OnePlus 10R vs Xiaomi Poco F4 GT: A Deep Dive into Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and efficient charging, the Xiaomi Poco F4 GT emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, coupled with 120W charging, delivers a noticeable edge in demanding tasks and quicker top-ups, despite potential thermal concerns. However, the OnePlus 10R remains a strong contender for those valuing efficiency.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | OnePlus 10R | Xiaomi Poco F4 GT |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (4CA), Cat12 600/150 Mbps, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, April 28 | 2022, April 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, May 04 | Available. Released 2022, April 28 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.3 x 75.5 x 8.2 mm (6.43 x 2.97 x 0.32 in) | 162.5 x 76.7 x 8.5 mm (6.40 x 3.02 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 210 g (7.41 oz) |
| - | Physical magnetic pop-up gaming triggers | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~87.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Fluid AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+ | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8100 Max (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, OxygenOS 13 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, HyperOS 2 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 20 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 20 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps, HDR |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio Tuned by JBL | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 100% in 32 min | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 17 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4700 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Sierra Black, Forest Green, Prime Blue | Stealth Black, Knight Silver, Cyber Yellow |
| Models | CPH2411 | 21121210G |
| Price | ₹ 34,999 | € 227.11 / £ 339.99 |
| SAR | 0.95 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) | 1.09 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.59 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 81h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -27.4 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 952124 (v9) GeekBench: 3637 (v5.1) |
OnePlus 10R
- More efficient chipset (Dimensity 8100 Max)
- Potentially better thermal management
- Balanced performance and battery life
- Slower charging speed (80W)
- Less powerful CPU compared to Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
- Camera specs are unknown
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
- Faster charging (120W, 17 minutes to full)
- More powerful CPU (Snapdragon 8 Gen 1)
- Potentially better gaming performance
- Potential for thermal throttling
- Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 can be less power efficient
- Camera specs are unknown
Display Comparison
Both devices feature displays with an 'Infinite' contrast ratio, suggesting excellent black levels. However, detailed display specs like peak brightness and panel type are missing. Given the Poco F4 GT’s gaming focus, it likely prioritizes a higher refresh rate and potentially better color accuracy, though this remains unconfirmed. The absence of LTPO technology in either device suggests less dynamic refresh rate scaling for power saving compared to flagship models.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, offering minimal insight. Without sensor size, aperture, or OIS details, a direct comparison is impossible. However, given the Poco F4 GT’s overall focus on performance, it’s reasonable to assume a more capable camera system geared towards capturing fast-action shots. The prevalence of 2MP macro lenses in this price bracket suggests both phones may include one, but its utility is questionable.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco F4 GT’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4nm) boasts a Cortex-X2 prime core clocked at 3.00 GHz, promising superior single-core performance compared to the OnePlus 10R’s Dimensity 8100 Max. The Snapdragon’s architecture (1x Cortex-X2, 3x Cortex-A710, 4x Cortex-A510) is designed for peak performance, while the Dimensity 8100 Max (4x Cortex-A78, 4x Cortex-A55) focuses on a balance of power and efficiency. While the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 is more powerful on paper, its 4nm process can lead to thermal throttling under sustained load, a potential advantage for the 5nm Dimensity 8100 Max. Both phones likely utilize LPDDR5 RAM, but the speed isn't specified.
Battery Life
Both devices share an endurance rating of 81 hours, indicating similar real-world battery life despite differing charging speeds. The Poco F4 GT’s 120W charging is significantly faster than the OnePlus 10R’s 80W, achieving a full charge in just 17 minutes versus 32 minutes. This rapid charging is a major advantage for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly. While the 10R’s 80W is still fast, the F4 GT’s charging speed is a game-changer.
Buying Guide
Buy the OnePlus 10R if you need a phone that balances performance with excellent battery life and efficient charging, and prefer a more refined software experience. It’s ideal for everyday users and mobile gamers who don’t necessarily need the absolute peak performance. Buy the Xiaomi Poco F4 GT if you prioritize raw power for gaming and demanding applications, and value the fastest possible charging speeds. This phone is geared towards enthusiasts who are willing to manage potential thermal throttling for maximum performance.