The O2 XDA Neo represents a fascinating throwback to the early days of Windows Mobile, while the Xiaomi Poco F5 embodies the cutting-edge of modern Android. This comparison isn't just about specs; it's about contrasting eras of mobile technology and determining which device offers the most utility in today's landscape.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the vast majority of users, the Xiaomi Poco F5 is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 chipset, vibrant 963-nit display, and impressive 11:52h active use battery life deliver a modern smartphone experience the XDA Neo simply cannot match. The XDA Neo appeals to a niche collector's market.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | - | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| EDGE | Class 10 | - |
| GPRS | Class 10 | - |
| Speed | - | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2006, February | 2023, May 09 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2023, May |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 108.8 x 59.3 x 18.4 mm (4.28 x 2.33 x 0.72 in) | 161.1 x 75 x 7.9 mm (6.34 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Mini-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 150 g (5.29 oz) | 181 g (6.38 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 240 x 320 pixels, 4:3 ratio (~143 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 2.8 inches, 42 x 57 mm, 24.3 cm2 (~37.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TFT resistive touchscreen, 65K colors | AMOLED, 68B colors, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 120Hz, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (peak) |
| | Handwriting recognition | - |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | 200 MHz ARM926EJ-S | Octa-core (1x2.91 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.49 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | TI OMAP 850 | Qualcomm SM7475-AB Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | - | Adreno 725 |
| OS | Microsoft Windows Mobile 5.0 PocketPC | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | SD/MMC | No |
| Internal | 64MB RAM, 128MB ROM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | - | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 2 MP | - |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | CIF | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | - | 1080p@30/60fps |
| | No | - |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Alert types | Vibration; Downloadable polyphonic ringtones | - |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 2.0 | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | - | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | No | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | miniUSB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11b/g | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Browser | WAP 2.0/xHTML, HTML (PocketIE) | - |
| Sensors | - | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| | Pocket Office
Voice memo
MP3/AAC player | - |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 46 min |
| Stand-by | Up to 200 h | - |
| Talk time | Up to 5 h | - |
| Type | Removable Li-Ion 1200 mAh battery | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Stylish black | Black, Blue, White |
| Models | - | 23049PCD8G, 23049PCD8I |
| Price | About 300 EUR | € 202.76 / $ 289.99 / ₹ 23,790 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 118h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-24.3 LUFS (Very good)
|
O2 XDA Neo
- Nostalgic appeal for collectors
- Unique Windows Mobile experience
- Compact form factor (likely)
- Extremely outdated hardware
- Poor performance by modern standards
- Limited app availability
- Short battery life (estimated)
Xiaomi Poco F5
- Powerful Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 processor
- Bright and vibrant display
- Excellent battery life and fast charging
- Modern Android operating system
- May lack expandable storage
- Camera isn't top-of-the-line
Display Comparison
The Poco F5 boasts a significantly more advanced display, reaching a measured peak brightness of 963 nits, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. The XDA Neo's display specifications are unavailable, but given its age, it's safe to assume it lacks the color accuracy, brightness, and resolution of the Poco F5's panel. The Poco F5's 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio suggests a modern IPS or AMOLED panel, offering deeper blacks and more vivid colors compared to the likely TFT-LCD of the XDA Neo.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but the specifics are limited. The XDA Neo's camera technology is dated, likely offering low resolution and limited features. The Poco F5, while not a flagship camera phone, benefits from modern image processing and sensor technology. Without specific sensor details, it's reasonable to assume the Poco F5's camera will produce sharper, more detailed images with better dynamic range, especially in challenging lighting conditions. The XDA Neo's camera is likely a novelty, while the Poco F5's is a functional component of a modern smartphone.
Performance
The performance gap is immense. The O2 XDA Neo's TI OMAP 850 with a 200 MHz ARM926EJ-S CPU is dwarfed by the Xiaomi Poco F5's Qualcomm SM7475-AB Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2. The Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, built on a 4nm process, features an octa-core configuration (1x2.91 GHz Cortex-X2, 3x2.49 GHz Cortex-A710, and 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510), delivering a level of processing power and efficiency the XDA Neo can't approach. This translates to significantly faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and the ability to run demanding games on the Poco F5.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi Poco F5 excels in battery life, achieving an active use score of 11:52h and an endurance rating of 118h. Its 67W wired charging, supporting PD3.0 and QC4, allows for a full charge in just 46 minutes. The O2 XDA Neo's battery capacity and charging capabilities are unknown, but given its age and technology, it's highly probable that it offers significantly shorter battery life and slower charging speeds. The Poco F5's fast charging is a crucial convenience feature absent in the XDA Neo.
Buying Guide
Buy the O2 XDA Neo if you're a collector of vintage technology, fascinated by the history of mobile computing, or specifically require a device running Windows Mobile for legacy applications. Buy the Xiaomi Poco F5 if you prioritize performance, battery life, a modern user interface, and a vibrant display for everyday tasks, gaming, and photography.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the O2 XDA Neo compatible with modern mobile networks (4G/5G)?
No. The O2 XDA Neo predates 4G and 5G technology. It is limited to 2G and 3G connectivity, which may not be fully supported in some regions. Using it for voice calls or data may be unreliable or impossible in many areas.
❓ Can I install modern Android apps on the O2 XDA Neo?
No. The O2 XDA Neo runs Windows Mobile, which is incompatible with Android apps. While there may be unofficial attempts to port Android to the device, these are typically unstable and require advanced technical knowledge.
❓ What kind of gaming performance can I expect from the Poco F5?
The Poco F5's Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 is capable of running most popular mobile games at high settings. While it's not a flagship gaming phone, it provides a smooth and enjoyable gaming experience for titles like PUBG Mobile, Call of Duty Mobile, and Genshin Impact.
❓ Does the Poco F5 have a headphone jack?
No, the Xiaomi Poco F5 does not include a 3.5mm headphone jack. Users will need to utilize USB-C headphones or a USB-C to 3.5mm adapter for wired audio.
