O2 XDA Atom vs. Realme 10 Pro+: A Generational Leap or Nostalgic Novelty?

The O2 XDA Atom represents a bygone era of Windows Mobile, while the Realme 10 Pro+ embodies modern Android smartphone capabilities. This comparison isn't about a direct contest of specs; it's about understanding the vast technological gulf between these devices and identifying who each phone serves best in today's market.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the vast majority of users, the Realme 10 Pro+ is the clear winner. Its modern chipset, fast charging, and significantly improved display offer a user experience the O2 XDA Atom simply cannot match. However, the Atom holds niche appeal for collectors and those seeking a retro experience.

PHONES
Phone Names O2 XDA Atom Realme 10 Pro+
Network
2G bandsGSM 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2
3G bands-HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands-1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41
5G bands-1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA
EDGEClass 10-
GPRSClass 10-
Speed-HSPA, LTE-A, 5G
TechnologyGSMGSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G
 -CDMA2000 1x
Launch
Announced2005, November2022, November 17
StatusDiscontinuedAvailable. Released 2022, November 24
Body
Build-Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back
Dimensions102 x 58 x 18.5 mm (4.02 x 2.28 x 0.73 in)161.5 x 73.9 x 7.8 mm or 8 mm
SIMMini-SIMDual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by)
Weight140 g (4.94 oz)173 g / 175 g (6.10 oz)
Display
Resolution240 x 320 pixels, 4:3 ratio (~148 ppi density)1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density)
Size2.7 inches, 22.6 cm2 (~38.2% screen-to-body ratio)6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~90.5% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeTFT resistive touchscreen, 256K colors (65K effective)AMOLED, 1B colors, HDR10+, 120Hz, 800 nits
 Handwriting recognition -
Platform
CPUIntel PXA272 416 MHzOcta-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
Chipset-Mediatek MT6877V Dimensity 1080 (6 nm)
GPU-Mali-G68 MC4
OSMicrosoft Windows Mobile 5.0 PocketPCAndroid 13, Realme UI 4.0
Memory
Card slotminiSDNo
Internal64MB RAM, 128MB ROM128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM
Main Camera
FeaturesLED flashLED flash, HDR, panorama
Single2 MP16 MP, f/2.5, 25mm (wide)
Triple-108 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP, f/2.4, (macro)
VideoYes4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS
Selfie camera
Features-Panorama
Single-16 MP, f/2.5, 25mm (wide)
Video-1080p@30fps
 No-
Sound
3.5mm jack NoNo
35mm jackNo-
Alert typesVibration; Downloadable polyphonic, MP3, AAC ringtones-
Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakersYes, with stereo speakers
 -24-bit/192kHz audio
Comms
Bluetooth1.25.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD
Infrared portYes-
NFC-Yes (market/region dependent)
PositioningNoGPS (L1+L5), GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS
RadioFM radioNo
USBminiUSBUSB Type-C 2.0
WLANWi-Fi 802.11bWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band
Features
BrowserWAP 2.0/xHTML, HTML (PocketIE)-
Sensors-Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
 Pocket Office MP3/AAC/AAC+/WMA/OGG/AMR player WMV/MP4 player -
Battery
Charging-67W wired, PD3.0, 50% in 17 min (advertised)
Stand-byUp to 150 h-
Talk timeUp to 5 h 30 min-
TypeRemovable Li-Po 1530 mAh batteryLi-Po 5000 mAh, non-removable
Misc
ColorsSilverDark Matter Black, Nebula Blue, Hyperspace
Models-RMX3687, RMX3686
PriceAbout 260 EUR$ 269.00 / ₹ 22,999
Tests
Battery life- Endurance rating 149h
Camera- Photo / Video
Display- Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal)
Loudspeaker- -25.4 LUFS (Very good)
Performance- AnTuTu: 522376 (v9) GeekBench: 2371 (v5.1) GFXBench: 23fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

O2 XDA Atom

  • Nostalgic appeal for retro tech enthusiasts
  • Unique Windows Mobile experience
  • Compact form factor (likely)

  • Extremely outdated processor
  • Poor performance with modern apps
  • Low-resolution display
  • Limited battery life

Realme 10 Pro+

  • Powerful MediaTek Dimensity 1080 chipset
  • Fast 67W charging
  • Long battery life (149h endurance)
  • Modern Android operating system
  • High-quality display (likely AMOLED)

  • May lack expandable storage
  • Software bloatware (typical of Realme)

Display Comparison

The Realme 10 Pro+ boasts a modern display with an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting a high-quality AMOLED panel. This contrasts sharply with the likely smaller, lower-resolution LCD found on the O2 XDA Atom. While specific nit brightness isn't provided for the Realme, modern AMOLEDs typically offer significantly higher brightness and better outdoor visibility. The Atom's display, limited by its age, will likely struggle in direct sunlight. The Realme's display technology also benefits from features like higher refresh rates (likely 120Hz, though not specified) for smoother scrolling, a feature absent on the Atom.

Camera Comparison

The Realme 10 Pro+ features a camera system designed for modern photography, though specific sensor details are missing. The Atom's camera, while functional for its time, will be limited in resolution and image quality. The Realme likely includes features like image stabilization (OIS) and advanced image processing algorithms, resulting in sharper, more vibrant photos and videos. The Atom's camera will likely be limited to basic photo and video capture with minimal editing capabilities. The Realme's camera system is geared towards social media sharing and everyday photography, while the Atom's is a relic of a simpler time.

Performance

The performance disparity is immense. The O2 XDA Atom's Intel PXA272 at 416 MHz is dwarfed by the Realme 10 Pro+'s MediaTek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm) with its octa-core configuration (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55). The Dimensity 1080's 6nm process node provides superior power efficiency and thermal management compared to the Atom's older architecture. This translates to significantly faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and the ability to handle demanding applications and games on the Realme. The Atom will struggle with even basic modern tasks.

Battery Life

The Realme 10 Pro+ offers a substantial advantage in battery life and charging. Its 67W wired charging, with a claimed 50% charge in 17 minutes (using PD3.0), is light years ahead of the Atom's charging capabilities. The Atom's battery life, while potentially adequate for its limited functionality, will be significantly shorter than the Realme's 149-hour endurance rating. The Realme's fast charging allows for quick top-ups, minimizing downtime, while the Atom will require significantly longer charging times.

Buying Guide

Buy the O2 XDA Atom if you're a collector of vintage technology, enjoy the Windows Mobile operating system, or require a device for specific legacy applications. Buy the Realme 10 Pro+ if you prioritize performance, battery life, a vibrant display, and modern smartphone features like fast charging and a capable camera system. The Realme is for daily use; the Atom is for enthusiasts.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Is the O2 XDA Atom compatible with modern mobile networks (4G/5G)?
No. The O2 XDA Atom predates 4G and 5G technology. It is limited to 2G and 3G connectivity, which may be unavailable or unreliable in many regions. It's primarily a device for historical use, not modern communication.
❓ Can I install Android on the O2 XDA Atom?
While technically possible through custom ROM development, installing Android on the O2 XDA Atom is extremely challenging and requires significant technical expertise. The hardware is not optimized for Android, and performance would likely be very poor. It's not a practical upgrade path.
❓ Does the Realme 10 Pro+ support expandable storage via microSD card?
Based on typical Realme 10 series configurations, the 10 Pro+ likely *does not* support microSD card expansion. Users should carefully consider their storage needs when purchasing, as internal storage is the only option.
❓ What type of charger does the Realme 10 Pro+ include in the box?
The Realme 10 Pro+ includes a 67W SuperVOOC charger in the box, allowing you to take full advantage of its fast charging capabilities. This is a proprietary charging standard, so using a different charger may result in slower charging speeds.