’s 767 nits. This difference is immediately noticeable in direct sunlight, making the Find X6 Pro far more usable outdoors. Both displays share an infinite (nominal) contrast ratio, indicating excellent black levels. While both likely utilize LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates (not explicitly stated, but standard for this class), the Find X6 Pro’s higher peak brightness provides a clear advantage for HDR content consumption and overall visibility.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but detailed sensor information is lacking. The focus should be on image processing differences. While both are listed as capable of Photo/Video, the Oppo Find X6 Pro’s likely benefits from Oppo’s advanced computational photography algorithms, potentially resulting in more vibrant and detailed images, especially in challenging lighting conditions. The absence of specific sensor details makes a definitive comparison difficult, but Oppo’s history suggests a stronger emphasis on camera innovation.
Performance
Both devices are equipped with the Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) chipset, featuring the same Octa-core CPU configuration. This means raw processing power will be virtually identical for tasks like app launching, multitasking, and demanding games. The 4nm process node ensures excellent thermal efficiency, minimizing throttling during sustained workloads. However, the OnePlus 11’s cooling solution and software optimization could potentially lead to slightly more sustained performance, though this requires independent testing. RAM speed (likely LPDDR5x on both) isn’t specified, but is unlikely to be a differentiating factor.
Battery Life
The Oppo Find X6 Pro edges out the OnePlus 11 in battery endurance, achieving a rating of 114 hours versus 108 hours. This translates to slightly longer real-world usage between charges. Both support 100W wired charging, but the implementation differs. The Find X6 Pro takes 30 minutes for a full charge, while the OnePlus 11 manages it in 25 minutes (international version, 80W in the USA). The Find X6 Pro also adds 50W wireless charging (full charge in 51 minutes) and 10W reverse wireless charging, features absent on the OnePlus 11. The Find X6 Pro’s 45% charge in 10 minutes is slower than the OnePlus 11’s 50% in the same timeframe, but the overall charging ecosystem is more versatile.
Buying Guide
Buy the OnePlus 11 if you need a flagship experience without breaking the bank, and if you reside in the USA where it benefits from faster 80W charging. It’s ideal for users who prioritize a smooth, responsive experience for everyday tasks and gaming. Buy the Oppo Find X6 Pro if you demand the best possible display quality, fastest charging speeds (including wireless), and are willing to pay a premium for top-tier features and a slightly longer-lasting battery.